Literature DB >> 29185777

Systematic Testing of Belief-Propagation Estimates for Absolute Free Energies in Atomistic Peptides and Proteins.

Rory M Donovan-Maiye1, Christopher J Langmead2, Daniel M Zuckerman3.   

Abstract

Motivated by the extremely high computing costs associated with estimates of free energies for biological systems using molecular simulations, we further the exploration of existing "belief propagation" (BP) algorithms for fixed-backbone peptide and protein systems. The precalculation of pairwise interactions among discretized libraries of side-chain conformations, along with representation of protein side chains as nodes in a graphical model, enables direct application of the BP approach, which requires only ∼1 s of single-processor run time after the precalculation stage. We use a "loopy BP" algorithm, which can be seen as an approximate generalization of the transfer-matrix approach to highly connected (i.e., loopy) graphs, and it has previously been applied to protein calculations. We examine the application of loopy BP to several peptides as well as the binding site of the T4 lysozyme L99A mutant. The present study reports on (i) the comparison of the approximate BP results with estimates from unbiased estimators based on the Amber99SB force field; (ii) investigation of the effects of varying library size on BP predictions; and (iii) a theoretical discussion of the discretization effects that can arise in BP calculations. The data suggest that, despite their approximate nature, BP free-energy estimates are highly accurate-indeed, they never fall outside confidence intervals from unbiased estimators for the systems where independent results could be obtained. Furthermore, we find that libraries of sufficiently fine discretization (which diminish library-size sensitivity) can be obtained with standard computing resources in most cases. Altogether, the extremely low computing times and accurate results suggest the BP approach warrants further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29185777      PMCID: PMC5933972          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  37 in total

1.  Theory of a systematic computational error in free energy differences.

Authors:  Daniel M Zuckerman; Thomas B Woolf
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Practical Aspects of Free-Energy Calculations: A Review.

Authors:  Niels Hansen; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Joshua Williams; Yujie Wu; Wolfgang Damm; John Shelley; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 4.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2007

Review 5.  Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology.

Authors:  Ron O Dror; Robert M Dirks; J P Grossman; Huafeng Xu; David E Shaw
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 12.981

6.  Learning generative models for protein fold families.

Authors:  Sivaraman Balakrishnan; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Jaime G Carbonell; Su-In Lee; Christopher James Langmead
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-01-25

7.  Learning generative models of molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Narges Sharif Razavian; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Christopher J Langmead
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Implicit ligand theory: rigorous binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from molecular docking.

Authors:  David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Extending fragment-based free energy calculations with library Monte Carlo simulation: annealing in interaction space.

Authors:  Steven Lettieri; Artem B Mamonov; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery.

Authors:  David W Borhani; David E Shaw
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The binding and specificity of chemokine binding proteins, through the lens of experiment and computation.

Authors:  Lauren E Stark; Wenyan Guan; Michael E Colvin; Patricia J LiWang
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 7.892

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.