Literature DB >> 14660535

Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement.

Jan Mainz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper provides a brief review of definitions, characteristics, and categories of clinical indicators for quality improvement in health care. ANALYSIS: Clinical indicators assess particular health structures, processes, and outcomes. They can be rate- or mean-based, providing a quantitative basis for quality improvement, or sentinel, identifying incidents of care that trigger further investigation. They can assess aspects of the structure, process, or outcome of health care. Furthermore, indicators can be generic measures that are relevant for most patients or disease-specific, expressing the quality of care for patients with specific diagnoses.
CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring health care quality is impossible without the use of clinical indicators. They create the basis for quality improvement and prioritization in the health care system. To ensure that reliable and valid clinical indicators are used, they must be designed, defined, and implemented with scientific rigour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14660535     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  216 in total

1.  Genetics Health Professionals' Views on Quality of Genetic Counseling Service Provision for Presymptomatic Testing in Late-Onset Neurological Diseases in Portugal: Core Components, Specific Challenges and the Need for Assessment Tools.

Authors:  M Paneque; Á Mendes; L Guimarães; J Sequeiros; H Skirton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Translation of evidence-based clinical standards into a new prehospital resuscitation policy in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Corita R Grudzen; Lynne D Richardson; William J Koenig; Jerome R Hoffman; Karl A Lorenz; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Improving the quality of clinical pharmacy services: a process to identify and capture high-value "quality actions".

Authors:  Nicole Bruchet; Peter Loewen; Jane de Lemos
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2011-01

4.  Low back pain: the time to become invested in clinical practice guidelines is now.

Authors:  Rob A B Oostendorp; Peter A Huijbregts
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Variable impact of complications in general surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eelke Bosma; Eelco J Veen; Mariska A C de Jongh; Jan A Roukema
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Developing a benchmarking process in perfusion: a report of the Perfusion Downunder Collaboration.

Authors:  Robert A Baker; Richard F Newland; Carmel Fenton; Michael McDonald; Timothy W Willcox; Alan F Merry
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

Review 7.  Bayesian methods in reporting and managing Australian clinical indicators.

Authors:  Peter P Howley; Stephen J Hancock; Robert W Gibberd; Sheuwen Chuang; Frank A Tuyl
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  The Volume-Outcome Relationship Revisited: Practice Indeed Makes Perfect.

Authors:  Corinna Hentschker; Roman Mennicken
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Measuring improvement in populations: implementing and evaluating successful change in lung cancer care.

Authors:  Xinhua Yu; Lisa M Klesges; Mathew P Smeltzer; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

10.  Quality of care for cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: development of key interventions and outcome indicators using a two-round Delphi approach.

Authors:  Mira Dreesen; Veerle Foulon; Martin Hiele; Kris Vanhaecht; Lutgart De Pourcq; Loris Pironi; André Van Gossum; Jann Arends; Cristina Cuerda; Paul Thul; Frederico Bozzetti; Ludo Willems
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.