Literature DB >> 21146769

Awareness and utilization of BRCA1/2 testing among U.S. primary care physicians.

Cecelia A Bellcross1, Katherine Kolor, Katrina A B Goddard, Ralph J Coates, Michele Reyes, Muin J Khoury.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Testing for mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) has been commercially available since 1996.
PURPOSE: This study sought to determine, among U.S. primary care physicians, the level of awareness and utilization of BRCA testing and the 2005 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations.
METHODS: In 2009, data were analyzed on 1500 physician respondents to the 2007 DocStyles national survey (515 family practitioners, 485 internists, 250 pediatricians, and 250 obstetricians/gynecologists).
RESULTS: Overall, 87% of physicians were aware of BRCA testing, and 25% reported having ordered testing for at least one patient in the past year. Ordering tests was most prevalent among obstetricians/gynecologists in practice for more than 10 years, with more affluent patients. Physicians were asked to select indications for BRCA testing from seven different clinical scenarios representing increased (4) or low-risk (3) situations consistent with the USPSTF guidelines. Among ordering physicians (pediatricians excluded), 45% chose at least one low-risk scenario as an indication for BRCA testing. Only 19% correctly selected all of the increased-risk and none of the low-risk scenarios.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial majority of primary care physicians are aware of BRCA testing and many report having ordered at least one test within the past year. A minority, however, appear to consistently recognize the family history patterns identified by the USPSTF as appropriate indications for BRCA evaluation. These results suggest the need to improve providers' knowledge about existing recommendations-particularly in this era of increased BRCA direct-to-consumer marketing.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21146769     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  74 in total

1.  Young Women's Perceptions Regarding Communication with Healthcare Providers About Breast Cancer, Risk, and Prevention.

Authors:  Natasha Buchanan Lunsford; Karena F Sapsis; Betsy Smither; Jennifer Reynolds; Ben Wilburn; Temeika Fairley
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Barriers to and motivations for physician referral of patients to cancer genetics clinics.

Authors:  Carrie F Prochniak; Lisa J Martin; Erin M Miller; Sara C Knapke
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  An Applied Framework in Support of Shared Decision Making about BRCA Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Thomas B Silverman; Gilad J Kuperman; Alejandro Vanegas; Margaret Sin; Jill Dimond; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

4.  Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Anne Weidner; Courtney Lewis; Devon Bonner; Jongphil Kim; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Public health action in genomics is now needed beyond newborn screening.

Authors:  M S Bowen; K Kolor; W D Dotson; R M Ned; M J Khoury
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  A family history questionnaire improves detection of women at risk for hereditary gynecologic cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Margot M Koeneman; Arnold-Jan Kruse; Simone J S Sep; Cynthia S Gubbels; Brigitte F M Slangen; Toon van Gorp; Alberto Lopes; Encarna Gomez-Garcia; Roy F P M Kruitwagen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Physician Risk Assessment Knowledge Regarding BRCA Genetics Testing.

Authors:  Jason Cohn; William Blazey; David Tegay; Brian Harper; Sharon Koehler; Brookshield Laurent; Vivian Chan; Min-Kyung Jung; Bhuma Krishnamachari
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  "Drivers" of translational cancer epidemiology in the 21st century: needs and opportunities.

Authors:  Tram Kim Lam; Margaret Spitz; Sheri D Schully; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.

Authors:  Elvira D'Andrea; Tyra Lagerberg; Corrado De Vito; Erica Pitini; Carolina Marzuillo; Azzurra Massimi; Maria Rosaria Vacchio; Paola Grammatico; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Juan L Rodriguez; Nikki A Hawkins; Ashwini Soman; Mary C White; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Lisa A DeRoo; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.