Literature DB >> 17033960

Test for interaction between two unlinked loci.

Jinying Zhao1, Li Jin, Momiao Xiong.   

Abstract

Despite the growing consensus on the importance of testing gene-gene interactions in genetic studies of complex diseases, the effect of gene-gene interactions has often been defined as a deviance from genetic additive effects, which is essentially treated as a residual term in genetic analysis and leads to low power in detecting the presence of interacting effects. To what extent the definition of gene-gene interaction at population level reflects the genes' biochemical or physiological interaction remains a mystery. In this article, we introduce a novel definition and a new measure of gene-gene interaction between two unlinked loci (or genes). We developed a general theory for studying linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns in disease population under two-locus disease models. The properties of using the LD measure in a disease population as a function of the measure of gene-gene interaction between two unlinked loci were also investigated. We examined how interaction between two loci creates LD in a disease population and showed that the mathematical formulation of the new definition for gene-gene interaction between two loci was similar to that of the LD between two loci. This finding motived us to develop an LD-based statistic to detect gene-gene interaction between two unlinked loci. The null distribution and type I error rates of the LD-based statistic for testing gene-gene interaction were validated using extensive simulation studies. We found that the new test statistic was more powerful than the traditional logistic regression under three two-locus disease models and demonstrated that the power of the test statistic depends on the measure of gene-gene interaction. We also investigated the impact of using tagging SNPs for testing interaction on the power to detect interaction between two unlinked loci. Finally, to evaluate the performance of our new method, we applied the LD-based statistic to two published data sets. Our results showed that the P values of the LD-based statistic were smaller than those obtained by other approaches, including logistic regression models.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17033960      PMCID: PMC1698572          DOI: 10.1086/508571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  35 in total

Review 1.  New strategies for identifying gene-gene interactions in hypertension.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Two-locus models of disease.

Authors:  R J Neuman; J P Rice
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; Peter Donnelly; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-03-27       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Genetic measurement of theory of epistatic effects.

Authors:  G P Wagner; M D Laubichler; H Bagheri-Chaichian
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  The XPB and XPD DNA helicases are components of the p53-mediated apoptosis pathway.

Authors:  X W Wang; W Vermeulen; J D Coursen; M Gibson; S E Lupold; K Forrester; G Xu; L Elmore; H Yeh; J H Hoeijmakers; C C Harris
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Negative epistasis between the malaria-protective effects of alpha+-thalassemia and the sickle cell trait.

Authors:  Thomas N Williams; Tabitha W Mwangi; Sammy Wambua; Timothy E A Peto; David J Weatherall; Sunetra Gupta; Mario Recker; Bridget S Penman; Sophie Uyoga; Alex Macharia; Jedidah K Mwacharo; Robert W Snow; Kevin Marsh
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-10-16       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Linkage and association analysis of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE)-gene polymorphisms with ACE concentration and blood pressure.

Authors:  X Zhu; N Bouzekri; L Southam; R S Cooper; A Adeyemo; C A McKenzie; A Luke; G Chen; R C Elston; R Ward
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Multilocus analysis of hypertension: a hierarchical approach.

Authors:  Scott M Williams; Marylyn D Ritchie; John A Phillips; Elliot Dawson; Melissa Prince; Elvira Dzhura; Alecia Willis; Amma Semenya; Marshall Summar; Bill C White; Jonathan H Addy; John Kpodonu; Lee-Jun Wong; Robin A Felder; Pedro A Jose; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  BRCA1-BARD1 complexes are required for p53Ser-15 phosphorylation and a G1/S arrest following ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Megan Fabbro; Kienan Savage; Karen Hobson; Andrew J Deans; Simon N Powell; Grant A McArthur; Kum Kum Khanna
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Venüs Ummiye Onay; Laurent Briollais; Julia A Knight; Ellen Shi; Yuanyuan Wang; Sean Wells; Hong Li; Isaac Rajendram; Irene L Andrulis; Hilmi Ozcelik
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  63 in total

1.  Pathway-based genome-wide association analysis of coronary heart disease identifies biologically important gene sets.

Authors:  Lisa de las Fuentes; Wei Yang; Victor G Dávila-Román; C Charles Gu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  General epistatic models of the risk of complex diseases.

Authors:  Yun S Song; Fulton Wang; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  EPIBLASTER-fast exhaustive two-locus epistasis detection strategy using graphical processing units.

Authors:  Tony Kam-Thong; Darina Czamara; Koji Tsuda; Karsten Borgwardt; Cathryn M Lewis; Angelika Erhardt-Lehmann; Bernhard Hemmer; Peter Rieckmann; Markus Daake; Frank Weber; Christiane Wolf; Andreas Ziegler; Benno Pütz; Florian Holsboer; Bernhard Schölkopf; Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  The meaning of interaction.

Authors:  Xuefeng Wang; Robert C Elston; Xiaofeng Zhu
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Assessment of LD matrix measures for the analysis of biological pathway association.

Authors:  David R Crosslin; Xuejun Qin; Elizabeth R Hauser
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-02

6.  Structures and Assumptions: Strategies to Harness Gene × Gene and Gene × Environment Interactions in GWAS.

Authors:  Charles Kooperberg; Michael Leblanc; James Y Dai; Indika Rajapakse
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.901

7.  Improving power in contrasting linkage-disequilibrium patterns between cases and controls.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Xiaofeng Zhu; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A forest-based approach to identifying gene and gene gene interactions.

Authors:  Xiang Chen; Ching-Ti Liu; Meizhuo Zhang; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Association between urokinase haplotypes and outcome from infection-associated acute lung injury.

Authors:  John Arcaroli; Jeff Sankoff; Nianjun Liu; David B Allison; James Maloney; Edward Abraham
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Testing gene-gene interactions in genome wide association studies.

Authors:  Jie Kate Hu; Xianlong Wang; Pei Wang
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.