Literature DB >> 21160402

Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Juan S Uribe1, Fernando L Vale, Elias Dakwar.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Literature review.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to examine current intraoperative electromyography (EMG) neurophysiologic monitoring methods and their application in minimally invasive techniques. We will also discuss the recent application of EMG and its anatomic implications to the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive techniques require that the same goals of surgery be achieved, with the hope of decreased morbidity to the patient. Unlike standard open procedures, direct visualization of the anatomy is decreased. To increase the safety of minimally invasive spine surgery, neurophysiological monitoring techniques have been developed.
METHODS: Review of the literature was performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information databases using PUBMED/MEDLINE. All articles in the English language discussing the use of intraoperative EMG monitoring and minimally invasive spine surgery were reviewed. The role of EMG monitoring in special reference to the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach is also described.
RESULTS: In total, 76 articles were identified that discussed the role of neuromonitoring in spine surgery. The majority of articles on EMG and spine surgery discuss the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) for safe and accurate pedicle screw placement. In general, there is a paucity of literature that pertains to intraoperative EMG neuromonitoring and minimally invasive spine surgery. Recently, EMG has been used during minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion. The addition of EMG to the lateral approach has contributed to decrease the complication rate from 30% to less than 1%.
CONCLUSION: In minimally invasive approaches to the spine, the use of EMG IOM might provide additional safety, such as percutaneous pedicle screw placement, where visualization is limited compared with conventional open procedures. In addition to knowledge of the anatomy and image guidance, directional EMG IOM is crucial for safe passage through the psoas muscle during the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21160402     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182027976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Direct lateral access lumbar and thoracolumbar fusion: preliminary results.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Massimo Balsano; Josip Buric; Mary Petruzzi; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Transcranial electrical stimulation as indispensable rearview.

Authors:  Hanneke I Berends; Henricus L Journée; Ilona Rácz; Jan van Loon; Roger Härtl; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sebastian Siller; Constance Raith; Stefan Zausinger; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelenyi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity.

Authors:  Jacob Januszewski; Andrew C Vivas; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

5.  Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?

Authors:  Frederic Jacquot; Daniel Gastambide
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Intraoperative reversal of neuromuscular block with sugammadex or neostigmine during extreme lateral interbody fusion, a novel technique for spine surgery.

Authors:  Milan Adamus; Lumir Hrabalek; Tomas Wanek; Tomas Gabrhelik; Jana Zapletalova
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The learning curve of lateral access lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population: a prospective study.

Authors:  Chong Leslie Lich Ng; Boon Chuan Pang; Paul Julius A Medina; Kimberly-Anne Tan; Selvaraj Dahshaini; Li-Zhen Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A MRI study of lumbar plexus with respect to the lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Lei He; Zhuang Kang; Wen-Jie Tang; Li-Min Rong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.