Literature DB >> 11488578

A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography.

R L Kruger1, B A Schueler.   

Abstract

A survey was conducted to estimate the mean glandular dose (MGD) for women undergoing mammography and to report the distribution of doses, compressed breast thickness, glandular tissue content, and mammographic technique factors used. From 24,471 mammograms, of 6,006 women, clinical data were collected. The survey data included mammograms from seven modern units using a molybdenum (Mo) anode and either Mo or rhodium (Rh) filter. Exposure factors for each mammogram were recorded automatically onto a floppy disk on each unit. All mammography units were calibrated individually using breast tissue equivalent attenuation slabs of varying glandular content, so the breast glandular content could be estimated on the basis of exposure factors and compressed breast thickness. The MGD was estimated for each mammogram based on the normalized glandular dose and calculated entrance exposure in air. The survey found a median MGD of 2.6 mGy. The median breast glandular tissue content was 28% and the median compressed breast thickness was 5.1 cm. Also, patient attenuation data were converted to equivalent BR-12 and acrylic thickness to help determine appropriate phantom thicknesses required for mammography unit automatic exposure control performance assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11488578     DOI: 10.1118/1.1382606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Development of an imaging-planning program for screen/film and computed radiography mammography for breasts with short chest wall to nipple distance.

Authors:  S L Dong; J L Su; Y H Yeh; T C Chu; Y C Lin; K S Chuang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  An inter-hospital comparison of patient dose based on clinical indications.

Authors:  W Teeuwisse; J Geleijns; W Veldkamp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Radiological diagnosis of mammary carcinomas. I: pathology and x-ray mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; H-P Sinn
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  p53 Ser15 phosphorylation and histone modifications contribute to IR-induced miR-34a transcription in mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Dongping Li; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

7.  Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women.

Authors:  Ji Eun Baek; Bong Joo Kang; Sung Hun Kim; Hyun Sil Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Estimation of cancer risks during mammography procedure in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  A Sulieman; O Serhan; H I Al-Mohammed; M Z Mahmoud; M Alkhorayef; B Alonazi; E Manssor; A Yousef
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.219

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.