Literature DB >> 18584219

Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure.

Hans-Joachim Wilke1, J Drumm, K Häussler, C Mack, W-I Steudel, A Kettler.   

Abstract

Interspinous implants are used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis or facet joint arthritis. The aims of implanting interspinous devices are to unload the facet joints, restore foraminal height and provide stability especially in extension but still allow motion. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare four different interspinous implants--Colfex, Wallis, Diam and X-Stop--in terms of their three-dimensional flexibility and the intradiscal pressure. Twenty-four human lumbar spine specimens were divided into four equal groups and tested with pure moments in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation: (1) intact, (2) defect, (3) after implantation. Range of motion and the intradiscal pressure were determined. In each implant-group the defect caused an increase in range of motion by about 8% in lateral bending to 18% in axial rotation. Implantation had similar effects with all four implants. In extension, Coflex, Wallis, Diam, and X-Stop all overcompensated the instability caused by the defect and allowed about 50% of the range of motion of the intact state. In contrast, in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation the values of the range of motion stayed about the values of the defect state. Similarly the intradiscal pressure after implantation was similar to that of the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation but much smaller during extension. All tested interspinous implants had a similar effect on the flexibility: they strongly stabilized and reduced the intradiscal pressure in extension, but had almost no effect in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18584219      PMCID: PMC2518774          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0657-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures.

Authors:  Kyle E Swanson; Derek P Lindsey; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment.

Authors:  W Schmoelz; J F Huber; T Nydegger; L Claes; H J Wilke
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

3.  The effect of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures.

Authors:  Thomas E Whitesides
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  R J Minns; W K Walsh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis.

Authors:  A C Simotas; F J Dorey; K K Hansraj; F Cammisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  M R Zindrick; L L Wiltse; E H Widell; J C Thomas; W R Holland; B T Field; C W Spencer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The relationship between disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and stability of the degenerative lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Fujiwara; K Tamai; H S An; T Kurihashi; T H Lim; H Yoshida; K Saotome
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-10

8.  Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  J A Turner; M Ersek; L Herron; R Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?

Authors:  A Kettler; L Liakos; B Haegele; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Derek P Lindsey; Kyle E Swanson; Paul Fuchs; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability.

Authors:  Johannes Holinka; Petra Krepler; Michael Matzner; Josef G Grohs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Biomechanics of interspinous spacers].

Authors:  H-J Wilke; J Drumm; K Häussler; C Mack; A Kettler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Long-term results, status of studies and differential indication regarding the DIAM implant].

Authors:  F A Krappel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Pedicle screw-based systems for dynamic stabilization : An insight into the philosophy, technique, indications and success of these systems].

Authors:  J Richolt; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Computed tomography measurements of the lumbar spinous processes and interspinous space.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Timmo Koy; Marc Röllinghoff; Jan Siewe; Thomas Kreitz; Daniel Müller; Christopher Bangard; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with the Accuflex rod system as a stand-alone device: experience in 20 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alejandro Reyes-Sánchez; Barón Zárate-Kalfópulos; Isabel Ramírez-Mora; Luis Miguel Rosales-Olivarez; Armando Alpizar-Aguirre; Guadalupe Sánchez-Bringas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: an in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Miranda N Shaw; Lawrence J Berglund; Kristin D Zhao; Ralph E Gay; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [Interspinous implant "InSWing®" for the lumbar spine].

Authors:  Michael Pfeiffer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  [Treatment of dynamic spinal canal stenosis with an interspinous spacer].

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Rudolf Beisse; H Michael Mayer; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.