Literature DB >> 25973864

Learning sequence determinants of protein:protein interaction specificity with sparse graphical models.

Hetunandan Kamisetty1, Bornika Ghosh2, Christopher James Langmead3, Chris Bailey-Kellogg2.   

Abstract

In studying the strength and specificity of interaction between members of two protein families, key questions center on which pairs of possible partners actually interact, how well they interact, and why they interact while others do not. The advent of large-scale experimental studies of interactions between members of a target family and a diverse set of possible interaction partners offers the opportunity to address these questions. We develop here a method, DgSpi (data-driven graphical models of specificity in protein:protein interactions), for learning and using graphical models that explicitly represent the amino acid basis for interaction specificity (why) and extend earlier classification-oriented approaches (which) to predict the ΔG of binding (how well). We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in analyzing and predicting interactions between a set of 82 PDZ recognition modules against a panel of 217 possible peptide partners, based on data from MacBeath and colleagues. Our predicted ΔG values are highly predictive of the experimentally measured ones, reaching correlation coefficients of 0.69 in 10-fold cross-validation and 0.63 in leave-one-PDZ-out cross-validation. Furthermore, the model serves as a compact representation of amino acid constraints underlying the interactions, enabling protein-level ΔG predictions to be naturally understood in terms of residue-level constraints. Finally, the model DgSpi readily enables the design of new interacting partners, and we demonstrate that designed ligands are novel and diverse.

Keywords:  PDZ; graphical model; protein:protein interaction; specificity; ΔG prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25973864      PMCID: PMC4449715          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2014.0289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  38 in total

1.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations.

Authors:  Raphael Guerois; Jens Erik Nielsen; Luis Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A thermodynamic ligand binding study of the third PDZ domain (PDZ3) from the mammalian neuronal protein PSD-95.

Authors:  Dorina Saro; Tao Li; Chamila Rupasinghe; Azrael Paredes; Nicole Caspers; Mark R Spaller
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Conditional graphical models for protein structural motif recognition.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Jaime Carbonell; Vanathi Gopalakrishnan; Peter Weigele
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  Learning generative models for protein fold families.

Authors:  Sivaraman Balakrishnan; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Jaime G Carbonell; Su-In Lee; Christopher James Langmead
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-01-25

5.  Learning generative models of molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Narges Sharif Razavian; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Christopher J Langmead
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  S Fields; O Song
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-07-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  MultiRTA: a simple yet reliable method for predicting peptide binding affinities for multiple class II MHC allotypes.

Authors:  Andrew J Bordner; Hans D Mittelmann
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The immune epitope database and analysis resource: from vision to blueprint.

Authors:  Bjoern Peters; John Sidney; Phil Bourne; Huynh-Hoa Bui; Soeren Buus; Grace Doh; Ward Fleri; Mitch Kronenberg; Ralph Kubo; Ole Lund; David Nemazee; Julia V Ponomarenko; Muthu Sathiamurthy; Stephen Schoenberger; Scott Stewart; Pamela Surko; Scott Way; Steve Wilson; Alessandro Sette
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  A systematic assessment of MHC class II peptide binding predictions and evaluation of a consensus approach.

Authors:  Peng Wang; John Sidney; Courtney Dow; Bianca Mothé; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  NetMHCpan, a method for quantitative predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-A and -B locus protein of known sequence.

Authors:  Morten Nielsen; Claus Lundegaard; Thomas Blicher; Kasper Lamberth; Mikkel Harndahl; Sune Justesen; Gustav Røder; Bjoern Peters; Alessandro Sette; Ole Lund; Søren Buus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Systematic Testing of Belief-Propagation Estimates for Absolute Free Energies in Atomistic Peptides and Proteins.

Authors:  Rory M Donovan-Maiye; Christopher J Langmead; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 2.  Computational Tools and Strategies to Develop Peptide-Based Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  Maxence Delaunay; Tâp Ha-Duong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  DisruPPI: structure-based computational redesign algorithm for protein binding disruption.

Authors:  Yoonjoo Choi; Jacob M Furlon; Ryan B Amos; Karl E Griswold; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Integrating linear optimization with structural modeling to increase HIV neutralization breadth.

Authors:  Alexander M Sevy; Swetasudha Panda; James E Crowe; Jens Meiler; Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.