OBJECTIVES: To determine whether high rates of ineffective triggering within the first 24 hrs of mechanical ventilation (MV) are associated with longer MV duration and shorter ventilator-free survival (VFS). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Sixty patients requiring invasive MV. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Patients had pressure-time and flow-time waveforms recorded for 10 mins within the first 24 hrs of MV initiation. Ineffective triggering index (ITI) was calculated by dividing the number of ineffectively triggered breaths by the total number of breaths (triggered and ineffectively triggered). A priori, patients were classified into ITI >or=10% or ITI <10%. Patient demographics, MV reason, codiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sedation levels, and ventilator parameters were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen of 60 patients had ITI >or=10%. The two groups had similar characteristics, including COPD frequency and ventilation parameters, except that patients with ITI >or=10% were more likely to have pressured triggered breaths (56% vs. 16%, p = .003) and had a higher intrinsic respiratory rate (22 breaths/min vs. 18, p = .03), but the set ventilator rate was the same in both groups (9 breaths/min vs. 9, p = .78). Multivariable analyses adjusting for pressure triggering also demonstrated that ITI >or=10% was an independent predictor of longer MV duration (10 days vs. 4, p = .0004) and shorter VFS (14 days vs. 21, p = .03). Patients with ITI >or=10% had a longer ICU length of stay (8 days vs. 4, p = .01) and hospital length of stay (21 days vs. 8, p = .03). Mortality was the same in the two groups, but patients with ITI >or=10% were less likely to be discharged home (44% vs. 73%, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Ineffective triggering is a common problem early in the course of MV and is associated with increased morbidity, including longer MV duration, shorter VFS, longer length of stay, and lower likelihood of home discharge.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether high rates of ineffective triggering within the first 24 hrs of mechanical ventilation (MV) are associated with longer MV duration and shorter ventilator-free survival (VFS). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Sixty patients requiring invasive MV. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Patients had pressure-time and flow-time waveforms recorded for 10 mins within the first 24 hrs of MV initiation. Ineffective triggering index (ITI) was calculated by dividing the number of ineffectively triggered breaths by the total number of breaths (triggered and ineffectively triggered). A priori, patients were classified into ITI >or=10% or ITI <10%. Patient demographics, MV reason, codiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sedation levels, and ventilator parameters were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen of 60 patients had ITI >or=10%. The two groups had similar characteristics, including COPD frequency and ventilation parameters, except that patients with ITI >or=10% were more likely to have pressured triggered breaths (56% vs. 16%, p = .003) and had a higher intrinsic respiratory rate (22 breaths/min vs. 18, p = .03), but the set ventilator rate was the same in both groups (9 breaths/min vs. 9, p = .78). Multivariable analyses adjusting for pressure triggering also demonstrated that ITI >or=10% was an independent predictor of longer MV duration (10 days vs. 4, p = .0004) and shorter VFS (14 days vs. 21, p = .03). Patients with ITI >or=10% had a longer ICU length of stay (8 days vs. 4, p = .01) and hospital length of stay (21 days vs. 8, p = .03). Mortality was the same in the two groups, but patients with ITI >or=10% were less likely to be discharged home (44% vs. 73%, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Ineffective triggering is a common problem early in the course of MV and is associated with increased morbidity, including longer MV duration, shorter VFS, longer length of stay, and lower likelihood of home discharge.
Authors: Lluis Blanch; Bernat Sales; Jaume Montanya; Umberto Lucangelo; Oscar Garcia-Esquirol; Ana Villagra; Encarna Chacon; Anna Estruga; Massimo Borelli; Ma Jose Burgueño; Joan C Oliva; Rafael Fernandez; Jesus Villar; Robert Kacmarek; Gastón Murias Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Lluís Blanch; Ana Villagra; Bernat Sales; Jaume Montanya; Umberto Lucangelo; Manel Luján; Oscar García-Esquirol; Encarna Chacón; Anna Estruga; Joan C Oliva; Alberto Hernández-Abadia; Guillermo M Albaiceta; Enrique Fernández-Mondejar; Rafael Fernández; Josefina Lopez-Aguilar; Jesús Villar; Gastón Murias; Robert M Kacmarek Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Karen G Mellott; Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro; Curtis N Sessler; Paul A Wetzel; Jon O Nilsestuen; Jessica M Ketchum Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Jonathan D Marhong; Laveena Munshi; Michael Detsky; Teagan Telesnicki; Eddy Fan Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 17.440