Literature DB >> 21173617

Seeing the spine in 3D: how will it change what we do?

Hubert Labelle1, Carl-Eric Aubin, Roger Jackson, Larry Lenke, Peter Newton, Stefan Parent.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) has appointed a committee to evaluate the clinical relevance and impact of 3D analysis on scoliotic deformities and to develop a 3D classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The goal of this article is to summarize and present the work done in recent years within this committee and show how 3D analysis of AIS has the potential to change our current methods to analyse and treat scoliosis.
METHODS: A database of 600 3D reconstructions of the spine of patients with AIS has been established using calibrated PA and lateral radiographs obtained from either digital radiographs or the EOS system. The 3D reconstructions were done using dedicated software and analyzed with the "da Vinci" view, a schematic top view representation of the 3D reconstructions, which summarizes the position of the End-Apex-End vertebrae planes (planes of maximum curvature).
RESULTS: Preliminary work was done using 3D reconstructions in 409 patients with AIS. Fuzzy clustering techniques were used to show that the cohort could be segmented in 5 easily differentiated curve patterns similar to those of the Lenke and King classifications. Two subsequent articles have shown that 3D reconstructions can be divided in different groups based on the location of the plane of maximum curvature of their curves. One study of 66 cases has shown a consistent loss of kyphosis within the 5 thoracic apical vertebrae. Finally, a study of 172 Lenke 1 curves analyzed by ISO Data cluster analysis has confirmed the presence of 2 statistically different subtypes according to the planes passing through the End-Apex-End vertebrae of the main thoracic curve.
CONCLUSIONS: The study presented suggests that a valid and clinically useful 3D classification of AIS is within reach. 3D analysis has the potential to improve our comprehension of AIS curve types and automatic 3D classification may help decrease the known variability of current 2D classifications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of retrospective comparative studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21173617     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181fd8801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  23 in total

1.  Three dimensional analysis of brace biomechanical efficacy for patients with AIS.

Authors:  David E Lebel; Zaid Al-Aubaidi; Eyun-Jung Shin; Andrew Howard; Reinhard Zeller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Marianne Alison; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  EOS suspension test for the assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Caroline Hirsch; Brice Ilharreborde; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  New sagittal classification of AIS: validation by 3D characterization.

Authors:  Mareille Post; Stephane Verdun; Pierre Roussouly; Kariman Abelin-Genevois
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  3D rod shape changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis instrumentation: how much does it impact correction?

Authors:  Franck Le Navéaux; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Peter O Newton; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Interrater reliability of three-dimensional reconstruction of the spine : Low-dose stereoradiography for evaluating bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H Almansour; W Pepke; J Rehm; T Bruckner; D Spira; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Stereoradiography imaging motion artifact: does it affect radiographic measures after spinal instrumentation?

Authors:  Anne-Laure Simon; Emmanuelle Ferrero; A N Larson; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Use of EOS imaging for the assessment of scoliosis deformities: application to postoperative 3D quantitative analysis of the trunk.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Jean Dubousset; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posteromedial translation: radiologic evaluation with a 3D low-dose system.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Guy Sebag; Wafa Skalli; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography.

Authors:  Tobias J Dietrich; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Alexander Schwab; Katja Pankalla; Florian M Buck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.