Literature DB >> 21150885

EPIBLASTER-fast exhaustive two-locus epistasis detection strategy using graphical processing units.

Tony Kam-Thong1, Darina Czamara, Koji Tsuda, Karsten Borgwardt, Cathryn M Lewis, Angelika Erhardt-Lehmann, Bernhard Hemmer, Peter Rieckmann, Markus Daake, Frank Weber, Christiane Wolf, Andreas Ziegler, Benno Pütz, Florian Holsboer, Bernhard Schölkopf, Bertram Müller-Myhsok.   

Abstract

Detection of epistatic interaction between loci has been postulated to provide a more in-depth understanding of the complex biological and biochemical pathways underlying human diseases. Studying the interaction between two loci is the natural progression following traditional and well-established single locus analysis. However, the added costs and time duration required for the computation involved have thus far deterred researchers from pursuing a genome-wide analysis of epistasis. In this paper, we propose a method allowing such analysis to be conducted very rapidly. The method, dubbed EPIBLASTER, is applicable to case-control studies and consists of a two-step process in which the difference in Pearson's correlation coefficients is computed between controls and cases across all possible SNP pairs as an indication of significant interaction warranting further analysis. For the subset of interactions deemed potentially significant, a second-stage analysis is performed using the likelihood ratio test from the logistic regression to obtain the P-value for the estimated coefficients of the individual effects and the interaction term. The algorithm is implemented using the parallel computational capability of commercially available graphical processing units to greatly reduce the computation time involved. In the current setup and example data sets (211 cases, 222 controls, 299468 SNPs; and 601 cases, 825 controls, 291095 SNPs), this coefficient evaluation stage can be completed in roughly 1 day. Our method allows for exhaustive and rapid detection of significant SNP pair interactions without imposing significant marginal effects of the single loci involved in the pair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21150885      PMCID: PMC3060319          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  11 in total

Review 1.  Mathematical multi-locus approaches to localizing complex human trait genes.

Authors:  Josephine Hoh; Jurg Ott
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  SHEsisEpi, a GPU-enhanced genome-wide SNP-SNP interaction scanning algorithm, efficiently reveals the risk genetic epistasis in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Xiaohan Hu; Qiang Liu; Zhao Zhang; Zhiqiang Li; Shilin Wang; Lin He; Yongyong Shi
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 25.617

3.  Evidence for VAV2 and ZNF433 as susceptibility genes for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sandra Nischwitz; Sabine Cepok; Antje Kroner; Christiane Wolf; Matthias Knop; Felix Müller-Sarnowski; Hildegard Pfister; Darina Roeske; Peter Rieckmann; Bernhard Hemmer; Marcus Ising; Manfred Uhr; Thomas Bettecken; Florian Holsboer; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Frank Weber
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; Peter Donnelly; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-03-27       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Contrasting linkage-disequilibrium patterns between cases and controls as a novel association-mapping method.

Authors:  Dmitri V Zaykin; Zhaoling Meng; Margaret G Ehm
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Test for interaction between two unlinked loci.

Authors:  Jinying Zhao; Li Jin; Momiao Xiong
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A genotype-based approach to assessing the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Stefan Wellek; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  The gputools package enables GPU computing in R.

Authors:  Joshua Buckner; Justin Wilson; Mark Seligman; Brian Athey; Stanley Watson; Fan Meng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  TMEM132D, a new candidate for anxiety phenotypes: evidence from human and mouse studies.

Authors:  A Erhardt; L Czibere; D Roeske; S Lucae; P G Unschuld; S Ripke; M Specht; M A Kohli; S Kloiber; M Ising; A Heck; H Pfister; P Zimmermann; R Lieb; B Pütz; M Uhr; P Weber; J M Deussing; M Gonik; M Bunck; M S Kebler; E Frank; C Hohoff; K Domschke; P Krakowitzky; W Maier; B Bandelow; C Jacob; J Deckert; S Schreiber; J Strohmaier; M Nöthen; S Cichon; M Rietschel; T Bettecken; M E Keck; R Landgraf; B Müller-Myhsok; F Holsboer; E B Binder
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  FastEpistasis: a high performance computing solution for quantitative trait epistasis.

Authors:  Thierry Schüpbach; Ioannis Xenarios; Sven Bergmann; Karen Kapur
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  42 in total

1.  Genome-wide interaction analysis reveals replicated epistatic effects on brain structure.

Authors:  Derrek P Hibar; Jason L Stein; Neda Jahanshad; Omid Kohannim; Xue Hua; Arthur W Toga; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  MatrixEpistasis: ultrafast, exhaustive epistasis scan for quantitative traits with covariate adjustment.

Authors:  Shijia Zhu; Gang Fang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Integrated pathway and epistasis analysis reveals interactive effect of genetic variants at TERF1 and AFAP1L2 loci on melanoma risk.

Authors:  Myriam Brossard; Shenying Fang; Christopher I Amos; Florence Demenais; Amaury Vaysse; Qingyi Wei; Wei V Chen; Hamida Mohamdi; Eve Maubec; Nolwenn Lavielle; Pilar Galan; Mark Lathrop; Marie-Françoise Avril; Jeffrey E Lee
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Combinations of genetic data in a study of oral cancer.

Authors:  Erling Mellerup; Gert Lykke Moeller; Pinaki Mondal; Susanta Roychoudhury
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2015-09

5.  Testing gene-gene interactions in genome wide association studies.

Authors:  Jie Kate Hu; Xianlong Wang; Pei Wang
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 6.  Practical aspects of genome-wide association interaction analysis.

Authors:  Elena S Gusareva; Kristel Van Steen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  An examination of single nucleotide polymorphism selection prioritization strategies for tests of gene-gene interaction.

Authors:  Valentina Moskvina; Nick Craddock; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Tony Kam-Thong; Elaine Green; Peter Holmans; Michael J Owen; Michael C O'Donovan
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  Network approaches to systems biology analysis of complex disease: integrative methods for multi-omics data.

Authors:  Jingwen Yan; Shannon L Risacher; Li Shen; Andrew J Saykin
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

9.  Ultrafast genome-wide scan for SNP-SNP interactions in common complex disease.

Authors:  Snehit Prabhu; Itsik Pe'er
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 10.  Detecting epistasis in human complex traits.

Authors:  Wen-Hua Wei; Gibran Hemani; Chris S Haley
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.