Andreas Perren1, Laurent Brochard. 1. Intensive Care Unit, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland, andreas.perren@eoc.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In anaesthetized patients scheduled for surgery, tracheal intubation is performed with the expectation of subsequent smooth extubation. In critically ill patients, separation from the ventilator is often gradual and the time chosen for extubation may be either delayed or premature. Thus, weaning is challenging, represents a large part of the ventilation period and concerns all mechanically ventilated patients surviving their stay. DEFINITIONS AND MANAGEMENT: Weaning may be stratified in three groups according to its difficulty and duration. In simple weaning the main issue is to detect the soonest time to start separation from the ventilator; this is frequently impeded by poor sedation management and excessive ventilator assistance. A two-step diagnostic approach is the most efficacious: screening for ascertained readiness to wean is confirmed by a diagnostic test simulating the post-extubation period, best performed by unassisted breathing (no PEEP). In case of test failure (difficult weaning), a structured and thorough diagnostic work-up regarding potentially reversible pathologies is required with a focus on cardiovascular dysfunction or fluid overload at the time of separation from the ventilator, respiratory or global muscle weakness and underlying infection. Prolonged weaning is exceptionally time- and resource-consuming, needs to properly appraise psychological problems, sleep and nutrition, and is probably best performed in specialized units. CONCLUSIONS: Adequately managing simple and difficult weaning requires one to think about ICU policies in terms of sedation, fluid balance and having a systematic screening strategy; it also needs an individualized approach to understand and treat the failing patients. Prolonged weaning requires a holistic approach.
BACKGROUND: In anaesthetized patients scheduled for surgery, tracheal intubation is performed with the expectation of subsequent smooth extubation. In critically illpatients, separation from the ventilator is often gradual and the time chosen for extubation may be either delayed or premature. Thus, weaning is challenging, represents a large part of the ventilation period and concerns all mechanically ventilated patients surviving their stay. DEFINITIONS AND MANAGEMENT: Weaning may be stratified in three groups according to its difficulty and duration. In simple weaning the main issue is to detect the soonest time to start separation from the ventilator; this is frequently impeded by poor sedation management and excessive ventilator assistance. A two-step diagnostic approach is the most efficacious: screening for ascertained readiness to wean is confirmed by a diagnostic test simulating the post-extubation period, best performed by unassisted breathing (no PEEP). In case of test failure (difficult weaning), a structured and thorough diagnostic work-up regarding potentially reversible pathologies is required with a focus on cardiovascular dysfunction or fluid overload at the time of separation from the ventilator, respiratory or global muscle weakness and underlying infection. Prolonged weaning is exceptionally time- and resource-consuming, needs to properly appraise psychological problems, sleep and nutrition, and is probably best performed in specialized units. CONCLUSIONS: Adequately managing simple and difficult weaning requires one to think about ICU policies in terms of sedation, fluid balance and having a systematic screening strategy; it also needs an individualized approach to understand and treat the failing patients. Prolonged weaning requires a holistic approach.
Authors: A Esteban; I Alía; F Gordo; R Fernández; J F Solsona; I Vallverdú; S Macías; J M Allegue; J Blanco; D Carriedo; M León; M A de la Cal; F Taboada; J Gonzalez de Velasco; E Palazón; F Carrizosa; R Tomás; J Suarez; R S Goldwasser Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: G-C Funk; S Anders; M-K Breyer; O C Burghuber; G Edelmann; W Heindl; G Hinterholzer; R Kohansal; R Schuster; A Schwarzmaier-D'Assie; A Valentin; S Hartl Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Dirk Schädler; Christoph Engel; Gunnar Elke; Sven Pulletz; Nils Haake; Inéz Frerichs; Günther Zick; Jens Scholz; Norbert Weiler Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nektaria Xirouchaki; Eumorfia Kondili; Katerina Vaporidi; George Xirouchakis; Maria Klimathianaki; George Gavriilidis; Evi Alexandopoulou; Maria Plataki; Christina Alexopoulou; Dimitris Georgopoulos Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-07-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Luca M Bigatello; Henry Thomas Stelfox; Lorenzo Berra; Ulrich Schmidt; Elise M Gettings Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Elie Azoulay; Giuseppe Citerio; Jan Bakker; Matteo Bassetti; Dominique Benoit; Maurizio Cecconi; J Randall Curtis; Glenn Hernandez; Margaret Herridge; Samir Jaber; Michael Joannidis; Laurent Papazian; Mark Peters; Pierre Singer; Martin Smith; Marcio Soares; Antoni Torres; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jean-François Timsit Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Boris Jung; Pierre Henri Moury; Martin Mahul; Audrey de Jong; Fabrice Galia; Albert Prades; Pierre Albaladejo; Gerald Chanques; Nicolas Molinari; Samir Jaber Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 17.440