PURPOSE: Lateral access lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive technique that has an increasing popularity. It offers unique advantages and circumvents risk of certain serious complications encountered in other conventional spinal approaches. This study provides a statistical analysis defining the lateral access learning curve in the Asian population. METHODS: This prospective study included 32 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF from April 2012 to August 2014. The surgeries were performed by two senior spine surgeons and follow-up was conducted at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months and 1 year post-operation. RESULTS: The breakpoint in operating time occurred at the 22nd level operated, from a mean of 71 min in the early phase group to a mean of 42 min in the steady state group. LLIF at L4/5 level is technically more demanding but technically feasible as competency is achieved. CONCLUSIONS: During the learning process, there was no compromise of perioperative or clinical outcomes. It should be feasibly incorporated into a spine surgeon's repertoire of procedures for the lumbar spine.
PURPOSE: Lateral access lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive technique that has an increasing popularity. It offers unique advantages and circumvents risk of certain serious complications encountered in other conventional spinal approaches. This study provides a statistical analysis defining the lateral access learning curve in the Asian population. METHODS: This prospective study included 32 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF from April 2012 to August 2014. The surgeries were performed by two senior spine surgeons and follow-up was conducted at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months and 1 year post-operation. RESULTS: The breakpoint in operating time occurred at the 22nd level operated, from a mean of 71 min in the early phase group to a mean of 42 min in the steady state group. LLIF at L4/5 level is technically more demanding but technically feasible as competency is achieved. CONCLUSIONS: During the learning process, there was no compromise of perioperative or clinical outcomes. It should be feasibly incorporated into a spine surgeon's repertoire of procedures for the lumbar spine.
Authors: Alexander Aichmair; Marios G Lykissas; Federico P Girardi; Andrew A Sama; Darren R Lebl; Fadi Taher; Frank P Cammisa; Alexander P Hughes Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 3.468