Literature DB >> 21179563

A Perceptual Phonetic Similarity Space for Languages: Evidence from Five Native Language Listener Groups.

Ann Bradlow1, Cynthia Clopper, Rajka Smiljanic, Mary Ann Walter.   

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to devise a means of representing languages in a perceptual similarity space based on their overall phonetic similarity. In Experiment 1, native English listeners performed a free classification task in which they grouped 17 diverse languages based on their perceived phonetic similarity. A similarity matrix of the grouping patterns was then submitted to clustering and multidimensional scaling analyses. In Experiment 2, an independent group of native English listeners sorted the group of 17 languages in terms of their distance from English. Experiment 3 repeated Experiment 2 with four groups of non-native English listeners: Dutch, Mandarin, Turkish and Korean listeners. Taken together, the results of these three experiments represent a step towards establishing an approach to assessing the overall phonetic similarity of languages. This approach could potentially provide the basis for developing predictions regarding foreign-accented speech intelligibility for various listener groups, and regarding speech perception accuracy in the context of background noise in various languages.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21179563      PMCID: PMC3003933          DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2010.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Speech Commun        ISSN: 0167-6393            Impact factor:   2.017


  14 in total

1.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.

Authors:  C T Best; G W McRoberts; E Goodell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners.

Authors:  Sander J van Wijngaarden; Herman J M Steeneken; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners.

Authors:  Satomi Imai; Amanda C Walley; James E Flege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.

Authors:  M L Garcia Lecumberri; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis.

Authors:  Richard M Stibbard; Jeong-In Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts.

Authors:  Rachel Hayes-Harb; Bruce L Smith; Tessa Bent; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2008

9.  Free classification of regional dialects of American English.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2007-07

10.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal.

Authors:  F Ramus; M Nespor; J Mehler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17
View more
  8 in total

1.  Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.

Authors:  Eriko Atagi; Tessa Bent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual Dimensions Underlying Tinnitus-Like Sounds.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Yuan He
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Revisiting the target-masker linguistic similarity hypothesis.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Naseem H Dillman-Hasso; ZhaoBin Li; Lucia Ray; Ellen Mamantov; Kristin J Van Engen; Julia F Strand
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Auditory free classification of nonnative speech.

Authors:  Eriko Atagi; Tessa Bent
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2013-11-01

5.  Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content.

Authors:  Susanne Brouwer; Kristin J Van Engen; Lauren Calandruccio; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Influences of Cognitive Processing Capacities on Speech Perception in Young Adults.

Authors:  Lily Tao; Marcus Taft
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-24

7.  Let's all speak together! Exploring the masking effects of various languages on spoken word identification in multi-linguistic babble.

Authors:  Aurore Gautreau; Michel Hoen; Fanny Meunier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differences in the Association between Segment and Language: Early Bilinguals Pattern with Monolinguals and Are Less Accurate than Late Bilinguals.

Authors:  Cynthia P Blanco; Colin Bannard; Rajka Smiljanic
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.