Literature DB >> 8596830

Composition of mammographic phantom materials.

R A Geise1, A Palchevsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the composition of a breast phantom that is most suitable for phototimer testing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kilovolt peak and milliampere second values were analyzed for phototimed exposures of phantoms containing 0%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 100% simulated glandular material at thicknesses of 2, 4, 6, and 8 cm. Data also were analyzed from 1,578 mammograms in 417 patients. The mean effective glandular content of phantoms that simulated patient breasts of varying thicknesses was determined.
RESULTS: Examination of mammographic techniques showed that the effective glandular content that simulated the average patient breast was 34%. Effective glandular content was 16% in breasts at least 7 cm thick when compressed; 26%, more than 5 to up to 7 cm thick; 42%, more than 3 to up to 5 cm thick, and 68% in breasts at most 3 cm thick.
CONCLUSION: A phantom composed of 30% glandular tissue and 70% adipose tissue allows closer simulation of the phototimer response of the mammographic x-ray unit for the average breast. The phantom currently used contains 16% more glandular tissue than the average breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8596830     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Development of an imaging-planning program for screen/film and computed radiography mammography for breasts with short chest wall to nipple distance.

Authors:  S L Dong; J L Su; Y H Yeh; T C Chu; Y C Lin; K S Chuang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Prospects for in vivo estimation of photon linear attenuation coefficients using postprocessing dual-energy CT imaging on a commercial scanner: comparison of analytic and polyenergetic statistical reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Joshua D Evans; Bruce R Whiting; Joseph A O'Sullivan; David G Politte; Paul H Klahr; Yaduo Yu; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Development of a physical 3D anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Ann-Katherine Carton; Predrag Bakic; Christer Ullberg; Helen Derand; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Alice Averbukh; Catherine Moran; Eric A Berns; Martin J Yaffe; Benjamin Herman; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Constantine Gatsonis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  A tissue-equivalent phantom series for mammography dosimetry.

Authors:  William P Argo; Kathleen Hintenlang; David E Hintenlang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Clinical optoacoustic imaging combined with ultrasound for coregistered functional and anatomical mapping of breast tumors.

Authors:  A A Oraevsky; B Clingman; J Zalev; A T Stavros; W T Yang; J R Parikh
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2018-08-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.