Literature DB >> 24532067

Reduction of ethanol yield and improvement of glycerol formation by adaptive evolution of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae under hyperosmotic conditions.

Valentin Tilloy1, Anne Ortiz-Julien, Sylvie Dequin.   

Abstract

There is a strong demand from the wine industry for methodologies to reduce the alcohol content of wine without compromising wine's sensory characteristics. We assessed the potential of adaptive laboratory evolution strategies under hyperosmotic stress for generation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with enhanced glycerol and reduced ethanol yields. Experimental evolution on KCl resulted, after 200 generations, in strains that had higher glycerol and lower ethanol production than the ancestral strain. This major metabolic shift was accompanied by reduced fermentative capacities, suggesting a trade-off between high glycerol production and fermentation rate. Several evolved strains retaining good fermentation performance were selected. These strains produced more succinate and 2,3-butanediol than the ancestral strain and did not accumulate undesirable organoleptic compounds, such as acetate, acetaldehyde, or acetoin. They survived better under osmotic stress and glucose starvation conditions than the ancestral strain, suggesting that the forces that drove the redirection of carbon fluxes involved a combination of osmotic and salt stresses and carbon limitation. To further decrease the ethanol yield, a breeding strategy was used, generating intrastrain hybrids that produced more glycerol than the evolved strain. Pilot-scale fermentation on Syrah using evolved and hybrid strains produced wine with 0.6% (vol/vol) and 1.3% (vol/vol) less ethanol, more glycerol and 2,3-butanediol, and less acetate than the ancestral strain. This work demonstrates that the combination of adaptive evolution and breeding is a valuable alternative to rational design for remodeling the yeast metabolic network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24532067      PMCID: PMC3993162          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03710-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  32 in total

1.  Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR.

Authors:  C Huxley; E D Green; I Dunham
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to generate strains with enhanced glycerol production.

Authors:  D R Kutyna; C Varela; G A Stanley; A R Borneman; P A Henschke; P J Chambers
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Reduced pyruvate decarboxylase and increased glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD+] levels enhance glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E Nevoigt; U Stahl
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.239

4.  Effects of GPD1 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae commercial wine yeast strains lacking ALD6 genes.

Authors:  Brigitte Cambon; Virginie Monteil; Fabienne Remize; Carole Camarasa; Sylvie Dequin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effects of fermentation temperature on the strain population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ma Jesús Torija; Nicolas Rozès; Montse Poblet; José Manuel Guillamón; Albert Mas
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Evolutionary engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with increased in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway.

Authors:  Axelle Cadière; Anne Ortiz-Julien; Carole Camarasa; Sylvie Dequin
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 9.783

7.  Generation and characterisation of stable ethanol-tolerant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dragana Stanley; Sarah Fraser; Paul J Chambers; Peter Rogers; Grant A Stanley
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Carbon source induces growth of stationary phase yeast cells, independent of carbon source metabolism.

Authors:  D Granot; M Snyder
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.239

9.  Correlation between TCA cycle flux and glucose uptake rate during respiro-fermentative growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jan Heyland; Jianan Fu; Lars M Blank
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape.

Authors:  Daniel J Kvitek; Gavin Sherlock
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Exploiting budding yeast natural variation for industrial processes.

Authors:  Francisco A Cubillos
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 2.  The emergence of adaptive laboratory evolution as an efficient tool for biological discovery and industrial biotechnology.

Authors:  Troy E Sandberg; Michael J Salazar; Liam L Weng; Bernhard O Palsson; Adam M Feist
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 9.783

Review 3.  Lager yeast comes of age.

Authors:  Jürgen Wendland
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2014-08-01

4.  Hybridization within Saccharomyces Genus Results in Homoeostasis and Phenotypic Novelty in Winemaking Conditions.

Authors:  Telma da Silva; Warren Albertin; Christine Dillmann; Marina Bely; Stéphane la Guerche; Christophe Giraud; Sylvie Huet; Delphine Sicard; Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede; Dominique de Vienne; Philippe Marullo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The impact of oxygen on the final alcohol content of wine fermented by a mixed starter culture.

Authors:  Pilar Morales; Virginia Rojas; Manuel Quirós; Ramon Gonzalez
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Sequential Fermentation with Selected Immobilized Non-Saccharomyces Yeast for Reduction of Ethanol Content in Wine.

Authors:  Laura Canonico; Francesca Comitini; Lucia Oro; Maurizio Ciani
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Starmerella bombicola and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Wine Sequential Fermentation in Aeration Condition: Evaluation of Ethanol Reduction and Analytical Profile.

Authors:  Laura Canonico; Edoardo Galli; Alice Agarbati; Francesca Comitini; Maurizio Ciani
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-11

Review 8.  Truth in wine yeast.

Authors:  Ramon Gonzalez; Pilar Morales
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Research highlights for issue 3.

Authors:  Britt Koskella
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Diversity of flux distribution in central carbon metabolism of S. cerevisiae strains from diverse environments.

Authors:  Thibault Nidelet; Pascale Brial; Carole Camarasa; Sylvie Dequin
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.