Literature DB >> 10730972

Dosimetric implications of age related glandular changes in screening mammography.

J R Beckett1, C J Kotre.   

Abstract

The UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme is currently organized to routinely screen women between the ages of 50 and 64, with screening for older women available on request. The lower end of this age range closely matches the median age for the menopause (51 years), during which significant changes in the composition of the breast are known to occur. In order to quantify the dosimetric effect of these changes, radiographic factors and compressed breast thickness data for a cohort of 1258 women aged between 35 and 79 undergoing breast screening mammography have been used to derive estimates of breast glandularity and mean glandular dose (MGD), and examine their variation with age. The variation of mean radiographic exposure factors with age is also investigated. The presence of a significant number of age trial women within the cohort allowed an extended age range to be studied. Estimates of MGD including corrections for breast glandularity based on compressed breast thickness only, compressed breast thickness and age and for each individual woman are compared with the MGD based on the conventional assumption of a 50:50 adipose/glandular composition. It has been found that the use of the conventional 50:50 assumption leads to overestimates of MGD of up to 13% over the age range considered. By using compressed breast thickness to estimate breast glandularity, this error range can be reduced to 8%, whilst age and compressed breast thickness based glandularity estimates result in an error range of 1%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10730972     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  X-ray absorptiometry of the breast using mammographic exposure factors: application to units featuring automatic beam quality selection.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Development of an imaging-planning program for screen/film and computed radiography mammography for breasts with short chest wall to nipple distance.

Authors:  S L Dong; J L Su; Y H Yeh; T C Chu; Y C Lin; K S Chuang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Statistical analysis of mammographic breast composition measurements: towards a quantitative measure of relative breast cancer risk.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography.

Authors:  Simone van der Burg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Robert S Saunders
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

7.  A tissue-equivalent phantom series for mammography dosimetry.

Authors:  William P Argo; Kathleen Hintenlang; David E Hintenlang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women.

Authors:  Mika Yamamuro; Yoshiyuki Asai; Naomi Hashimoto; Nao Yasuda; Yoshiaki Ozaki; Kazunari Ishii; Yongbum Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.