Literature DB >> 21120864

Accounting for conformational entropy in predicting binding free energies of protein-protein interactions.

Hetunandan Kamisetty1, Arvind Ramanathan, Chris Bailey-Kellogg, Christopher James Langmead.   

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are governed by the change in free energy upon binding, ΔG = ΔH - TΔS. These interactions are often marginally stable, so one must examine the balance between the change in enthalpy, ΔH, and the change in entropy, ΔS, when investigating known complexes, characterizing the effects of mutations, or designing optimized variants. To perform a large-scale study into the contribution of conformational entropy to binding free energy, we developed a technique called GOBLIN (Graphical mOdel for BiomoLecular INteractions) that performs physics-based free energy calculations for protein-protein complexes under both side-chain and backbone flexibility. Goblin uses a probabilistic graphical model that exploits conditional independencies in the Boltzmann distribution and employs variational inference techniques that approximate the free energy of binding in only a few minutes. We examined the role of conformational entropy on a benchmark set of more than 700 mutants in eight large, well-studied complexes. Our findings suggest that conformational entropy is important in protein-protein interactions--the root mean square error (RMSE) between calculated and experimentally measured ΔΔGs decreases by 12% when explicit entropic contributions were incorporated. GOBLIN models all atoms of the protein complex and detects changes to the binding entropy along the interface as well as positions distal to the binding interface. Our results also suggest that a variational approach to entropy calculations may be quantitatively more accurate than the knowledge-based approaches used by the well-known programs FOLDX and Rosetta--GOBLIN's RMSEs are 10 and 36% lower than these programs, respectively.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21120864     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  25 in total

1.  A Bayesian approach for determining protein side-chain rotamer conformations using unassigned NOE data.

Authors:  Jianyang Zeng; Kyle E Roberts; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Flex ddG: Rosetta Ensemble-Based Estimation of Changes in Protein-Protein Binding Affinity upon Mutation.

Authors:  Kyle A Barlow; Shane Ó Conchúir; Samuel Thompson; Pooja Suresh; James E Lucas; Markus Heinonen; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Systematic Testing of Belief-Propagation Estimates for Absolute Free Energies in Atomistic Peptides and Proteins.

Authors:  Rory M Donovan-Maiye; Christopher J Langmead; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Learning sequence determinants of protein:protein interaction specificity with sparse graphical models.

Authors:  Hetunandan Kamisetty; Bornika Ghosh; Christopher James Langmead; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Learning generative models of molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Narges Sharif Razavian; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Christopher J Langmead
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 6.  Generative models of conformational dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher James Langmead
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  A divide-and-conquer approach to determine the Pareto frontier for optimization of protein engineering experiments.

Authors:  Lu He; Alan M Friedman; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-12-16

8.  Dead-end elimination with perturbations (DEEPer): a provable protein design algorithm with continuous sidechain and backbone flexibility.

Authors:  Mark A Hallen; Daniel A Keedy; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-09-18

Review 9.  Algorithms for protein design.

Authors:  Pablo Gainza; Hunter M Nisonoff; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Effect of mutation at the interface of Trp-repressor dimeric protein: a steered molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  German Miño; Mauricio Baez; Gonzalo Gutierrez
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 1.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.