| Literature DB >> 21143773 |
Leo M Heunks1, Johannes G van der Hoeven.
Abstract
About 20% to 30% of patients are difficult to wean from invasive mechanical ventilation. The pathophysiology of difficult weaning is complex. Accordingly, determining the reason for difficult weaning and subsequently developing a treatment strategy require a dedicated clinician with in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiology of weaning failure. This review presents a structural framework ('ABCDE') for the assessment and treatment of difficult-to-wean patients. Earlier recognition of the underlying causes may expedite weaning from mechanical ventilation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21143773 PMCID: PMC3220047 DOI: 10.1186/cc9296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
Figure 1Framework for the evaluation of difficult-to-wean patients. For each patient, diagnostics as described in the white box should be performed to assess the reasons(s) for difficult weaning. Endocrine dysfunction is probably relatively rare and therefore is not included in the first line of evaluation. Possible treatment/interventions are mentioned but, of course, need to be individualized. If the first-line evaluation does not improve weaning, proceed to the next level (within the affected column). For instance, if airway resistance is elevated but is not affected by albuterol and optimizing ventilator settings, diagnostic bronchoscopy should be performed to visualize the central airways. Risks and benefits should be weighed in each patient. ACTH, adrenocorticotrophic hormone; BNP, brain natriuretcic peptide; CAM-ICU, confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit; DO2, oxygen delivery; ECG, electrocardiogram; EIC, end inspiratory cycling; EMG, electromyography; iv, intravenous; P0.1, airway occlusion pressure at 100 ms; PEEPi, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure; Pi, inspiratory pressure; PSV, pressure support ventilation; SBT, spontaneous-breathing trial; SvO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation.
Factors affecting respiratory mechanics
| Increased airway resistance | Reduced compliance |
|---|---|
| Tube (small diameter, sputum retention) | Chest wall |
| Central airways | Edema |
| Tracheostomy malposition | Elevated abdominal pressure |
| Sputum plug | Pleural fluid and ascites |
| Corpus alienum (after trauma) | Obesity |
| Tracheomalacia or tracheal stenosis | Lung |
| Small airways | Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure |
| Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Alveolar filling (edema, pus, and collapse) |
| Acute respiratory distress syndrome | Pneumonia |
| Interstitial lung disease and fibrosis |
Figure 2Tracings obtained from ventilator while operating in the volume-controlled mode. Flow, pressure, and volume in time are presented from top to bottom. The dashed circle in the upper panel shows the truncated expiratory flow tracing, indicating intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Indeed, when expiration is interrupted (red solid arrow) after the next inspiration, airway pressure rises (middle panel), reflecting total PEEP (applied PEEP and intrinsic PEEP). To measure respiratory resistance, inspiratory hold is applied (red dotted arrow), resulting in rapid decay in airway pressure from peak to P1 and a subsequent slow decay to plateau pressure (P,plat).