Literature DB >> 17000247

Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?

George A Macones1, Alison G Cahill, David M Stamilio, Anthony Odibo, Jeffrey Peipert, Erika J Stevens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to use multivariable methods to develop clinical predictive models for the occurrence of uterine rupture by using both antepartum and early intrapartum factors. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a planned secondary analysis from a multicenter case-control study of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) delivery. Multivariable methods were used to develop 2 separate clinical predictive indices--one that used only prelabor factors and the other that used both prelabor and early labor factors. These indices were also assessed with the use of Receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: We identified 134 cases of uterine rupture and 665 noncases. No single individual factor is sufficiently sensitive or specific for clinical prediction of uterine rupture. Likewise, the 2 clinical predictive indices were neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for clinical use (receiver operating characteristic curve [area under the curve] 0.67 and 0.70, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Uterine rupture cannot be predicted with either individual or combinations of clinical factors. This has important clinical and medical-legal implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17000247     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  The change in the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Hyagriv N Simhan; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Causes of an Increased Rate of Caesarean Section.

Authors:  Nenad Miseljic; Ejub Basic; Sanja Miseljic
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2018-12

5.  Epidemiology of uterine rupture among pregnant women in China and development of a risk prediction model: analysis of data from a multicentre, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wenqiang Zhan; Jing Zhu; Xiaolin Hua; Jiangfeng Ye; Qian Chen; Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.