Literature DB >> 21159002

Haploids adapt faster than diploids across a range of environments.

A C Gerstein1, L A Cleathero, M A Mandegar, S P Otto.   

Abstract

Despite a great deal of theoretical attention, we have limited empirical data about how ploidy influences the rate of adaptation. We evolved isogenic haploid and diploid populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for 200 generations in seven different environments. We measured the competitive fitness of all ancestral and evolved lines against a common competitor and find that in all seven environments, haploid lines adapted faster than diploids, significantly so in three environments. We apply theory that relates the rates of adaptation and measured effective population sizes to the properties of beneficial mutations. We obtained rough estimates of the average selection coefficients in haploids between 2% and 10% for these first selected mutations. Results were consistent with semi-dominant to dominant mutations in four environments and recessive to additive mutations in two other environments. These results are consistent with theory that predicts haploids should evolve faster than diploids at large population sizes.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21159002     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02188.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  26 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary biology through the lens of budding yeast comparative genomics.

Authors:  Souhir Marsit; Jean-Baptiste Leducq; Éléonore Durand; Axelle Marchant; Marie Filteau; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Ploidy tug-of-war: Evolutionary and genetic environments influence the rate of ploidy drive in a human fungal pathogen.

Authors:  Aleeza C Gerstein; Heekyung Lim; Judith Berman; Meleah A Hickman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Differential sexual survival of Drosophila melanogaster on copper sulfate.

Authors:  Michael A Balinski; Ronny C Woodruff
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Increase in viability due to the accumulation of X chromosome mutations in Drosophila melanogaster males.

Authors:  Ronny C Woodruff; Michael A Balinski
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 5.  Genomic investigations of evolutionary dynamics and epistasis in microbial evolution experiments.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Jerison; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Heterozygote Advantage Is a Common Outcome of Adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Diamantis Sellis; Daniel J Kvitek; Barbara Dunn; Gavin Sherlock; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Shift and adapt: the costs and benefits of karyotype variations.

Authors:  Aleeza C Gerstein; Judith Berman
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  The genome-wide rate and spectrum of spontaneous mutations differ between haploid and diploid yeast.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Linnea Sandell; Christopher G James; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Reduction of ethanol yield and improvement of glycerol formation by adaptive evolution of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae under hyperosmotic conditions.

Authors:  Valentin Tilloy; Anne Ortiz-Julien; Sylvie Dequin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Phenotypic and molecular evolution across 10,000 generations in laboratory budding yeast populations.

Authors:  Milo S Johnson; Shreyas Gopalakrishnan; Juhee Goyal; Megan E Dillingham; Christopher W Bakerlee; Parris T Humphrey; Tanush Jagdish; Elizabeth R Jerison; Katya Kosheleva; Katherine R Lawrence; Jiseon Min; Alief Moulana; Angela M Phillips; Julia C Piper; Ramya Purkanti; Artur Rego-Costa; Michael J McDonald; Alex N Nguyen Ba; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.