Literature DB >> 25749688

A MRI study of lumbar plexus with respect to the lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine.

Lei He1, Zhuang Kang2, Wen-Jie Tang2, Li-Min Rong3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative position between lumbar plexus and access corridor of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas lumbar approach, as well as the approach safety.
METHODS: Three-dimensional fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (3D FIESTA) sequence images of lumbar spine were obtained from 58 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases for reconstruction to analyze the distribution of lumbar plexus from L1-L2 to L4-L5 level with respect to the transpsoas lumbar approach. The axial image distance (AID) between the anterior edge of lumbar plexus and the sagittal central perpendicular line (SCPL) of disc was measured. SCPL was drawn perpendicularly to the sagittal plane of intervertebral disc and it passed through its central point, which is initial dilator trajectory for transpsoas approach. As related to the SCPL of disc, the distance with a positive value was set to indicate neural tissue posterior to it, while anterior to it was represented by a negative value.
RESULTS: In relation to SCPL of disc, the AID of lumbar plexus was measured 13.01 ± 1.70, 8.61 ± 2.26, 1.12 ± 2.37 and -5.42 ± 3.26 mm from L1-L2 to L4-L5 level, respectively, while the AID of genitofemoral nerve was recorded -1.13 ± 2.87, -5.78 ± 2.33 and -10.53 ± 3.30 mm from L2-L3 to L4-L5 level accordingly.
CONCLUSION: With respect to the SCPL of disc, a trajectory of guide wire or a radiographic reference landmark to place working channel, lumbar plexus lies posteriorly to it from L1-L2 to L3-L4 level and shifts anteriorly to it at L4-L5 level, while genitofemoral nerve locates anteriorly to the SCPL from L2-L3 to L4-L5 level. Neural retraction may take place during sequential dilation of access corridor especially at L4-L5 level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Lateral transpsoas approach; Lumbar plexus; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25749688     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3847-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

1.  An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Takatomo Moro; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Shin-ichi Konno; Hiroyuki Yaginuma
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The lumbosacral plexus: anatomic considerations for minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach.

Authors:  Patrick Guérin; Ibrahim Obeid; Anouar Bourghli; Thibault Masquefa; Stéphane Luc; Olivier Gille; Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Nicolas Arredondo; Elias Dakwar; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-08

4.  Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.

Authors:  W Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jamie Patterson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Anatomic mapping of lumbar nerve roots during a direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Kelley Banagan; Daniel Gelb; Kornelis Poelstra; Steven Ludwig
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Three-dimensional fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition MRI and its diagnostic value for lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Osamu Nemoto; Akira Fujikawa; Atsuko Tachibana
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-01

7.  Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review.

Authors:  Jim A Youssef; Paul C McAfee; Catherine A Patty; Erin Raley; Spencer DeBauche; Erin Shucosky; Liana Chotikul
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach.

Authors:  Antoine G Tohmeh; William Blake Rodgers; Mark D Peterson
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-12-17

9.  Volumetric myelographic magnetic resonance imaging to localize difficult-to-find spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Authors:  Jonathan M Morris; Timothy J Kaufmann; Norbert G Campeau; Harry J Cloft; Giuseppe Lanzino
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-01-21

10.  Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile.

Authors:  Reginald Q Knight; Paul Schwaegler; David Hanscom; Jeffery Roh
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European spine journal, 2015.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Haocheng Xu; Bo Yin; Hongyue Tao; Shuo Yang; Chi Sun; Yitao Wang; Jun Yin; Minghao Shao; Hongli Wang; Xinlei Xia; Xiaosheng Ma; Feizhou Lu; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lateral lumbar vertebral body screw predisposes to neuralgia after limb-salvage surgery for pelvic tumors: a single-center, retrospective study of 349 cases.

Authors:  Haijie Liang; Dasen Li; Wei Guo; Rongli Yang; Xiaodong Tang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbar plexus nervous distortion in XLIF® approach: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Carlo Mandelli; Elena Virginia Colombo; Giovanni Marco Sicuri; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Lumbar plexus safe working zones with lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dallas E Kramer; Cody Woodhouse; Mena G Kerolus; Alexander Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Psoas Morphology Differs between Supine and Sitting Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lumbar Spine: Implications for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Bryan M Beaubrun; Evan Isaacs; John Moon; Peter Zhou; Sam Horn; Gregory Poorman; Jared C Tishelman; Louis M Day; Thomas J Errico; Peter G Passias; Themistocles Protopsaltis
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

7.  Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study.

Authors:  Chunneng Huang; Zhengkuan Xu; Fangcai Li; Qixin Chen
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-06-26

8.  Anterior Thigh Pain Following Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: Multivariate Analysis from a Prospective Case Series.

Authors:  Sam Yeol Chang; Woo Seok Lee; Sujung Mok; Sung Cheol Park; Hyoungmin Kim; Bong-Soon Chang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-07-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.