Literature DB >> 21170901

Expanding colorectal cancer screening among minority women.

Moshe Shike1, Mark Schattner, Alvaro Genao, Winsome Grant, Margaret Burke, Ann Zauber, Lianne Russo, Valerie Cuyjet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in the United States is inadequate in minority communities and particularly among those who lack insurance. Finding ways to increase screenings in these minorities presents a healthcare challenge. The authors sought to determine whether offering CRCS at the time of mammography is an effective way to increase CRCS among minority women.
METHODS: This study was offered to women attending the Breast Examination Center of Harlem (BECH), a community outreach program of Memorial Sloan-Kettering serving the primarily black and Hispanic Harlem Community. Screening was explained, medical fitness was determined, and colonoscopies were performed. Barriers to screening and ways to overcome them were ascertained. Participants had to be at least 50 years of age without a history of colorectal cancer or screening within the last 10 years.
RESULTS: There were 2616 women eligible for CRCS, of these women 2005 (77%) refused to participate in the study, and 611 (23%) women were enrolled. There was a high interest in CRCS including among those who declined to participate in the study. The major barrier was lack of medical insurance, which was partially overcome by alternative funding. Of the 611 women enrolled, 337 (55%) went on to have screening colonoscopy. Forty-nine (15%) women had adenomatous polyps.
CONCLUSIONS: Offering CRCS to minority women at the time of mammography and without a physician's referral is an effective way to expand screening. Screening colonoscopy findings are similar to those in the general population. Alternatives to traditional medical insurance are needed for the uninsured.
© 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21170901      PMCID: PMC3782747          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening.

Authors:  Julie Legler; Helen I Meissner; Cathy Coyne; Nancy Breen; Veronica Chollette; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.

Authors:  S Vijan; E W Hwang; T P Hofer; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; M Alikhan; O Cummings; T M Ulbright
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.

Authors:  T F Imperiale; D R Wagner; C Y Lin; G N Larkin; J D Rogge; D F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss; J H Bond; D J Ahnen; H Garewal; G Chejfec
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Risk factors for excess mortality in Harlem. Findings from the Harlem Household Survey.

Authors:  R E Fullilove; M T Fullilove; M E Northridge; M L Ganz; M T Bassett; D E McLean; A A Aidala; D H Gemson; C McCord
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989-1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1997)--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  D K Blackman; E M Bennett; D S Miller
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1999-10-08

10.  Colorectal carcinoma in poor blacks.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman; Tarek A Alshafie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of the Hispanic or latino population in health research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Aragones; Susan L Hayes; Mei Hsuan Chen; Javier González; Francesca M Gany
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

2.  Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-15

3.  Surveillance of colorectal cancer screening in new Mexico hispanics and non-Hispanic whites.

Authors:  Melissa Gonzales; Harold Nelson; Robert L Rhyne; S Noell Stone; Richard M Hoffman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-12

4.  Determinants of variations in self-reported barriers to colonoscopy among uninsured patients in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Chinedum Ojinnaka; Ann Vuong; Janet Helduser; Philip Nash; Marcia G Ory; David A McClellan; Jane N Bolin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-04

5.  Recruiting patients into the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: strategies and challenges across 5 sites.

Authors:  Jennifer E Boehm; Elizabeth A Rohan; Judith Preissle; Amy DeGroff; Rebecca Glover-Kudon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer screening among Korean Americans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kyeung Mi Oh; Kathryn H Jacobsen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-04

7.  Primary care colorectal cancer screening correlates with breast cancer screening: implications for colorectal cancer screening improvement interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer M Weiss; Nancy Pandhi; Sally Kraft; Aaron Potvien; Pascale Carayon; Maureen A Smith
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.488

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.