Literature DB >> 16735524

Vaginal birth after cesarean in California: before and after a change in guidelines.

John Zweifler1, Alvaro Garza, Susan Hughes, Matthew A Stanich, Anne Hierholzer, Monica Lau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In 1999 the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) adopted more-restrictive guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC). This study assesses trends in VBAC in California and compares neonatal and maternal mortality rates among women attempting VBAC delivery or undergoing repeat cesarean delivery before and after this guideline revision.
METHODS: The 1996 through 2002 California Birth Statistical Master Files were used to identify 386,232 California residents who previously gave birth by cesarean delivery and had a singleton birth planned in a California hospital.
RESULTS: Attempted VBAC deliveries decreased significantly from 24% before to 13.5% after guideline revision (P <.001). Neonatal mortality rates per 1,000 live births for attempted VBAC deliveries were not different from repeat cesarean delivery rates among neonates weighing > or =1,500 g in either the study periods 1996 to 1999 or 2000 to 2002. Neonatal mortality rates for attempted VBAC deliveries were higher for repeat cesarean deliveries among neonates weighing <1,500 g in the same periods (attempted VBAC: 1996-1999, 253.2; 95% Poisson confidence interval [CI], 197.7-308.6; 2000-2002, 336.8; CI, 254.3-419.4; repeat cesarean delivery: 1996-1999, 59.1; CI, 48.3-69.9; 2000-2002, 60.5, CI, 48.4-72.5). Maternal death rates per 100,000 live births for attempted VBAC deliveries were similar for both periods (1996-1999, 2.0; CI, 0.1-11.0; 2000-2002, 8.5; CI, 1.0-30.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal and maternal mortality rates did not improve despite increasing rates of repeat cesarean delivery during the years after the ACOG 1999 VBAC guideline revision. Women with infants weighing > or =1,500 g encountered similar neonatal and maternal mortality rates with VBAC or repeat cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16735524      PMCID: PMC1479438          DOI: 10.1370/afm.544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  20 in total

1.  ACOG Practice Bulletin #54: vaginal birth after previous cesarean.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Vaginal birth after Cesarean rates are declining rapidly in the rural state of Maine.

Authors:  M G Pinette; J Kahn; K L Gross; J R Wax; J Blackstone; A Cartin
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2004-07

3.  Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: experience in the non-university level II regional hospital setting.

Authors:  J G Holland; A R Dupre; P G Blake; R W Martin; J N Martin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Once a cesarean, always a controversy.

Authors:  B L Flamm
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Are we underestimating rates of vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth? The validity of delivery methods from birth certificates.

Authors:  D C Green; J M Moore; M M Adams; C J Berg; L S Wilcox; B J McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Avoiding labor problems during vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  J R Scott
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Jill P Pell; Richard Dobbie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Effect of corticosteroids for fetal maturation on perinatal outcomes.

Authors: 
Journal:  NIH Consens Statement       Date:  1994 Feb 28-Mar 2

9.  Births: final data for 2002.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Paul D Sutton; Stephanie J Ventura; Fay Menacker; Martha L Munson
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2003-12-17

10.  The experience with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a small rural community practice.

Authors:  B D Raynor
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  8 in total

1.  Duty hour restrictions, ambulatory experience, and surgical procedural volume in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  Sarah M Kane; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Jennifer Bailit; May Hsieh Blanchard
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-12

2.  Neonatal mortality risk for repeat cesarean compared to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States, 1998-2002 birth cohorts.

Authors:  Fay Menacker; Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-03

3.  The change in the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kim J Cox
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  An examination of cesarean and vaginal birth histories among Hispanic women entering prenatal care in two California counties with large immigrant populations.

Authors:  Enrique Gonzalez-Mendez; Enrique Gonzales-Mendez; Catherine Gonzalez-Maddux; Celeste Hall; Mary Maddux-Gonzalez; Margaret A Handley
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-04

6.  Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review.

Authors:  Aireen Wingert; Cydney Johnson; Robin Featherstone; Meghan Sebastianski; Lisa Hartling; R Douglas Wilson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Outcomes and risk factors for failed trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in women with one previous cesarean section: a Chinese population-based study.

Authors:  Xiaobo He; Qiaona Dai; Xiaoli Wu; Junjun Zhou; Jie Li
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  A survey of access to trial of labor in California hospitals in 2012.

Authors:  Mary K Barger; Jennifer Templeton Dunn; Sage Bearman; Megan DeLain; Elena Gates
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.