Literature DB >> 21183101

Accuracy of a dual Scheimpflug analyzer and a corneal topography system for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes.

Giacomo Savini1, Piero Barboni, Michele Carbonelli, Kenneth J Hoffer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of the corneal power measurements by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer (Galilei) and a corneal topography system (Keratron) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in unoperated eyes.
SETTING: Private practice.
DESIGN: Case series.
METHODS: The IOL power was calculated for eyes having phacoemulsification and in-the-bag IOL implantation by entering into the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas 3 corneal power measurements: (1) simulated keratometry (K) by corneal topography, (2) simulated K derived by anterior corneal curvature only using the dual Scheimpflug analyzer, (3) total corneal power derived by anterior and posterior corneal curvatures through ray tracing using the dual Scheimpflug analyzer. The prediction error was calculated as the difference between the predicted and the measured refraction 1 month postoperatively.
RESULTS: Forty-three consecutive patients were enrolled. The mean arithmetic error was zero for all combinations of measurements due to constant optimization. Using the Hoffer Q formula, the mean absolute prediction errors were 0.23 diopters (D) ± 0.22 (SD) for the corneal topographer simulated K, 0.21 ± 0.18 D for the Scheimpflug simulated K, and 0.27 ±0.20 D for the Scheimpflug total corneal power (P>.05). No statistically significant different results (compared with the Hoffer Q formula) were obtained with the Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulas.
CONCLUSIONS: Both devices provided corneal power measurements that led to accurate IOL power calculation. The total corneal power by the dual Scheimpflug system is the first corneal power measurement shown to lead to accurate IOL power calculation without using the standard keratometric index. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Drs. Savini, Barboni, and Carbonelli have no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.
Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21183101     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  9 in total

1.  Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography and optical biometry for intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Ahmet Kirgiz; Kurşat Atalay; Havva Kaldirim; Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk; Mehmet Orcun Akdemir; Muhittin Taskapili
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Repeatability of total Keratometry and standard Keratometry by the IOLMaster 700 and comparison to total corneal astigmatism by Scheimpflug imaging.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Leonardo Taroni; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Kenneth J Hoffer
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  Repeatability of ocular measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug analyzer in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Carmen Lopez de la Fuente; Ana Sanchez-Cano; Francisco Segura; Lorena Fuentes-Broto; Isabel Pinilla
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with Scheimpflug/Placido Photography-Based Topography System and IOLMaster Partial Coherence Interferometry in Patients with Cataracts.

Authors:  Jinhai Huang; Na Liao; Giacomo Savini; Fangjun Bao; Ye Yu; Weicong Lu; Qingjie Hu; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Accuracy of optical biometry combined with Placido disc corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Kenneth J Hoffer; Piero Barboni; Nicole Balducci; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Pietro Ducoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Galilei Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part II.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Mahsaw N Motlagh; Michael S Murri; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

7.  A Multicenter Study of the Distribution Pattern of Posterior-To-Anterior Corneal Curvature Radii Ratio in Chinese Myopic Patients.

Authors:  Changting Tang; Qiaowei Wu; Baoyi Liu; Guanrong Wu; Jing Fan; Yijun Hu; Honghua Yu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-20

8.  Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION.

Authors:  Boonsong Wanichwecharungruang; Anyarak Amornpetchsathaporn; Kittipong Kongsomboon; Wisakorn Wongwijitsook; Kornkamol Annopawong; Somporn Chantra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Kenneth J Hoffer
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.