In spite of its highly immunogenic properties, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) establishes persistent infection in otherwise healthy individuals, making it one of the most widespread and deadly human pathogens. Mtb's prolonged survival may reflect production of microbial factors that prevent even more vigorous immunity (quantitative effect) or that divert the immune response to a non-sterilizing mode (qualitative effect). Disruption of Mtb genes has produced a list of several dozen candidate immunomodulatory factors. Here we used robotic fluorescence microscopy to screen 10,100 loss-of-function transposon mutants of Mtb for their impact on the expression of promoter-reporter constructs for 12 host immune response genes in a mouse macrophage cell line. The screen identified 364 candidate immunoregulatory genes. To illustrate the utility of the candidate list, we confirmed the impact of 35 Mtb mutant strains on expression of endogenous immune response genes in primary macrophages. Detailed analysis focused on a strain of Mtb in which a transposon disrupts Rv0431, a gene encoding a conserved protein of unknown function. This mutant elicited much more macrophage TNFα, IL-12p40 and IL-6 in vitro than wild type Mtb, and was attenuated in the mouse. The mutant list provides a platform for exploring the immunobiology of tuberculosis, for example, by combining immunoregulatory mutations in a candidate vaccine strain.
In spite of its highly immunogenic properties, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) establishes persistent infection in otherwise healthy individuals, making it one of the most widespread and deadly human pathogens. Mtb's prolonged survival may reflect production of microbial factors that prevent even more vigorous immunity (quantitative effect) or that divert the immune response to a non-sterilizing mode (qualitative effect). Disruption of Mtb genes has produced a list of several dozen candidate immunomodulatory factors. Here we used robotic fluorescence microscopy to screen 10,100 loss-of-function transposon mutants of Mtb for their impact on the expression of promoter-reporter constructs for 12 host immune response genes in a mouse macrophage cell line. The screen identified 364 candidate immunoregulatory genes. To illustrate the utility of the candidate list, we confirmed the impact of 35 Mtb mutant strains on expression of endogenous immune response genes in primary macrophages. Detailed analysis focused on a strain of Mtb in which a transposon disrupts Rv0431, a gene encoding a conserved protein of unknown function. This mutant elicited much more macrophage TNFα, IL-12p40 and IL-6 in vitro than wild type Mtb, and was attenuated in the mouse. The mutant list provides a platform for exploring the immunobiology of tuberculosis, for example, by combining immunoregulatory mutations in a candidate vaccine strain.
Mtb is one of the most potent admixtures of antigens and adjuvants known. In the laboratory, heat-killed Mtb emulsified in oil and water (Freund's complete adjuvant) helps elicit high-titer antibodies in animal models. Infection by Mtb elicits robust and long-lasting T and B cell responses to numerous Mtb antigens. Human T-cell responses to Mtb are so vigorous that injection of the dead bacillus into an already infected individual leads to inflammation-mediated tissue necrosis, a response called the Koch phenomenon [1].Yet human immunity frequently fails to eradicate Mtb infection and an estimated one-third of the global population is latently infected for life. Of these, 5–10% with no known impairment of immunity will go on to develop active tuberculosis and infect an average of 10 to 15 others [2]. When cured, such individuals remain susceptible to re-infection and can again develop active tuberculosis [3], [4], [5]. Mtb appears to have evolved to elicit an immune response too weak to fully clear infection but paradoxically strong enough, in hosts with active disease, to liquefy lung tissue and cause an infectious cough that allows transmission to new individuals. These circumstances pose a major question for immunobiology with significant implications for vaccinology: How does Mtb sculpt the host immune response to be quantitatively large but often qualitatively inadequate?Answering this question requires a better understanding of how Mtb modulates immunity. Murine models of infection recapitulate a number of key features of the human disease and allow the use of genetically modified bacteria and hosts to identify determinants of pathogenicity and susceptibility. In one such model, genetically resistant mice inhale small numbers of bacilli that are phagocytosed by macrophages in the pulmonary alveoli. The bacilli are transported into the interstitium and taken up by resident or recruited monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells and neutrophils [6]. Dendritic cells carry Mtb to draining lymph nodes, where naïve T cells are activated. Before, during or despite T cell activation, the bacteria replicate and escape into the efferent lymph, which carries them to the bloodstream for dissemination throughout the body, where most are taken up by macrophages. In people, disease can emerge at any time in any site, but most often appears years later in the lung.Following priming and clonal expansion in lymph nodes, mouseMtb-specific T cells traffic to the lung at ∼2–3 weeks post-infection [7], [8], [9]. The onset of a Th1-dominated immune response is marked by elevation of transcripts for IL-2, IL-12p40, IFNγ, TNFα and iNOS by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude [10], [11]. Cytokines, in particular IFNγ, synergize with products of Mtb to activate infected macrophages [12]. These events coincide with and are required for the abrupt cessation in bacterial outgrowth at ∼3 weeks post-infection, whereupon replication and death rates reach an equilibrium and bacterial numbers are maintained at near steady-state levels [13]. Nonetheless, inflammation escalates over many months until the mouse succumbs to respiratory insufficiency [14].Presumably, early innate responses shape the adaptive immune response to Mtb. As a primary reservoir for Mtb in vivo, macrophages are crucial for controlling bacterial growth but also influence the function of other cells in the immune system, including T- and B-lymphocytes [15], [16]. Recent “forward genetics” studies, aimed at identifying novel innate immunity pathways and factors that modulate the host-pathogen interaction, have unearthed essential roles for macrophage autophagy and production of immunomodulatory lipids in controlling Mtb disease [17], [18], [19]. We focused here on the early encounter of macrophages with Mtb and included IFNγ to model the influence of NK cells and γδ T cells that produce IFNγ during the earliest days of infection [20], [21], as do early-arising αβ T cells. The literature describes the impact of several dozen Mtb genes or gene products on early responses of macrophages [22], [23]. To expand that knowledge we systematically assessed macrophage responses to a large panel of loss-of-function mutants of Mtb.
Results
Development of Immunoreporter Macrophage Clones
To identify mutations in Mtb that lead to dysregulation of the macrophage immune response, we screened a library of 10,100 Mtb mutants generated by transposon insertion mutagenesis. The same library has provided valuable hits in previous screens [24], [25]. With its dependence on expansion of mutant clones, the library lacks inactivating mutations in genes essential for in vitro growth, but otherwise it approaches the ideal of representing loss of function mutations in most Mtb genes. Ideally we would globally evaluate macrophage responses to each Mtb mutant. However, safety constraints prevented us from generating large volumes of infectious waste as would be required by multiplexed ELISAs, and cost considerations precluded profiling the macrophage transcriptome over 10,000 times. We therefore limited the survey of the macrophage response to 12 host genes whose expression could be detected microscopically using fluorescent proteins as reporters.We selected the host genes (Figure 1A) by the following criteria. Pilot studies, in conjunction with published reports, confirmed that expression of all 12 genes is transcriptionally regulated in mouse macrophages in response to Mtb infection. Most are differentially regulated during tuberculosis in human subjects and, with the exception of Delta-4 and GITRL, targeted disruption of these genes has been reported to impart a phenotype in mice with experimental tuberculosis. Finally, they represented diverse molecular classes – cytokines (TNF, IL-12p40, IL-6, IL-10, GM-CSF), chemokines (RANTES, MCP-1), enzymes (iNOS, cyclooxygenase [COX] 2) and cell-surface co-stimulatory proteins (Delta-4, CD40, GITRL) – with known roles in immune responses to infection.
Figure 1
Generation and Validation of Immunoreporter Macrophage Clones.
(A) RAW 264.7 cells were transfected with constructs in which the promoter of a host gene was used to drive expression of a fluorescent reporter protein. The promoter region and 5′-UTR are specified relative to the “ATG” start codon of each gene. (B) Stably transfected IR populations were sorted by FACS to isolate cells with low baseline fluorescence (red box on left panel), expanded in vitro, then stimulated with IFNγ. Cells that upregulated fluorescence (red box on right panel) were sorted again to yield clonal, inducible IR macrophage clones. (C) IR macrophages expressing the promoter-reporter TNFα_AmCyan, CD40_DsRed, or COX2_YFP constructs were seeded together, then treated with WT Mtb (MOI ∼10), IFNγ, or both for 24 hrs. Fluorescence induction was assessed using automated fluorescence microscopy in the three distinct wavelengths. The bottom row represents a digital overlay of the three top rows. (D) Quantitation of (C) using Metamorph software. Data represent means ± SD of numbers (n) of independent wells indicated. (E) WT RAW 264.7 cells were treated as in C. At 8 hrs, gene induction was evaluated by qRT-PCR. Expression levels are relative to gapdh and are expressed as fold change relative to treatment with medium. Data represent means ± SD of triplicate wells.
Generation and Validation of Immunoreporter Macrophage Clones.
(A) RAW 264.7 cells were transfected with constructs in which the promoter of a host gene was used to drive expression of a fluorescent reporter protein. The promoter region and 5′-UTR are specified relative to the “ATG” start codon of each gene. (B) Stably transfected IR populations were sorted by FACS to isolate cells with low baseline fluorescence (red box on left panel), expanded in vitro, then stimulated with IFNγ. Cells that upregulated fluorescence (red box on right panel) were sorted again to yield clonal, inducible IR macrophage clones. (C) IR macrophages expressing the promoter-reporter TNFα_AmCyan, CD40_DsRed, or COX2_YFP constructs were seeded together, then treated with WT Mtb (MOI ∼10), IFNγ, or both for 24 hrs. Fluorescence induction was assessed using automated fluorescence microscopy in the three distinct wavelengths. The bottom row represents a digital overlay of the three top rows. (D) Quantitation of (C) using Metamorph software. Data represent means ± SD of numbers (n) of independent wells indicated. (E) WT RAW 264.7 cells were treated as in C. At 8 hrs, gene induction was evaluated by qRT-PCR. Expression levels are relative to gapdh and are expressed as fold change relative to treatment with medium. Data represent means ± SD of triplicate wells.We stably transfected murine macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cells with promoter-reporter constructs in which a promoter region of each host immune-response gene drives expression of one of three fluorescent proteins (AmCyan, DsRed or YFP) (Figure 1A). Each of the twelve Immunoreporter (IR) macrophage lines was subjected to clonal selection as follows. Unstimulated cells were sorted by flow cytometry to isolate populations with minimal resting fluorescence. From this group, cells that manifested high levels of fluorescence when stimulated with IFNγ (Figure 1B) were expanded as individual clones. Finally, by microscopy (Figure S1) we identified clones from each line that expressed homogeneously low fluorescence at baseline and homogeneously high fluorescence upon stimulation with IFNγ or with LPS.Stimulation of the IR macrophage cell clones with IFNγ, Mtb, or Mtb + IFNγ confirmed that fluorescence induction (Figure 1C, D) qualitatively reflected mRNA expression patterns for the native gene products (Figure 1E). Further, fluorescence levels increased along with increasing multiplicity of infection (MOI) (data not shown). As a positive control for the ability of these IR clones to resolve differences in stimulation induced by an Mtb mutant compared to wild type (WT) Mtb, we infected the macrophages with a mutant in mce1 that was reported to induce sub-normal levels of IL-6 and MCP-1 [26]. Indeed, the mutant elicited lower levels of fluorescence in the IL-6_YFP and MCP-1_DsRed IR clones than WT Mtb, mirroring reduced secretion of IL-6 and MCP-1 protein in wild-type RAW 264.7 cells (Figure S2A & S2B).
Primary Screen
Next we plated the 12 IR macrophage clones in 4 sets of 3. Thus, each well of an assay plate contained one IR clone signaling the expression of a given promoter via AmCyan, another announcing the activity of a different promoter via DsRed and a third reporting on yet another promoter via YFP. We infected each such well in each set with one of the 10,100 Mtb mutants and monitored alterations in fluorescence induction by automated microscopy. The use of pooled IR macrophage clones cut down the time and cost of screening by a factor of 3. Based on pilot experiments that indicated a better signal-to-noise ratio following IFNγ-costimulation, we reduced the burden of screening by another factor of 2 by omitting a no-IFNγ set and using IFNγ-costimulation throughout. Because the insertion of a transposon can affect Mtb biology, we reasoned that the most relevant baseline was the average response induced by all 10,1000 mutants. We considered a mutant to be a candidate hit if it elicited fluorescence levels differing from this average response to a statistically robust extent (see below). Each fluorescence level was characterized by its standardized residual (SR), a measure of the number of standard deviations separating it from the mean (Figure 2A).
Figure 2
Results of the Primary Screen.
(A) The SR of the response induced by each mutant, represented by points across the x-axis. Data points are color-coded according to the IR line in which the response was measured. (B) Hits (y-axis), defined as mutants that induced responses with an avg. |SR| >2, were stratified according to the number of IR clones they dysregulated (x-axis). Mutants were categorized into four groups: (I) those that strongly dysregulated fluorescence (avg. |SR| >3.5) in only 1 or 2 IR clones; (II) those that strongly dysregulated fluorescence in more than 2 IR clones; (III) those that moderately dysregulated fluorescence (avg. |SR| = 2–3.5) in more than 2 IR clones; and (IV) those that moderately dysregulated fluorescence in 1 or 2 IR clones. (C) The number of hits (|SR| >2) is depicted as a function of the number of IR clones dysregulated by each mutant. The numbers expected by chance (black) are compared to the numbers observed in the primary screen (red). Divergence between the observed and expected values was greatest when ≥4 IR clones were dysregulated.
Results of the Primary Screen.
(A) The SR of the response induced by each mutant, represented by points across the x-axis. Data points are color-coded according to the IR line in which the response was measured. (B) Hits (y-axis), defined as mutants that induced responses with an avg. |SR| >2, were stratified according to the number of IR clones they dysregulated (x-axis). Mutants were categorized into four groups: (I) those that strongly dysregulated fluorescence (avg. |SR| >3.5) in only 1 or 2 IR clones; (II) those that strongly dysregulated fluorescence in more than 2 IR clones; (III) those that moderately dysregulated fluorescence (avg. |SR| = 2–3.5) in more than 2 IR clones; and (IV) those that moderately dysregulated fluorescence in 1 or 2 IR clones. (C) The number of hits (|SR| >2) is depicted as a function of the number of IR clones dysregulated by each mutant. The numbers expected by chance (black) are compared to the numbers observed in the primary screen (red). Divergence between the observed and expected values was greatest when ≥4 IR clones were dysregulated.Applying a cut-off of SR >2.0 or <−2.0 yielded 2712 unique transposon mutants that induced altered fluorescence in one or more of the 12 IR clones (Figure 2A–B). The majority (2492; 91.9%) of these Mtb mutants dysregulated responses in only one or two of the IR clones (1885 and 607 Mtb mutants, respectively). However, these numbers were not greater than expected by chance, encouraging us to apply more robust statistical criteria (Figure 2C). Application of a cut-off value of |SR| >3.5 reduced the number of mutants that qualified as hits in one or two IR clones to 99 (Table S1) and 46 (Table S2), respectively (quadrant I of Figure 2B). Using the cutoff of |SR| >2.0, 210 mutants elicited aberrant responses in three or more IR clones, while only 125 such hits would be expected by chance. Differences between the observed number of hits and the number expected by chance were most dramatic for mutants that dysregulated four or more IR clones (Figure 2C). The 210 mutants exceeding this level for at least three IR clones could be further subdivided into 22 that elicited highly aberrant responses in three or more IR lines (average |SR| >3.5; quadrant II in Figure 2B and Table S3) and 188 that elicited moderately aberrant responses in three or more IR lines (average 2.0< |SR| <3.5; quadrant III in Figure 2B and Table S4).
Secondary Screen
The Mtb mutants chosen for further study (see below) were retested in each IR line in which aberrant responses were detected in the primary screen. For these experiments, we grew up the mutants in large-volume flasks to ensure their near-uniform viability, endeavored to prepare single-cell suspensions to better control the size of the infecting inoculum, performed 5–6 independent infections for each and compared responses to those induced by WT Mtb rather than to the average response to all mutants. Resource limitations confined the secondary screen to a subset of 191 hits from the primary screen. These were arbitrarily chosen without regard to quadrant. The following mutants were carried forward into the secondary screen: 55 mutants representing 38% of those in quadrant I of Figure 2B; 10 representing 44% of those in quadrant II; 66 representing 34% of those in quadrant III; and 60 representing 2.6% of those in quadrant IV. Figures 3A and 3B illustrate results for 4 hits identified in the primary screen. In aggregate, 29% of the hits were verified in the secondary screen, distributed as follows. 70% of the mutants tested from quadrant II were verified to dysregulate reporter induction in one or more IR clones. In contrast, the secondary screen confirmed only 25% and 24% of the tested mutants from quadrants I and III, confirmation rates that were comparable to those observed for mutants from quadrant IV. These observations conformed to expectations for false positives from statistical expectations according to the cut-off values chosen and the number of IR clones dysregulated. Among the false positives from the primary screen were 23 mutants that were also false negatives in the primary screen in the sense that they consistently exhibited altered fluorescence induction in the secondary screen that was directionally opposite to that observed in the primary screen. These mutants were carried forward as new positives in the secondary screen.
Figure 3
Illustration of Hit Confirmation in the Secondary Screen.
(A) GITRL_DsRed IR macrophages were infected with WT Mtb or mutants identified in the primary screen (MOI ∼10). Fluorescence induction was assessed at 24 hrs by automated fluorescence microscopy. Images from three replicate wells per condition are shown. (B) Quantitation of (A) using Metamorph software. Data represent means plus SD of 5–6 independent wells per condition.
Illustration of Hit Confirmation in the Secondary Screen.
(A) GITRL_DsRed IR macrophages were infected with WT Mtb or mutants identified in the primary screen (MOI ∼10). Fluorescence induction was assessed at 24 hrs by automated fluorescence microscopy. Images from three replicate wells per condition are shown. (B) Quantitation of (A) using Metamorph software. Data represent means plus SD of 5–6 independent wells per condition.
Phenotypes of Mtb Mutants in Primary Macrophages and Identification of Mutated Genes
The next set of studies put aside IR clones and promoter-reporter constructs in favor of primary bone marrow-derived macrophages and endogenous gene products. We measured transcript levels by qRT-PCR for GM-CSF, GITRL, CD40, COX2, and iNOS and secreted proteins by ELISA for IL-10, RANTES, TNFα, IL-12p40, MCP-1 and IL-6. We tested responses to 3 different MOIs for both WT and mutant strains of Mtb in 3 independent experiments per mutant, used the complete data sets to calculate a single value (“fold change”) for the greater or lesser efficiency of each Mtb mutant in eliciting a given response compared to WT Mtb, and calculated the statistical significance of each fold change, as detailed in the Supplemental Materials and Methods. In these experiments, we studied 53 of the 56 hits verified in the secondary screen. Figure 4 lists the 36 (68%) of these Mtb mutants that elicited statistically significant fold-change values in primary macrophages and were therefore considered verified in the tertiary screen.
Figure 4
Summary of Host Responses in Mutant-Infected BMD Macrophages.
Values represent the relative increase in the immune response as a function of increasing MOI, as compared to the response induced by WT Mtb. Only responses that were statistically different from the WT responses (p<0.05) are quantified. Responses were pooled from three independent experiments, each of which was evaluated over a range of three distinct MOIs. Fold-change >2.0 highlighted in red, 1.4–2.0 in pink, 0.6–0.7 in light blue, and <0.5 in dark blue. “x” means that the response failed to meet statistical significance. Gene names are supplied for strains in which mapping of the insertion site was successful.
Summary of Host Responses in Mutant-Infected BMD Macrophages.
Values represent the relative increase in the immune response as a function of increasing MOI, as compared to the response induced by WT Mtb. Only responses that were statistically different from the WT responses (p<0.05) are quantified. Responses were pooled from three independent experiments, each of which was evaluated over a range of three distinct MOIs. Fold-change >2.0 highlighted in red, 1.4–2.0 in pink, 0.6–0.7 in light blue, and <0.5 in dark blue. “x” means that the response failed to meet statistical significance. Gene names are supplied for strains in which mapping of the insertion site was successful.We were able to map the site of transposon insertion for 26 of the 36 mutants that confirmed in the tertiary screen (Figure 4). Table 1 lists the genes in which the transposon inserted, without implying that the phenotype necessarily arises from loss of function in the designated gene. To assign function it is necessary to evaluate the possibility of polar effects of each insertion and to complement each disrupted gene with a WT copy; such efforts are beyond the scope of this initial study.
Table 1
Identification of Transposon Insertion Site in Mutants with Confirmed Immunoregulatory Phenotypes.
Rv Designation
Gene
Annotation
Phenotype (Hyper- or Hypo-Stimulatory Relative to WT Mtb)
Lipid Metabolism & Trafficking
Rv1146
mmpL13b
Transmembrane transport protein
Hyper-
Rv0404
fadD30
Long-chain fatty acyl-AMP ligase
Hyper-
Rv2928
tesA
Thioesterase
Hypo-
Rv3087
---
Triacylgleycerol synthase
Hypo-
Rv2284
lipM
Lipid esterase
Hypo-
Rv2051
ppm1
Polyprenol-monophosphomannose synthase
Mixed
Rv0017c
rodA
Cell division protein
Hyper-
Secreted Proteins/Secretion Systems
Rv3867
---
Conserved hypothetical = > RD1 locus
Hypo-
Rv3869
---
Conserved hypothetical = > RD1 locus
Mixed
Rv2608
ppe42
PPE protein
Hyper-
Rv3006c
lppZ
Lipoprotein
Mixed
Rv3347c
ppe55
PPE protein
Hyper-
Transcriptional Regulators
Rv0165c
mce1R
GNTR-family transcriptional repressor
Hypo-
Rv0431
---
Tuberculin-related peptide
Hyper-
Intermediary Metabolism
Rv0458
---
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase
Hypo-
Rv3549c
---
Short-chain type dehydrogenase/reductase
Hyper-
Rv0927
---
Short-chain type dehydrogenase/reductase
Hyper-
Miscellaneous
Rv1633
uvrB
DNA repair enzyme
Hyper-
Rv1082
mca
Mycothiol conjugate amidase
Hyper-
Rv0146
---
SAM-dependent methyltransferase
Hyper-
Rv3191
---
Transposase
Hypo-
Unannotated
---
ORF between Rv3428 and ppe59
Hypo-
Conserved Hypothetical
Rv0264c
---
Conserved Hypothetical
Hypo-
Rv1590
---
Conserved Hypothetical
Hyper-
Rv2307
---
Conserved Hypothetical
Hypo-
Rv2082
---
Conserved Hypothetical
Hyper-
Phenotype of Mtb Tn:Rv0431
We selected one mutant for more extensive characterization of its impact on the host-pathogen interaction. In Mtb Tn:Rv0431, the transposon inserted between codon 121 and 122 of Rv0431, a gene predicted to encode a 164-amino acid protein of unknown function. Southern analysis of genomic DNA from this mutant confirmed a single transposon insertion site (data not shown). Rv0431 is the second gene in a putative 5-gene operon that also includes Rv0430, sodC, Rv0433, and Rv0434. The putative operon is highly conserved in Mycobacteria and other members of the Actinobacteria family, including Nocardia and Rhodococcus species (Figure 5A). The only gene in the putative operon with an assigned function is sodC, which encodes a membrane-tethered zinc/copper superoxide dismutase.
Figure 5
Tn:Rv0431 Dysregulates Macrophage Immunity.
(A) Mtb Rv0431 appears in the context of a suite of genes, including Rv0430, sodC, Rv0433, and Rv0434 which are predicted to be co-transcribed. The members and arrangement of this operon are evolutionarily conserved across other Mycobacteria and the related Actinobacteria species, Nocardia and Rhodococcus. (B) Average fluorescence induction in IR macrophages by Tn:Rv0431 (red) or WT Mtb (black) in the number of independent experiments indicated by “n”. Data expressed as the average fold-change relative to induction by WT Mtb ± SE of replicate wells (C) WT RAW macrophages were infected withTn:Rv0431 (red) or WT Mtb (black). Gene induction was assessed at 8 hrs post-infection by qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate wells. (D) BMD macrophages were infected with WT Mtb (black), Tn:Rv0431 (red) or Tn:Rv0431::Rv0431 (blue) over a range of input values (bacterial DNA concentration in pg/mL). TNFα, IL-6, and IL-12p40 were measured in the supernatants by ELISA at 26 hours. Responses in duplicate wells were assessed for each input value. Second-order polynomial trend lines were fit to the data using Excel.
Tn:Rv0431 Dysregulates Macrophage Immunity.
(A) Mtb Rv0431 appears in the context of a suite of genes, including Rv0430, sodC, Rv0433, and Rv0434 which are predicted to be co-transcribed. The members and arrangement of this operon are evolutionarily conserved across other Mycobacteria and the related Actinobacteria species, Nocardia and Rhodococcus. (B) Average fluorescence induction in IR macrophages by Tn:Rv0431 (red) or WT Mtb (black) in the number of independent experiments indicated by “n”. Data expressed as the average fold-change relative to induction by WT Mtb ± SE of replicate wells (C) WT RAW macrophages were infected withTn:Rv0431 (red) or WT Mtb (black). Gene induction was assessed at 8 hrs post-infection by qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate wells. (D) BMD macrophages were infected with WT Mtb (black), Tn:Rv0431 (red) or Tn:Rv0431::Rv0431 (blue) over a range of input values (bacterial DNA concentration in pg/mL). TNFα, IL-6, and IL-12p40 were measured in the supernatants by ELISA at 26 hours. Responses in duplicate wells were assessed for each input value. Second-order polynomial trend lines were fit to the data using Excel.In the secondary screen, Tn:Rv0431 induced higher levels of fluorescence in all IR clones except the RANTES_AmCyan IR line (Figure 5B), the IR clone that gave the fewest verifiable results. We infected WT RAW 264.7 cells with Tn:Rv0431 or WT Mtb and evaluated induction of nine of the native host genes using qRT-PCR. Infection with Tn:Rv0431 resulted in greater expression of transcripts for IL-12p40, IL-6, Delta4, CD40, GM-CSF, RANTES, TNFα and MCP-1, but not GITRL or iNOS, than WT Mtb, both with (not shown) or without IFNγ costimulation (Figure 5C). Results were similar at the protein level for the three products tested by ELISA (IL-6, MCP-1 and IL-12p40; data not shown).Compared to WT Mtb, infection of primary macrophages with Tn:Rv0431 resulted in secretion of much larger amounts of IL-10, IL-6, MCP-1, IL-12p40 and TNFα as judged by ELISA and higher levels of transcripts for GM-CSF and COX-2 as measured by qRT-PCR (Figure 5D and Figure S3A–B). To confirm that comparable numbers of bacteria were used for the infection, we measured the genomic content of each bacterial strain at each of the three doses administered to macrophages. As shown in Figure 5D, responses increased in a dose dependent manner for each strain but Tn:Rv0431 consistently induced more vigorous responses when comparable bacterial doses were evaluated. This trend was consistent when responses were regressed against a secondary measure of bacterial input, colony-forming units (determined by plating the input inoculum on enriched solid agar; Figure S3C). Importantly, dysregulation was gene specific, as RANTES, iNOS, and CD40 levels were induced comparably by both WT and Tn:Rv0431 (Figures S3A–B).To confirm that disruption of Rv0431 caused the altered immune responses in macrophages, and to rule out effects due to secondary mutations, expression of Rv0431 was restored in Tn:Rv0431 by complementation using the predicted promoter upstream of Rv0430. As shown in Figure 5D, genetic restoration of Rv0431 in Tn:Rv0431 fully reverted the immunoregulatory phenotype to that of WT Mtb.Finally, we assessed the phenotype of the Tn:Rv0431 mutant in vivo by exposing C57BL/6 mice to aerosols of Tn:Rv0431 or WT Mtb. Both strains replicated at comparable rates during the first week. However, between the first and second week—before the onset of adaptive immunity detectable with conventional assays— Tn:Rv0431 became markedly attenuated in the lungs of infected animals, with CFU an order of magnitude lower than WT at 2 weeks and 2 orders of magnitude lower than WT by 34 weeks (Figure 6A, B). Genetic complementation of Tn:Rv0431 with the WT allele restored the bacterial burden to WT levels (Figure 6B). Infection with Tn:Rv0431 was associated with correspondingly less gross and microscopic pathology than infection with WT Mtb (Figure 6C). A similar level of attenuation was noted in the spleens of Tn:Rv0431-infected animals at later time points (Figure S4A). Attenuation in vivo was not due to a general growth defect, as Tn:Rv0431 grew like WT Mtb in standard 7H9 medium (Figure S5).
Figure 6
Tn:Rv0431 is Attenuated In Vivo and Elicits Heightened Immune Responses in the Lung.
(A) Mice were infected with WT Mtb (black squares) or Tn:Rv0431 (red squares) via the aerosol route. Bacterial burdens were assessed in the lung at indicated times post-infection. Data points are means ± standard deviations from 3–5 mice. Results are representative of 3 independent experiments. (B) As in (A), except Tn:Rv0431::Rv0431 (blue triangles) was included in this experiment. (C) Gross pathology (right panel) and hematoxylin and eosin staining of lung sections (40× magnification; left panel) from infected animals. Gross pathology images are from the upper left lobes of 3 mice at day 140 post-infection. Histopathology images are representative sections from the upper left lobes of mice at day 63 post-infection.
Tn:Rv0431 is Attenuated In Vivo and Elicits Heightened Immune Responses in the Lung.
(A) Mice were infected with WT Mtb (black squares) or Tn:Rv0431 (red squares) via the aerosol route. Bacterial burdens were assessed in the lung at indicated times post-infection. Data points are means ± standard deviations from 3–5 mice. Results are representative of 3 independent experiments. (B) As in (A), except Tn:Rv0431::Rv0431 (blue triangles) was included in this experiment. (C) Gross pathology (right panel) and hematoxylin and eosin staining of lung sections (40× magnification; left panel) from infected animals. Gross pathology images are from the upper left lobes of 3 mice at day 140 post-infection. Histopathology images are representative sections from the upper left lobes of mice at day 63 post-infection.Differences in cytokine expression in response to infection by two different strains of Mtb are difficult to interpret when antigenic load is different. However, the nearly identical bacterial loads at one week after infection of mice with Tn:Rv0431 or WT Mtb allowed an analysis of immune response gene expression in the lungs at this early time point using qRT-PCR, although levels were not yet high enough for detection by ELISA. As shown in Figure S4B, expression of TNFα, IL-6, Lrg-47 and CD40 was significantly higher in lungs of mice infected with Tn:Rv0431 than WT Mtb.
Discussion
This study represents one of the most extensive surveys of the Mtb genome to date to identify factors involved in modulating macrophage immunity. Many reports have studied single Mtb genes for their impact on host immunity or multiple Mtb genes for their immunomodulatory effects on single host genes [22], [23], [27]. Here, we screened 10,100 Mtb mutants for their impact on expression of 12 host cytokines, chemokines, enzymes and developmental regulators. We identified 35 Mtb genes with previously unknown roles in host immunity and another 228 Mtb genes that are strong candidates for regulating these host responses. We focused on one gene of unknown function, Rv0431, and confirmed its profound role in suppressing TNFα, IL12p40 and IL-6 production in primary macrophages. Mtb lacking Rv0431 grew normally in vitro but poorly in mice and thereafter failed to maintain its numbers during the chronic phase of the infection.Though important, these findings must be viewed in the context of the substantial technical challenges associated with a screen of this breadth and depth, most notably the sensitivity of the macrophage responses to variations in the bacterial inoculum, which could not be perfectly normalized across 10,100 mutants. Nonetheless, despite a large false positive rate in the primary screen, 68% of the mutants that we subjected to further study were confirmed to dysregulate innate responses of primary macrophages. Confirmatory analyses are required for the other 228 equally promising candidates identified in the primary screen that we have not yet tested in primary macrophages (marked by asterisks in Tables S1, S2, S3, S4).With the exception of mceR1 [28], the transposon-disrupted genes identified in our screen have not been reported to be involved in immune regulation. However, based on what is known about the interrupted genes, their homologs in other organisms and their neighbors on the Mtb chromosome, we consider possible mechanisms for the observed immunomodulatory properties of these mutants.Given that lipids are estimated to contribute >40% of the dry weight of the bacillus [29], that some are shed [30] and that others may be among the first molecules on the Mtb surface that macrophages encounter, it is not surprising that many Mtblipids have well-described roles in modulating host immunity, including phthiocerol dimycoserosates (pDIM), sulfolipids, lipomannans, mycolic acids and phenolic glycolipids [31], [32], [33], [34]. Many of the disrupted genes discovered in our screen have predicted roles in the synthesis, degradation or trafficking of Mtblipids, including mmpL13B, tesA, fadD30, Rv3087, lipM, and ppm1. For example, mmpL13B encodes a putative lipid transporter with homology to other transporters, such as MmpL7 and MmpL8, known to deliver immunomodulatory lipids to the cell wall [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. Another identified gene, fadD30, is predicted to encode a long-chain fatty acyl-AMP ligase involved in lipid synthesis [40]. Deletion of a related enzyme, FadD26, led to a defect in pDIM production associated with enhanced TNFα and IL-6 secretion from macrophages [41]. In addition, the gene immediately downstream of and likely cotranscribed with fadD30, pks6, is important for polar lipid synthesis [42] and virulence in mice [43], where it plays a role in countering IFNγ-dependent host defenses [44].Several other genes we identified could play ancillary roles in lipid synthesis or storage. tesA, encoding a type II thioesterase, is located immediately upstream of a large virulence cluster involved in pDIM biosynthesis and has a postulated role in the release of mature lipids from the pDIM synthesis machinery [42], [45]. Rv3087, codes for a triacylgylcerol synthase within the mymA operon, which has been linked to virulence, resistance to host defenses, and the synthesis of mycolic acids, another lipid class with potent and diverse roles in immunological modulation by Mtb [27], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]. A mutant lacking the mymA operon induced significantly less IL-1β, IL-6, RANTES, and MCP-1 in humanTHP-1 monocyte-like leukemia cells [54], consistent with our findings of diminished immune responses in primary mouse macrophages by the Tn:Rv3087 mutant. Ppm1 encodes polyprenol-monophosphomannose synthase, an enzyme involved in the synthesis of the cell wall glycolipids, lipomannan and lipoarabinomannan, both of which function as TLR ligands and as modulators of immune cell function [31].Several Mtb immunoregulatory genes identified here encode secreted factors (lppZ, ppe55, and ppe42) or proteins involved in secretion systems (Rv3867 and Rv3869). Rv3869, and perhaps Rv3867, function as part of a multi-protein translocon known as the ESX-1 secretion system, which is involved in the secretion of virulence and immumodulatory factors, including ESAT-6 and CFP-10 [55], [56], [57]. ESX-1-related effects on host immunity include modulation of inflammation, apoptosis, necrosis, phagosomal maturation, phagosomal escape, membrane/cell lysis, tissue invasion, cell-to-cell spread and virulence. The secreted proteins LppZ, PPE55, and PPE42 are dominant B-cell antigens in tuberculosispatients [58], [59], [60]. Other PE/PPE family proteins are known to modulate cytokine production and apoptosis in T-cells and macrophages [61], [62], [63], [64], [65].To illustrate the potential of this approach to provide insights into the immunobiology of experimental tuberculosis, we focused on Rv0431 because nothing has been reported about this gene, yet its disruption had a striking effect on macrophage production of cytokines in vitro and on tuberculosis in the mouse. Disruption of Rv0431 led to enhanced fluorescence induction in 11 of the 12 IR macrophage cell clones and robust hyperinflammatory responses in mutant-infected primary macrophages. In vivo, Tn:Rv0431 became markedly attenuated between day 7 and 14 post-infection and, at later time points, the reduction in bacterial load was mirrored by a decrease in accumulation of host lymphoid and myeloid cells in the lungs. Given that Tn:Rv0431 has no growth defect in standard broth in vitro, these findings demonstrate a role for Rv0431 in Mtb virulence. Moreover, attenuation in vivo was preceded by suggestive evidence for an increased inflammatory responses in the lung (TNFα, IL-6, TGFβ, LRG-47 and CD40) commonly associated with macrophage or DC responses. The attenuation of Tn:Rv0431 in vivo is noteworthy in that neither SodC nor Rv0433 appear to be required for full virulence in mice [66]. Nevertheless, SodC is markedly upregulated upon infection of human macrophages and is important for the survival of Mtb in activated murine macrophages, where it likely functions in the defense against reactive oxygen species [67], [68]. Collectively, these findings implicate Rv0431 and its neighboring genes as important Mtb virulence factors and highlight the need for additional studies to explore the function(s) of this gene cluster.To our knowledge, this is the first description of a biological role for Rv0431. Though its cellular function remains unknown, two short nucleotide stretches in the C-terminus of Rv0431 have low homology to sequences in other bacterial proteins annotated as cell envelope-related or LytR-family transcriptional regulators. In other organisms, LytR-related transcriptional regulators have important roles in peptidoglycan formation, cell wall maintenance, biofilm formation, β-lactam resistance and stress tolerance [69], [70]. Further study will clarify whether Rv0431 is a transcriptional regulator.BCG is the only vaccine now available against tuberculosis but shows poor efficacy in preventing pulmonary tuberculosis in adults [71], [72]. The limited efficacy of BCG is not surprising, given that infection with Mtb itself does not routinely lead to protective immunity against re-infection [3], [4], [5]. It is a tall order for a vaccine to generate better immunity than native infection. Most experimental tuberculosis vaccines use one or two antigens from Mtb [73]. The work described here is a first step toward testing a complementary strategy—to subtract a small number of antigens from Mtb, so that the immune response it elicits is more protective. After we or others study additional mutants identified in the present study, it is our hope that mice can be vaccinated with a single strain engineered to include several such mutations, along with several that impose auxotrophies to prevent the mutant from replicating in the host [74].
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
Studies with mice followed a protocol approved by the Weill Cornell Medical College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (#0705-617) and were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health.
Mice
Eight-week old female C57BL/6 mice from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine) were housed in specific-pathogen-free facilities at Weill Cornell Medical College and Rockefeller University.
Mycobacterial Cultures
H37RvMtb was from ATCC. The mce1 mutant [26] and its parent strain (Erdman) were kindly provided by S. Ehrt, Weill Cornell Medical College. The mutant library and Mtb growth in vitro were as described [25]. Individual mutants were frozen at -80 C in 15% glycerol/7H9 in 96-well plates; library mutants were thawed and resuspended immediately prior to infection of IR macrophages, as described below.
Infection of IR Macrophage Clones
IR macrophages were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 1 M HEPES (cDMEM). For fluorescence assays, 104 total cells were seeded in the inner 60 wells of 96-well microscopy plates and cultured overnight. For the primary screen, three IR macrophage clones (each expressing either YFP, DsRed, or AmCyan) were seeded together in each well and simultaneously infected with each mutant in the Mtb library. IR macrophages were treated with 2.5 ng/mL IFNγ (Genentech) and infected with 1 µL of each Mtb mutant. Because of differences in bacterial viability after the freeze-thaw cycle required to store the library, the actual MOI (as determined by retrospective plating for CFUs on 7H9agar) varied considerably across the strains. At 22–24 hrs post-infection, cells were fixed with 4.2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 2 hrs, washed twice with PBS and stained with 2 µg/mL Hoechst 33342 in PBS. For each round of infection, control wells on separate plates were studied in medium alone to confirm low basal fluorescence and after exposure to 2.5 ng/mL IFNγ to confirm responsiveness to a stimulus.
Confirmation of Hits in IR Macrophage Clones
Hits from the primary screen were re-cloned on 7H11/OADC agar, then grown to early-log phase in 7H9/ADN. Clumps were removed by centrifugation in PBS-0.05% Tween80 to generate single-cell suspensions. Bacterial concentration was back-calculated from OD580 measurements and bacteria were resuspended in cDMEM for infection of macrophages. Individual (rather than pooled) IR macrophage clones were infected with each mutant or WT Mtb at MOI = 10 and fluorescence induction was measured as described above. Mutants that induced ≥1.4-fold more or ≤0.7-fold less fluorescence than WT Mtb were considered “confirmed” with respect to the IR clones and were then tested in primary macrophages.
Hit Validation in Primary Bone Marrow-Derived (BMD) Macrophages
BMD were derived as described [12], except antibiotics were omitted. 105 macrophages were infected with single-cell suspensions of pDIM+ WT Mtb or mutant strains at target MOIs of 1, 3 and 5. Tn:Rv0431 and a pDIM-deficient strain were included as controls for higher and lower induction, respectively. Uninfected cells served as a negative control. Macrophage responses were assessed by qRT-PCR at 8 hrs or by ELISA (RnD Systems) at 24 hrs post-infection. Two intra-assay replicates per MOI were included for every condition and 2–3 independent experiments were performed for each mutant. Bacterial input was determined retrospectively by plating serial dilutions on 7H11/OADC agar and enumerating CFUs.
mRNA Isolation and qRT-PCR
Macrophages were lysed in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Bromochloropropane was added, then RNA was isolated using the MagMAX-96 Total RNA Isolation Kit including treatment with MagMAX TURBO DNase (Ambion). ∼300 ng RNA was reverse transcribed using 50 units MuLV reverse transcriptase, 2.5 µM oligo-d(T)16 primer and 20 units RNase Inhibitor (Applied Biosystems). mRNA expression levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR using gene-specific primers and Taqman probes labeled with FAM and BHQ on the 5′- and 3′-ends, respectively. Amplifications were performed on the ABI Prism 7900HT sequence detection system (PerkinElmer). Threshold values were set in SDS 1.0 software (Applied Biosystems) such that CT values were derived from the early linear phase. The abundance of gene-specific mRNAs was quantified relative to expression of the housekeeping gene GAPDH, according to the formula: Relative mRNA Induction = 2CT(GAPDH)–CT(GENE).
Identification of Transposon Insertion Sites
Genomic DNA was purified from select mutants and the transposon insertion site was identified by sequencing.
Mouse Infections
Mice were infected by aerosolizing Mtb suspensions in PBS-0.05% Tween80 in a Middlebrook airborne infection apparatus (Glas-col, Terre Haute, Ind.). Mice were euthanatized with CO2 and the right and lower left pulmonary lobes were homogenized in PBS. Serial dilutions were plated on 7H11/OADC agar for CFU determination. The upper left lobe was divided for mRNA extraction and histology (Supplemental Methods).Evaluation of IR candidates by fluorescence microscopy. For each IR line, ∼30 clonal populations were evaluated by fluorescence microscopy for fluorescence induction under resting or stimulatory conditions. Clones that showed (a) minimal fluorescence under basal conditions, (b) maximal induction upon stimulation with IFNγ (2.5 ng/mL) or LPS (18 ng/mL), and (c) minimal cell-to-cell heterogeneity among fluorescent cells, were chosen for use in the primary screen. Three such clones, from the YFP_IL-10 IR line, are shown here as an example.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Fluorescence induction is decreased following infection with a hypostimulatory Mtb mutant. (A) Fluorescence induction in the MCP-1_DsRed and IL-6_YFP IR clones in response to infection with WT (black bars) or mce1-deficient (red bars) Mtb. Unstimulated cells were included as a control (grey bar). (B) Secretion of native MCP-1 and IL-6 by WT RAW264.7 cells in response to infection with WT or mce1-deficient Mtb, as assessed by ELISA. Data are representative of two independent experiments. Bars represent mean and standard deviations of triplicate wells. In experiments measuring IL-6 secretion and IL-6_YFP fluorescence, macrophages were costimulated with 2.5 ng/mL IFNγ.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.BMD macrophages were infected with WT Mtb (black) or Tn:
(red) over a range of bacterial inputs. Responses in duplicate wells were assessed for each strain at each input value. Second-order polynomial trend lines were fit to the data using Excel. (A) and (B) are from a single representative experiment in which responses were regressed against bacterial DNA concentration (ng/uL). (A) Cytokines in the supernatants were measured by ELISA at 26 hours. (B) Host mRNA expression was measured by qRT-PCR at 8 hours. (C) As in (A), except that responses were regressed against the MOI, as determined by plating for CFUs on enriched solid agar.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Tn:
is Attenuated
and Elicits Heightened Immune Responses in the Lung. Mice were infected with WT Mtb (black) or Tn:Rv0431 (red) via the aerosol route. (A) Bacterial burdens in the spleen at days 14, 28, 63, and 140 post-infection. Data points are means and standard deviations from 3-5 mice. Results are representative of two independent experiments. (B) Expression of host genes in the lungs of infected animals at day 7, as determined by qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as fold-change relative to responses induced by WT Mtb. Bars represent the mean and SD from 5 mice. Asterisk denotes p < 0.05. Results are representative of two independent experiments.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Tn:
Does Not Have a Growth Defect In Enriched Liquid Culture. WT Mtb (black) and Tn:Rv0431 (red) were grown in 7H9-ADN liquid media for 14 days at 37 C. The optical density was measured at indicated intervals at 580 nm as a read-out for culture density.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Mutants from the Primary Screen that Dysregulated One IR Clone with |SR| > 3.5 (Quadrant I in
). Values represent the SR of the response induced by each mutant (rows) in each of the twelve IR clones (columns) in the primary screen. SR > 3.5 in red; SR < -3.5 in blue. Mutants marked by an asterisk were not evaluated in follow-up studies.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.Mutants from the Primary Screen that Dysregulated Two IR Clones with an Average |SR| > 3.5 (Quadrant I in
). Values represent the SR of the response induced by each mutant (rows) in each of the twelve IR clones (columns) in the primary screen. SR > 3.5 in red; 2.0 < SR < 3.5 in pink; -2.0 > SR > -3.5 in light blue; and SR < -3.5 in dark blue. The average |SR| (for all responses with |SR| > 2) is quantified for each mutant in the second column from the right. In the far right column, “+” denotes a mutant that induced hyperstimulatory responses, “–” denotes hypostimulatory, and “M” denotes mixed response across IR clones. Mutants marked by an asterisk were not evaluated in follow-up studies.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.Mutants from the Primary Screen that Dysregulated >2 IR Clones with an Average |SR| > 3.5 (Quadrant II in
). Values represent the SR of the responses induced by each mutant in each of the twelve IR clones in the primary screen. SR > 3.5 in red; 2.0 < SR < 3.5 in pink; -2.0 > SR > -3.5 in light blue; and SR < -3.5 in dark blue. The average |SR| (for all responses with |SR| > 2) is quantified for each mutant. Second column from the right indicates the number of IR clones with an |SR| > 2.0. In the last column, “+” denotes hyperstimulatory responses, “–” denotes hypostimulatory responses and “M” denotes mixed responses across IR clones. Mutants marked by an asterisk were not evaluated in follow-up studies.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.Mutants from the Primary Screen that Dysregulated >2 IR Clones with an Average 2.0 < |SR| < 3.5 (Quadrant III in
). Values represent the SR of the responses induced by each mutant in each of the twelve IR clones in the primary screen. SR > 3.5 in red; 2.0 < SR < 3.5 in pink; -2.0 > SR > -3.5 in light blue; and SR < -3.5 in dark blue. The average |SR| (for all responses with |SR| > 2) is quantified for each mutant. Second column from the right indicates the number of IR clones with an |SR| > 2.0. In the last column, “+” denotes hyperstimulatory responses, “–” denotes hypostimulatory responses and “M” denotes mixed responses across IR clones. Mutants marked by an asterisk were not evaluated in follow-up studies.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Kerry J Welsh; April N Abbott; Shen-An Hwang; Jessica Indrigo; Lisa Y Armitige; Michael R Blackburn; Robert L Hunter; Jeffrey K Actor Journal: Microbiology (Reading) Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.777
Authors: William W Reiley; Mark D Calayag; Susan T Wittmer; Jennifer L Huntington; John E Pearl; Jeffrey J Fountain; Cynthia A Martino; Alan D Roberts; Andrea M Cooper; Gary M Winslow; David L Woodland Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Claire S Andersen; Else Marie Agger; Ida Rosenkrands; Jessica M Gomes; Veemal Bhowruth; Kevin J C Gibson; Rune V Petersen; David E Minnikin; Gurdyal S Besra; Peter Andersen Journal: J Immunol Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Jackson G Egen; Antonio Gigliotti Rothfuchs; Carl G Feng; Nathalie Winter; Alan Sher; Ronald N Germain Journal: Immunity Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Dee N Dao; Kari Sweeney; Tsungda Hsu; Sudagar S Gurcha; Ivan P Nascimento; Dan Roshevsky; Gurdyal S Besra; John Chan; Steven A Porcelli; William R Jacobs Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Jennifer L Eitson; Jennifer J Medeiros; Ashley R Hoover; Shashikant Srivastava; Kole T Roybal; José A Aínsa; Eric J Hansen; Tawanda Gumbo; Nicolai S C van Oers Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Poonam Rath; Chengdong Huang; Tao Wang; Tianzhi Wang; Huilin Li; Rafael Prados-Rosales; Olivier Elemento; Arturo Casadevall; Carl F Nathan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mayara F Maggioli; Mitchell V Palmer; Tyler C Thacker; H Martin Vordermeier; W Ray Waters Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Midori Kato-Maeda; Christine Ho; Ben Passarelli; Niaz Banaei; Jennifer Grinsdale; Laura Flores; Jillian Anderson; Megan Murray; Graham Rose; L Masae Kawamura; Nader Pourmand; Muhammad A Tariq; Sebastien Gagneux; Philip C Hopewell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240