Literature DB >> 21133967

The change in the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section.

William A Grobman1, Yinglei Lai, Mark B Landon, Catherine Y Spong, Dwight J Rouse, Michael W Varner, Steve N Caritis, Margaret Harper, Ronald J Wapner, Yoram Sorokin.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether, and to what degree, the change in the vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) rate is due to a change in the characteristics of the obstetric population, the undertaking of a trial of labour (TOL), or the tendency to abandon a TOL once it has been initiated. All women with one prior low transverse caesarean section (CS) and a vertex singleton gestation at term were identified in a registry of CS deliveries occurring at eight academic centres during a 4-year period (1999-2002). Women were classified by their predicted chance of VBAC and year-to-year differences were analysed. Of the 9643 women who met criteria for analysis, 5334 (55.3%) underwent a TOL. From 1999 to 2002, the VBAC rate underwent a steady decline: 51.8% to 45.1% to 37.4% to 29.8% (P < 0.001). Although there were some changes in the characteristics of the population that predispose to successful VBAC, as well as some reduction in the chance that a VBAC is successful once a TOL is undertaken, the most pervasive reason for this decline was that women became increasingly likely to forego a TOL, regardless of their likelihood of vaginal delivery. Based on these results, it appears that the change over time in the VBAC rate is multifactorial, although the greatest change has been a decrease in the frequency with which women undertake a TOL, and this change is observed in all categories of the chance of a successful TOL.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21133967      PMCID: PMC3066476          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01169.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  12 in total

1.  Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study.

Authors:  B L Flamm; L A Newman; S J Thomas; D Fallon; M M Yoshida
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman; Ellen Hertzmark
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Vaginal birth after cesarean in California: before and after a change in guidelines.

Authors:  John Zweifler; Alvaro Garza; Susan Hughes; Matthew A Stanich; Anne Hierholzer; Monica Lau
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology.

Authors:  Fay Menacker; Eugene Declercq; Marian F Macdorman
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.

Authors:  M J McMahon; E R Luther; W A Bowes; A F Olshan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  John Yeh; Jean Wactawski-Wende; James A Shelton; Jennifer Reschke
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?

Authors:  George A Macones; Alison G Cahill; David M Stamilio; Anthony Odibo; Jeffrey Peipert; Erika J Stevens
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  D A Miller; F G Diaz; R H Paul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Y Tony Yang; Michelle M Mello; S V Subramanian; David M Studdert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  17 in total

1.  Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Anjali J Kaimal; William A Grobman; Allison S Bryant; Laura Norrell; Yamilee Bermingham; Anna Altshuler; Mari-Paule Thiet; Juan Gonzalez; Peter Bacchetti; Michelle Moghadassi; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Lilly Y Liu; William A Grobman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Medical Malpractice Liability Exposure and OB/GYN Physician Delivery Decisions.

Authors:  Christine Piette Durrance; Scott Hankins
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Variation in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean by Maternal Race and Detailed Ethnicity.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Summer Sherburne Hawkins; Bruce B Cohen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-06

5.  Outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean birth by provider type in low-risk women.

Authors:  Matthew S Fore; Amanda A Allshouse; Nicole S Carlson; K Joseph Hurt
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammed Walid Zimmo; Katariina Laine; Sahar Hassan; Bettina Bottcher; Erik Fosse; Hadil Ali-Masri; Kaled Zimmo; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Marit Lieng; Åse Vikanes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Grecio Sandoval; Madeline Murguia Rice; Jennifer L Bailit; Suneet P Chauhan; Maged M Costantine; Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman; Torri D Metz; Samuel Parry; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; Hyagriv N Simhan; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Monica Longo; Mark B Landon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Hospital bans on trial of labor after cesarean and antepartum transfer of care.

Authors:  Melissa G Rosenstein; Laura Norrell; Anna Altshuler; William A Grobman; Anjali J Kaimal; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.081

9.  Private health care coverage and increased risk of obstetric intervention.

Authors:  Jennifer E Lutomski; Michael Murphy; Declan Devane; Sarah Meaney; Richard A Greene
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women.

Authors:  Akira Yokoi; Kaoru Ishikawa; Ken Miyazaki; Kana Yoshida; Madoka Furuhashi; Koji Tamakoshi
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.