Literature DB >> 16616601

Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: I. Theoretical foundation.

Gearóid P Berry1, Jeffrey C Bamber, Cecil G Armstrong, Naomi R Miller, Paul E Barbone.   

Abstract

The ultrasonic measurement and imaging of tissue elasticity is currently under wide investigation and development as a clinical tool for the assessment of a broad range of diseases, but little account in this field has yet been taken of the fact that soft tissue is porous and contains mobile fluid. The ability to squeeze fluid out of tissue may have implications for conventional elasticity imaging, and may present opportunities for new investigative tools. When a homogeneous, isotropic, fluid-saturated poroelastic material with a linearly elastic solid phase and incompressible solid and fluid constituents is subjected to stress, the behaviour of the induced internal strain field is influenced by three material constants: the Young's modulus (E(s)) and Poisson's ratio (nu(s)) of the solid matrix and the permeability (k) of the solid matrix to the pore fluid. New analytical expressions were derived and used to model the time-dependent behaviour of the strain field inside simulated homogeneous cylindrical samples of such a poroelastic material undergoing sustained unconfined compression. A model-based reconstruction technique was developed to produce images of parameters related to the poroelastic material constants (E(s), nu(s), k) from a comparison of the measured and predicted time-dependent spatially varying radial strain. Tests of the method using simulated noisy strain data showed that it is capable of producing three unique parametric images: an image of the Poisson's ratio of the solid matrix, an image of the axial strain (which was not time-dependent subsequent to the application of the compression) and an image representing the product of the aggregate modulus E(s)(1-nu(s))/(1+nu(s))(1-2nu(s)) of the solid matrix and the permeability of the solid matrix to the pore fluid. The analytical expressions were further used to numerically validate a finite element model and to clarify previous work on poroelastography.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16616601     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  14 in total

1.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

Review 2.  Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity.

Authors:  Peter N T Wells; Hai-Dong Liang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Real-time quasi-static ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Graham Treece; Joel Lindop; Lujie Chen; James Housden; Richard Prager; Andrew Gee
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Stable, intelligible ultrasonic strain imaging.

Authors:  Andrew Gee; Joel Lindop; Graham Treece; Richard Prager; Susan Freeman
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2008-11-01

5.  Magnetic resonance poroelastography: an algorithm for estimating the mechanical properties of fluid-saturated soft tissues.

Authors:  Phillip R Perriñez; Francis E Kennedy; Elijah E W Van Houten; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem.

Authors:  M M Doyley
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Quasi-Static Ultrasound Elastography.

Authors:  Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Clin       Date:  2009-07

8.  Design and Testing of a Single-Element Ultrasound Viscoelastography System for Point-of-Care Edema Quantification.

Authors:  John J Pitre; Leo B Koziol; Grant H Kruger; Alan Vollmer; Jonathan Ophir; Jean-Jacques Ammann; William F Weitzel; Joseph L Bull
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  Acoustic waves in medical imaging and diagnostics.

Authors:  Armen P Sarvazyan; Matthew W Urban; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Elastographic Assessment of Xenograft Pancreatic Tumors.

Authors:  Hexuan Wang; Michael D Nieskoski; Kayla Marra; Jason R Gunn; Stuart B Trembly; Brian W Pogue; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.