Jan Mainz1. 1. The National Indicator Project and University of Aarhus, Denmark. jmz@ag.aaa.dk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This paper provides a brief review of definitions, characteristics, and categories of clinical indicators for quality improvement in health care. ANALYSIS: Clinical indicators assess particular health structures, processes, and outcomes. They can be rate- or mean-based, providing a quantitative basis for quality improvement, or sentinel, identifying incidents of care that trigger further investigation. They can assess aspects of the structure, process, or outcome of health care. Furthermore, indicators can be generic measures that are relevant for most patients or disease-specific, expressing the quality of care for patients with specific diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring health care quality is impossible without the use of clinical indicators. They create the basis for quality improvement and prioritization in the health care system. To ensure that reliable and valid clinical indicators are used, they must be designed, defined, and implemented with scientific rigour.
OBJECTIVE: This paper provides a brief review of definitions, characteristics, and categories of clinical indicators for quality improvement in health care. ANALYSIS: Clinical indicators assess particular health structures, processes, and outcomes. They can be rate- or mean-based, providing a quantitative basis for quality improvement, or sentinel, identifying incidents of care that trigger further investigation. They can assess aspects of the structure, process, or outcome of health care. Furthermore, indicators can be generic measures that are relevant for most patients or disease-specific, expressing the quality of care for patients with specific diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring health care quality is impossible without the use of clinical indicators. They create the basis for quality improvement and prioritization in the health care system. To ensure that reliable and valid clinical indicators are used, they must be designed, defined, and implemented with scientific rigour.
Authors: Corita R Grudzen; Lynne D Richardson; William J Koenig; Jerome R Hoffman; Karl A Lorenz; Steven M Asch Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-10-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Robert A Baker; Richard F Newland; Carmel Fenton; Michael McDonald; Timothy W Willcox; Alan F Merry Journal: J Extra Corpor Technol Date: 2012-03
Authors: Peter P Howley; Stephen J Hancock; Robert W Gibberd; Sheuwen Chuang; Frank A Tuyl Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: Mira Dreesen; Veerle Foulon; Martin Hiele; Kris Vanhaecht; Lutgart De Pourcq; Loris Pironi; André Van Gossum; Jann Arends; Cristina Cuerda; Paul Thul; Frederico Bozzetti; Ludo Willems Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 3.603