Literature DB >> 21161944

A 12-gene genomic instability signature predicts clinical outcomes in multiple cancer types.

Rama K R Mettu1, Ying-Wooi Wan, Jens K Habermann, Thomas Ried, Nancy Lan Guo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Genomic instability, as reflected in specific chromosomal aneuploidies and variation in the nuclear DNA content, is a defining feature of human carcinomas. It is solidly established that the degree of genomic instability influences clinical outcome. We have recently identified a 12-gene expression signature that discerned genomically stable from unstable breast carcinomas. This gene expression signature was also useful to predict, with high accuracy, the clinical course in independent multiple published breast cancer cohorts. From a biological point of view, this result confirmed the central role of genomic instability for a tumor's ability to adapt to external challenges and selective pressure, and hence for continued survival fitness. This prompted us to investigate whether this genomic instability signature could also predict clinical outcome in other cancer types of epithelial origin, including colorectal tumors, non-small cell lung carcinomas, and ovarian cancer.
RESULTS: The results show that the gene expression signature that defines genomic instability and poor outcome in breast cancer contributes significantly more accurate (p<0.05 compared with random prediction) prognostic information in multiple cancer types independent of established clinical parameters. The 12-gene genomic instability signature stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups with distinct postoperative survival in three non-small cell lung cancer cohorts (n=637) in Kaplan-Meier analyses (log-rank p<0.05). It predicted recurrence in colon cancer patients (n=92) with an overall accuracy greater than 69% (p=0.04) in cross-cohort validation. It quantified relapse-free survival in ovarian cancer (n=124; log-rank p<0.05). Functional pathway analysis revealed interactions between the 12 signature genes and well-known cancer hallmarks.
CONCLUSION: The degree of genomic instability has diagnostic and prognostic implications. It is tempting to speculate that pursuing genomic instability therapeutically could provide entry points for a target that is unique to cancer cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21161944      PMCID: PMC3155635          DOI: 10.5301/jbm.2010.6079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   2.659


  35 in total

1.  Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung.

Authors:  Andy J Minn; Gaorav P Gupta; Peter M Siegel; Paula D Bos; Weiping Shu; Dilip D Giri; Agnes Viale; Adam B Olshen; William L Gerald; Joan Massagué
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Oncogenic pathway signatures in human cancers as a guide to targeted therapies.

Authors:  Andrea H Bild; Guang Yao; Jeffrey T Chang; Quanli Wang; Anil Potti; Dawn Chasse; Mary-Beth Joshi; David Harpole; Johnathan M Lancaster; Andrew Berchuck; John A Olson; Jeffrey R Marks; Holly K Dressman; Mike West; Joseph R Nevins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Colon cancer prognosis prediction by gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Alain Barrier; Antoinette Lemoine; Pierre-Yves Boelle; Chantal Tse; Didier Brault; Franck Chiappini; Julia Breittschneider; François Lacaine; Sidney Houry; Michel Huguier; Mark J Van der Laan; Terry Speed; Brigitte Debuire; Antoine Flahault; Sandrine Dudoit
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Stage II colon cancer prognosis prediction by tumor gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Alain Barrier; Pierre-Yves Boelle; François Roser; Jennifer Gregg; Chantal Tse; Didier Brault; François Lacaine; Sidney Houry; Michel Huguier; Brigitte Franc; Antoine Flahault; Antoinette Lemoine; Sandrine Dudoit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Genomic instability and prognosis in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Ulrike Kronenwett; Alexander Ploner; Anders Zetterberg; Jonas Bergh; Per Hall; Gert Auer; Yudi Pawitan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers.

Authors:  Scott L Carter; Aron C Eklund; Isaac S Kohane; Lyndsay N Harris; Zoltan Szallasi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Manganese superoxide dismutase protects the proliferative capacity of confluent normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ehab H Sarsour; Manjula Agarwal; Tej K Pandita; Larry W Oberley; Prabhat C Goswami
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Loss of p21 disrupts p14 ARF-induced G1 cell cycle arrest but augments p14 ARF-induced apoptosis in human carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Philipp G Hemmati; Guillaume Normand; Berlinda Verdoodt; Clarissa von Haefen; Anne Hasenjäger; Dilek Güner; Jana Wendt; Bernd Dörken; Peter T Daniel
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  The N-terminal domain of the Aurora-A Phe-31 variant encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase and mediates ubiquitination of IkappaBalpha.

Authors:  Paraskevi Briassouli; Florence Chan; Spiros Linardopoulos
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Gene expression programs in response to hypoxia: cell type specificity and prognostic significance in human cancers.

Authors:  Jen-Tsan Chi; Zhen Wang; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Edwin H Rodriguez; Marci E Schaner; Ali Salim; Yun Wang; Gunnar B Kristensen; Aslaug Helland; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Amato Giaccia; Michael T Longaker; Trevor Hastie; George P Yang; Marc J van de Vijver; Patrick O Brown
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Cancer chromosomal instability: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  Nicholas McGranahan; Rebecca A Burrell; David Endesfelder; Marco R Novelli; Charles Swanton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  2n or not 2n: Aneuploidy, polyploidy and chromosomal instability in primary and tumor cells.

Authors:  Lauren M Zasadil; Eric M C Britigan; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Six mutator-derived lncRNA signature of genome instability for predicting the clinical outcome of colon cancer.

Authors:  Shujia Chen; Xiaofei Li; Jiachen Zhang; Li Li; Xueqiu Wang; Yinghui Zhu; Lianyi Guo; Jiwei Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-10

4.  Aneuploidy-associated gene expression signatures characterize malignant transformation in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Marco Gerling; Kari Nousiainen; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Stefan Krüger; Britta Fritzsche; Nils Homann; Hans-Peter Bruch; Gert Auer; Uwe J Roblick; Thomas Ried; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 5.  Clinical value of prognosis gene expression signatures in colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona; Antoni Berenguer; David Cordero; Samantha Riccadonna; Xavier Solé; Marta Crous-Bou; Elisabet Guinó; Xavier Sanjuan; Sebastiano Biondo; Antonio Soriano; Giuseppe Jurman; Gabriel Capella; Cesare Furlanello; Victor Moreno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Aneuploidy and chromosomal instability in cancer: a jackpot to chaos.

Authors:  Maybelline Giam; Giulia Rancati
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.130

7.  Genome instability-related long non-coding RNA in clear renal cell carcinoma determined using computational biology.

Authors:  Yutao Wang; Kexin Yan; Linhui Wang; Jianbin Bi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  An array CGH based genomic instability index (G2I) is predictive of clinical outcome in breast cancer and reveals a subset of tumors without lymph node involvement but with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Françoise Bonnet; Mickael Guedj; Natalie Jones; Sana Sfar; Véronique Brouste; Nabila Elarouci; Guillaume Banneau; Béatrice Orsetti; Charlotte Primois; Christine Tunon de Lara; Marc Debled; Isabelle de Mascarel; Charles Theillet; Nicolas Sévenet; Aurélien de Reynies; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Michel Longy
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Genomic instability and colon carcinogenesis: from the perspective of genes.

Authors:  Chinthalapally V Rao; Hiroshi Y Yamada
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Cyclin-dependent kinase-specific activity predicts the prognosis of stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kubo; Takashi Suzuki; Tomoko Matsushima; Hideki Ishihara; Kazuya Uchino; Satoshi Suzuki; Sachiyo Tada; Masahiro Yoshimura; Takashi Kondo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.