Literature DB >> 26701705

A preoperatively predictive difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: experience from a large-scale single center.

Ping Li1, Chang-Ming Huang2, Jian-Xian Lin1, Chao-Hui Zheng1, Jian-Wei Xie1, Jia-Bin Wang1, Jun Lu1, Qi-Yue Chen1, Long-Long Cao1, Mi Lin1, Ru-Hong Tu1, Rui Fu Chen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors that influence the difficulty of performing laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection (SHLND) for gastric cancer and to establish a simple and effective scoring system to predict the surgical difficulty preoperatively.
METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2013, we prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 317 patients with upper- or middle-third gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic spleen-preserving SHLND. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors for surgical difficulty based on the operation time during spleen-preserving SHLND. A logistic regression model was used to identify determinant variables and construct a predictive difficulty scoring system.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that gender, body mass index (BMI), number of splenic lobar arteries (SLAs), and type of SLA were independently predictive factors of operation time. According to these factors, we developed a predictive surgical difficulty scoring system and the difficulty levels are divided into 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 points or more. Based on the relative risk, we stratified the surgical difficulty into the following three divisions: 0 low difficulty, 1-2 intermediate difficulty, and 3 points or more high difficulty. The patients with long operation time accounted for 19.6, 43.6, and 90.9 % for the three groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the logistic regression model and the simplified difficulty scoring prediction model was 0.717 and 0.715, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on four independent risk factors, including gender, BMI, number of SLAs, and type of SLA, we developed a simple and effective scoring system to predict the difficulty of laparoscopic spleen-preserving SHLND preoperatively. This novel scoring system might aid surgeons with different experience in performing operations at different levels of difficulty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Scoring system; Spleen-preserving; Stomach neoplasms; Surgical difficulty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26701705     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4725-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

1.  Spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy at the time of gastrectomy for cancer: technical feasibility and early results.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Daisuke Ban; Minoru Tanabe; Hiromitsu Ito; Yuichiro Otsuka; Hiroyuki Nitta; Yuta Abe; Yasushi Hasegawa; Toshio Katagiri; Chisato Takagi; Osamu Itano; Hironori Kaneko; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.027

3.  Total gastrectomy with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  K Takeuchi; Y Tsuzuki; T Ando; M Sekihara; T Hara; M Yoshikawa; Y Ohno; H Kuwano
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Prognosis of metastatic splenic hilum lymph node in patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy and splenectomy.

Authors:  Keishiro Aoyagi; Kikuo Kouhuji; Motoshi Miyagi; Takuya Imaizumi; Junya Kizaki; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2010-02-27

5.  A prospective randomized study comparing D2 total gastrectomy versus D2 total gastrectomy plus splenectomy in 187 patients with gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Attila Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Jorge Rojas; Italo Braghetto; Juan Carlos Diaz; Fernando Maluenda
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Anatomy of vasculature of 850 spleen specimens and its application in partial splenectomy.

Authors:  D L Liu; S Xia; W Xu; Q Ye; Y Gao; J Qian
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Laparoscopic pancreas- and spleen-preserving D2 lymph node dissection in advanced (cT2) upper-third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hoon Hur; Hae Myung Jeon; Wook Kim
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Association of splenectomy with postoperative complications in patients with proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Authors:  Jürgen Weitz; David P Jaques; Murray Brennan; Martin Karpeh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Predictive factors for surgical complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Ryo Takagawa; Kei Sato; Mayumi Kawamata; Amane Kanazawa; Naoto Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Nagano; Shoichi Fujii; Hidetaka A Ono; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  K Maruyama; M Sasako; T Kinoshita; T Sano; H Katai; K Okajima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  2 in total

1.  Splenic hilar dissection in the treatment of proximal advanced gastric cancer: what is an adequate strategy?

Authors:  Takahiro Kinoshita
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-21

Review 2.  Technical pro & cons of the laparoscopic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Riccardo Rosati; Paolo Parise; Fabio Giannone Codiglione
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.