Literature DB >> 26940057

Stereoradiography imaging motion artifact: does it affect radiographic measures after spinal instrumentation?

Anne-Laure Simon1,2, Emmanuelle Ferrero3, A N Larson4, Kenton R Kaufman5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stereoradiography imaging (SRI) is an accurate and reliable low-dose radiographic method. However, patients must remain motionless during image acquisition. Motion artifacts are frequently noted. The aims of the study were to determine the incidence of the SRI motion artifact and assess if motion during SRI acquisition affects radiographic measurements.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, 198 patients with spinal instrumentation had biplanar SRI radiographs performed, of whom 39 had concomitant conventional radiographs. Eight coronal and sagittal spinal parameters were independently measured on SRI and conventional radiographs for the 39 patients by 2 observers. Inclusion criteria were: presence of spinal instrumentation of more than six levels and an SRI motion artifact identified on the coronal and/or the sagittal views on either the spinal rods or on the limbs. Means were compared between both types of radiographs using the Student's t test; intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for intraobserver reproducibility and interrater reliability.
RESULTS: A motion artifact was identified in 19.7 % (n = 39, mean age 19.5 ± 1.7 years) of the cases. There were no differences in any of the coronal or sagittal plane measurements between SRI and X-rays. Intraobserver reliability and interrater reproducibility was high (range 0.81-0.98).
CONCLUSIONS: Motion artifact during full-spine stereoradiography imaging acquisition is frequent, but does not affect spinal measurements. SRI with a motion artifact can be used to produce reliable measurements of the sagittal and coronal parameters. Some SRI images with a motion artifact may suggest loss of fixation or bending of the rods. However, after becoming familiar with the appearance of the motion artifact, repeat radiographs are rarely indicated. IRB NUMBER: 14-004872. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EOS®; Low-dose imaging; Movement artifact; Radiographic measures; Spinal surgery; Stereoradiography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26940057     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4462-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of image quality using a X-ray stereotactical whole-body system and a direct flat-panel X-ray device in examinations of the pelvis and knee.

Authors:  K B Krug; C Weber; H Schwabe; N-M Sinzig; B Wein; D Müller; K Wegmann; S Peters; V Sendler; K Ewen; M Hellmich; D Maintz
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2013-09-02

Review 2.  Musculoskeletal imaging in progress: the EOS imaging system.

Authors:  Marc Wybier; Philippe Bossard
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error.

Authors:  R T Morrissy; G S Goldsmith; E C Hall; D Kehl; G H Cowie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Benefits and unexpected artifacts of biplanar digital slot-scanning imaging in children.

Authors:  Steven L Blumer; David Dinan; Leslie E Grissom
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-02-22

5.  The effect of variation in arm position on sagittal spinal alignment.

Authors:  R Vedantam; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; D L Linville; K Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager.

Authors:  Sylvain Deschênes; Guy Charron; Gilles Beaudoin; Hubert Labelle; Josée Dubois; Marie-Claude Miron; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients.

Authors:  Olivier Gille; Nicolas Champain; Abdelkrim Benchikh-El-Fegoun; Jean-Marc Vital; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Evaluation of the three-dimensional deformities in scoliosis surgery with computed tomography: efficacy and relationship with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jae-Young Hong; Seung-Woo Suh; T R Easwar; Hitesh N Modi; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Jung-Ho Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.

Authors:  Szabolcs Somoskeöy; Miklós Tunyogi-Csapó; Csaba Bogyó; Tamás Illés
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters.

Authors:  Renaud Lafage; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Jensen K Henry; Vincent Challier; Bassel Diebo; Barthelemy Liabaud; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Difference in whole spinal alignment between supine and standing positions in patients with adult spinal deformity using a new comparison method with slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager and computed tomography through digital reconstructed radiography.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Masashi Okamoto; Shun Hatsushikano; Gabriel Caseiro; Kei Watanabe
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.