Literature DB >> 21136118

The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database.

Kirstine Moll Harboe1, Linda Bardram.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones. The quality of the procedure frequently is included in quality improvement programs, but outcome values have not been described to define the standard of care for a general population. This study included 20,307 cholecystectomies from a national prospective database that combines administrative data with clinical data. This report states the quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark, establishes benchmarks, and identifies significant risk factors.
METHODS: The Danish Cholecystectomy Database was queried for data from 2006 to 2009. The outcome measures included conversion rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission, additional procedures, and 30-day mortality. Patient characteristics and operative findings were analyzed as risk factors using stepwise backward logistic regression.
RESULTS: The study included 20,307 patients (82% of all cholecystectomies). The conversion rate was 7.6%. Male sex, acute cholecystitis, and previous upper abdominal surgery were risk factors for conversion, with respective odds ratios of 1.50, 4.61, and 3.54. The mean LOS was 1.5 days, and 37.3% of the patients had same-day surgery. The readmission rate was 9.6%. Nearly 70% had a LOS of 1 day or less and no readmission; 17.3% had a LOS longer than 3 days and/or readmission; 5.6% had an additional procedure within 30 days; and 0.2% had a bile duct injury requiring reconstructive surgery. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.27%. Age older than 60 years, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score exceeding 1, and open procedure were significant risk factors for all the outcomes. Body mass index (BMI) was not a risk factor for any of the outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The quality of cholecystectomy is high in Denmark, with a low conversion rate and a high frequency of short admissions without readmission. Acute cholecystitis and open procedure are important risk factors for poorer outcomes.The results of this study analyzing a large, unbiased population can be used to benchmark outcomes of cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21136118     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1453-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement.

Authors:  Jan Mainz
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk?

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 3.  NIH Consensus conference. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.

Authors:  R Orlando; J C Russell; J Lynch; A Mattie
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

5.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S B Archer; D W Brown; C D Smith; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  M Johansson; A Thune; L Nelvin; M Stiernstam; B Westman; L Lundell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.

Authors:  Urs F Giger; Jean-Marie Michel; Isabelle Opitz; Devdas Th Inderbitzin; Thomas Kocher; Lukas Krähenbühl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies.

Authors:  Gennaro Nuzzo; Felice Giuliante; Ivo Giovannini; Francesco Ardito; Fabrizio D'Acapito; Maria Vellone; Marino Murazio; Giovanni Capelli
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-10

Review 9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery.

Authors:  A J Karayiannakis; A Polychronidis; S Perente; S Botaitis; C Simopoulos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Analysis of the SAGES outcomes initiative cholecystectomy registry.

Authors:  V Velanovich; J M Morton; M McDonald; R Orlando; G Maupin; L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  32 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Dan Azagury; Oliver Varban; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; David C Brooks; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients.

Authors:  Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen; Kirstine Moll Harboe; Linda Bardram
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients.

Authors:  René Fahrner; Matthias Turina; Valentin Neuhaus; Othmar Schöb
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Long-term outcome after early repair of iatrogenic bile duct injury. A national Danish multicentre study.

Authors:  Nicolaj M Stilling; Claus Fristrup; André Wettergren; Arnas Ugianskis; Jacob Nygaard; Kathrine Holte; Linda Bardram; Mogens Sall; Michael B Mortensen
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  SAGES expert Delphi consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; L Michael Brunt; Robert D Fanelli; Horacio J Asbun; Rajesh Aggarwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  M Eikermann; R Siegel; I Broeders; C Dziri; A Fingerhut; C Gutt; T Jaschinski; A Nassar; A M Paganini; D Pieper; E Targarona; M Schrewe; A Shamiyeh; M Strik; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones.

Authors:  George Berci; John Hunter; Leon Morgenstern; Maurice Arregui; Michael Brunt; Brandon Carroll; Michael Edye; David Fermelia; George Ferzli; Frederick Greene; Joseph Petelin; Edward Phillips; Jeffrey Ponsky; Harry Sax; Steven Schwaitzberg; Nathaniel Soper; Lee Swanstrom; William Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The volume-outcome relationship in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; King-Teh Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Hao-Hsien Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Prevention of bile duct injury: the case for incorporating educational theories of expertise.

Authors:  Sophia K McKinley; L Michael Brunt; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Current status of laparoscopy for acute abdomen in Italy: a critical appraisal of 2012 clinical guidelines from two consecutive nationwide surveys with analysis of 271,323 cases over 5 years.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Mauro Podda; Nicola Cillara; Graziano Pernazza; Valentina Giaccaglia; Luigi Ciccoritti; Giovanna Ioia; Stefano Mandalà; Camillo La Barbera; Arianna Birindelli; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.