Literature DB >> 21123310

Development of an imaging-planning program for screen/film and computed radiography mammography for breasts with short chest wall to nipple distance.

S L Dong1, J L Su, Y H Yeh, T C Chu, Y C Lin, K S Chuang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Imaging breasts with a short chest wall to nipple distance (CWND) using a traditional mammographic X-ray unit is a technical challenge for mammographers. The purpose of this study is the development of an imaging-planning program to assist in determination of imaging parameters of screen/film (SF) and computed radiography (CR) mammography for short CWND breasts.
METHODS: A traditional mammographic X-ray unit (Mammomat 3000, Siemens, Munich, Germany) was employed. The imaging-planning program was developed by combining the compressed breast thickness correction, the equivalent polymethylmethacrylate thickness assessment for breasts and the tube loading (mAs) measurement. Both phantom exposures and a total of 597 exposures were used for examining the imaging-planning program.
RESULTS: Results of the phantom study show that the tube loading rapidly decreased with the CWND when the automatic exposure control (AEC) detector was not fully covered by the phantom. For patient exposures with the AEC fully covered by breast tissue, the average fractional tube loadings, defined as the ratio of the predicted mAs using the imaging-planning program and mAs of the mammogram, were 1.10 and 1.07 for SF and CR mammograms, respectively. The predicted mAs values were comparable to the mAs values, as determined by the AEC.
CONCLUSION: By applying the imaging-planning program in clinical practice, the experiential dependence of the mammographer for determination of the imaging parameters for short CWND breasts is minimised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21123310      PMCID: PMC3473466          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/97507379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  6 in total

1.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.

Authors:  D R Dance; C L Skinner; K C Young; J R Beckett; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose.

Authors:  D R Dance
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Dosimetric implications of age related glandular changes in screening mammography.

Authors:  J R Beckett; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography.

Authors:  R L Kruger; B A Schueler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.

Authors:  R Klein; H Aichinger; J Dierker; J T Jansen; S Joite-Barfuss; M Säbel; R Schulz-Wendtland; J Zoetelief
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Composition of mammographic phantom materials.

Authors:  R A Geise; A Palchevsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.105

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.