Literature DB >> 23657674

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?

Frederic Jacquot1, Daniel Gastambide.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Interbody spine fusion with cages was first described by Bagby and has been performed for a long time now in a variety of different conditions. We developed a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar fusion technique based on the principles of Kambin and an original titanium cage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2004 to 2010, 57 patients were operated on, 17 patients were male with a mean age of 50.29 years (range 34-71 years) and 40 were female with a mean age of 57.42 years (29-90 years). Nineteen patients had a previous operation. Patients were operated on under local anaesthesia in the prone position under image intensifier and a transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic approach.
RESULTS: Fifty cases had a bilateral cage through a bilateral endoscopic approach, and seven cases had a unilateral endoscopic approach only; of those, three cases had only one cage. Eleven patients had a contemporary posterior plate fixation at the same time of the endoscopic cage fusion. Eight patients had a postoperative radicular pain with paresthesias. Asymptomatic migration of the cages occurred in two cases and symptomatic migration requiring a conventional secondary reoperation in 13 cases after a mean delay of eight months (range three to 36 months). The mean ODI after two years or more was 34.3 % (initial ODI 69.4 %).
CONCLUSIONS: The technique was introduced in our practice to take care of difficult or grave co-morbidity patients, and some patients had excellent lasting results following a very short procedure and hospital stay. However, given the 36 % complication rate in this series, we do not recommend it unless decisive technical improvements are made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23657674      PMCID: PMC3728384          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1905-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  An assistive image-guided surgical robot system using O-arm fluoroscopy for pedicle screw insertion: preliminary and cadaveric study.

Authors:  Sungmin Kim; Jaeheon Chung; Byung-Ju Yi; Young Soo Kim
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Fernando L Vale; Elias Dakwar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; Scott Hodges; S Craig Humphreys
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Sacropelvic fixation: two case reports of a new percutaneous technique.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Timothy F Witham; Khaled M Kebaish
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Navigated percutaneous lumbosacral interbody fusion: a feasibility study with three-dimensional surgical simulation and cadaveric experiment.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Dang Q S Le; Haisheng Li; Miao Wang; Cody Eric Bünger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  The current state of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Choll W Kim; Krzysztof Siemionow; D Greg Anderson; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Can computer-assisted surgery reduce the effective dose for spinal fusion and sacroiliac screw insertion?

Authors:  Michael David Kraus; Gert Krischak; Peter Keppler; Florian T Gebhard; Uwe H W Schuetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion with B-Twin expandable spinal spacer.

Authors:  Nuzhao Yao; Wenjun Wang; Yonghua Liu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Robert E Isaacs; Jonathan Hyde; J Allan Goodrich; William Blake Rodgers; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron; Gowriharan Thaiyananthan; Kunwar Khalsa; Theodore B Goldstein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-10
View more
  22 in total

1.  Ligament, nerve, and blood vessel anatomy of the lateral zone of the lumbar intervertebral foramina.

Authors:  Shi-Guo Yuan; You-Liang Wen; Pei Zhang; Yi-Kai Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Full endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FELIF): technical note.

Authors:  Myung Soo Youn; Jong Ki Shin; Tae Sik Goh; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Innovative Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Instability: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Peng Yin; Yi Ding; Lijin Zhou; Chunyang Xu; Haifeng Gao; Daming Pang; Yong Hai; Jincai Yang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  A Narrative Review of Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Uniportal Facet-Preserving Trans-Kambin Endoscopic Fusion and Uniportal Facet-Sacrificing Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Hyeun Sung Kim; Pang Hung Wu; Koichi Sairyo; Il-Tae Jang
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

5.  Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar decompression & foraminoplasty: a 10 year prospective survivability outcome study of the treatment of foraminal stenosis and failed back surgery.

Authors:  Martin T N Knight; Ingrid Jago; Christopher Norris; Lynne Midwinter; Christopher Boynes
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Sang-Ho Lee; H Yener Erken; Junseok Bae
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note and Preliminary Clinical Experience with 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Junlong Wu; Huan Liu; Shengxiang Ao; Wenjie Zheng; Changqing Li; Haiyin Li; Yong Pan; Chao Zhang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons.

Authors:  Ryan Lohre; Jeffrey C Wang; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Danny P Goel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

9.  Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Endoscopic Disc Drilling Preparation Technique for Symptomatic Foraminal Stenosis Secondary to Severe Collapsed Disc Space: A Clinical and Computer Tomographic Study with Technical Note.

Authors:  Pang Hung Wu; Hyeun Sung Kim; Yeon Jin Lee; Dae Hwan Kim; Jun Hyung Lee; Jun Bok Jeon; Harshavardhan Dilip Raorane; Il-Tae Jang
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-06-15

10.  Unilateral Laminectomy by Endoscopy in Central Lumbar Canal Spinal Stenosis: Technical Note and Early Outcomes.

Authors:  Fenglong Sun; Qingchen Liang; Ming Yan; Hongqing Wang; Zuyao Liu; Fu Li; Jie Dong; Tiejun Liu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.