Literature DB >> 21130789

Encoding strategy accounts for individual differences in change detection measures of VSTM.

A C Linke1, A Vicente-Grabovetsky, D J Mitchell, R Cusack.   

Abstract

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) capacity is often assessed using change detection tasks, and individual differences in performance have been shown to predict cognitive aptitudes across a range of domains in children and adults. We recently showed that intelligence correlates with an attentional component necessary for change detection rather than with memory capacity per se (Cusack, Lehmann, Veldsman, & Mitchell, 2009). It remained unclear, however, whether different attentional strategies during change detection have most impact during the encoding or maintenance of information. Here we present recent findings from our laboratory supporting the hypothesis that attentional selection during encoding dominates individual differences in change detection measures of visual short-term memory. In a first study, we unpredictably varied whether short-term memory was probed using change detection or whole report, encouraging participants to adopt the same encoding strategy throughout the tasks. Change detection performance of lower-IQ individuals improved. In a second study, we found that deficits in top-down attentional selectivity can be alleviated in participants with low change detection performance by providing helpful grouping information during encoding. Finally, a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data from 112 participants performing a variety of VSTM tasks showed that performance correlates with activity in several parietal and frontal regions during the encoding but not the maintenance phase. Taken together, these results support the notion that encoding strategy and not short-term memory capacity itself largely determines individual differences in visual change detection performance.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21130789     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  20 in total

1.  Stimulus-specific suppression preserves information in auditory short-term memory.

Authors:  Annika C Linke; Alejandro Vicente-Grabovetsky; Rhodri Cusack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The reliability and internal consistency of one-shot and flicker change detection for measuring individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Hrag Pailian; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

3.  Slot-like capacity and resource-like coding in a neural model of multiple-item working memory.

Authors:  Dominic Standage; Martin Paré
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The cognitive neuroscience of visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2015-02

5.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  N-back versus Complex Span Working Memory Training.

Authors:  Kara J Blacker; Serban Negoita; Joshua B Ewen; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2017-10-16

7.  Dynamic updating of working memory resources for visual objects.

Authors:  Nikos Gorgoraptis; Raquel F G Catalao; Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Effects of strategy on visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Jesse J Bengson; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

10.  Visual working memory buffers information retrieved from visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.