Literature DB >> 7597019

Adherence to screening examinations for colorectal cancer after diagnosis in a first-degree relative.

J L Richardson1, K Danley, G T Mondrus, D Deapen, T Mack.   

Abstract

Reports of colorectal cancer screening behavior were collected from 83 twin sisters of colorectal cancer cases and compared to the patterns found by national surveys. Prior to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer in a twin, the unaffected cotwins were being screened at rates close to those of the general population. In the years after diagnosis the annual frequency of each exam increased by approximately 15 to 20 percentage points. By the time of response nearly 89% of these cotwins had at least one fecal occult blood test, 90% had at least one digital rectal exam, and 69% had a sigmoidoscopy in comparison to 44, 63, and 27% of the general population, respectively. However, despite the evident familial risk, within the year prior to the report, 42.3% of colorectal cancer twins had had a fecal occult blood test, 44.3% had had a digital rectal exam, and 16% had had a sigmoidoscopy exam (the comparable figures from the general population sample are 14.5, 19.3, and 4%, respectively). The colorectal cotwins have a higher rate of sigmoidoscopy screening than either the National Health Interview Survey or the breast cotwins. Both colorectal and breast cancer cotwins have a higher rate of fecal occult blood test and digital rectal exam than the NHIS sample. This suggests that those at increased risk of cancer in general, are more likely to obtain routine screening including fecal occult blood test and digital rectal exam as part of the physical exam; however, the specialized sigmoidoscopy screening is more likely to be provided to those at most risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7597019     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  13 in total

1.  New endoscopy devices to improve population adherence to colorectal cancer prevention programs.

Authors:  Asimina Gaglia; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

Review 2.  When even people at high risk do not take up colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Screening participation for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer due to family history: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Trevor Lockett; Alex Boussioutas; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening examination for colorectal cancer in an outpatient clinic.

Authors:  S Gölder; W Vogt; H Lichti; H C Rath; A Kullmann; J Schölmerich; F Kullmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Behavioral and economic impact of a familial history of cancers.

Authors:  Francois Eisinger; Carole Tarpin; Laetitia Huiart; Doug Horsman; Laetitia Rabayrol; Remi Didelot; Claire Julian-Reynier; Hagay Sobol
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  A mobile colonoscopic unit for lynch syndrome: trends in surveillance uptake and patient experiences of screening in a developing country.

Authors:  Zandrè Bruwer; Merle Futter; Raj Ramesar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Screening preferences of patients at familial risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Paul C Schroy Iii; Julie T Glick; Patricia A Robinson; Timothy Heeren
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Predicting Incongruence between Self-reported and Documented Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Sample of African American Medicare Recipients.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Janice Burnett; Robert Chapman
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.104

9.  Presence and correlates of racial disparities in adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines.

Authors:  Diana J Burgess; Michelle van Ryn; Joseph Grill; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joan M Griffin; Jennifer Ricards; Sally W Vernon; Deborah A Fisher; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Differences in response to a dietary intervention between the general population and first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Donna McClish; Patrica Carcaise-Edinboro; Hali Esinhart; Diane Baer Wilson; Melanie K Bean
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.