Literature DB >> 21151829

Stable, intelligible ultrasonic strain imaging.

Andrew Gee1, Joel Lindop, Graham Treece, Richard Prager, Susan Freeman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Freehand quasistatic strain imaging can reveal qualitative information about tissue stiffness with good spatial accuracy. Clinical trials, however, repeatedly cite instability and variable signal-to-noise ratio as significant drawbacks.
METHODS: This study investigates three post-processing strategies for quasistatic strain imaging. Normalisation divides the strain by an estimate of the stress field, the intention being to reduce sensitivity to variable applied stress. Persistence aims to improve the signal-to-noise ratio by time-averaging multiple frames. The persistence scheme presented in this article operates at the pixel level, weighting each frame's contribution by an estimate of the strain precision. Precision-based display presents the clinician with an image in which regions of indeterminate strain are obscured behind a colour wash. This is achieved using estimates of strain precision that are faithfully propagated through the various stages of signal processing. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The post-processing strategy is evaluated qualitatively on scans of a breast biopsy phantom and in vivo head and neck examinations. Strain images processed in this manner are observed to benefit from improved stability and signal-to-noise ratio. There are, however, limitations. In unusual though conceivable circumstances, the normalisation procedure might suppress genuine stiffness variations evident in the unprocessed strain images. In different circumstances, the raw strain images might fail to capture significant stiffness variations, a situation that no amount of post-processing can improve.
CONCLUSION: The clinical utility of freehand quasistatic strain imaging can be improved by normalisation, precision-weighted pixel-level persistence and precision-based display. The resulting images are stable and generally exhibit a better signal-to-noise ratio than any of the original, unprocessed strain images.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21151829      PMCID: PMC2999902          DOI: 10.1179/174313408X320932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  18 in total

Review 1.  Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues.

Authors:  James F Greenleaf; Mostafa Fatemi; Michael Insana
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping.

Authors:  Jérémy Bercoff; Mickaël Tanter; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: I. Theoretical foundation.

Authors:  Gearóid P Berry; Jeffrey C Bamber; Cecil G Armstrong; Naomi R Miller; Paul E Barbone
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers.

Authors:  Dawn M Regner; Gina K Hesley; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Marilyn J Morton; Michelle R Nordland; Duane D Meixner; Timothy J Hall; Michael A Farrell; Jayawant N Mandrekar; W Scott Harmsen; J William Charboneau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Estimation of displacement location for enhanced strain imaging.

Authors:  Joel E Lindop; Graham M Treece; Andrew H Gee; Richard W Prager
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; I Céspedes; H Ponnekanti; Y Yazdi; X Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 7.  Viscoelastic imaging of breast tumor microenvironment with ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael F Insana; Claire Pellot-Barakat; Mallika Sridhar; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; D J Lomas; P J Rossman; J F Greenleaf; A Manduca; R L Ehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Measurement of soft tissue motion using correlation between A-scans.

Authors:  R J Dickinson; C R Hill
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results.

Authors:  B S Garra; E I Cespedes; J Ophir; S R Spratt; R A Zuurbier; C M Magnant; M F Pennanen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Initial clinical experience of an ultrasonic strain imaging system with novel noise-masking capability.

Authors:  L Chen; S J Freeman; A H Gee; R J Housden; R W Prager; R Sinnatamby; G M Treece
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Real-time quasi-static ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Graham Treece; Joel Lindop; Lujie Chen; James Housden; Richard Prager; Andrew Gee
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.906

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.