Literature DB >> 22821798

Dead-end elimination with perturbations (DEEPer): a provable protein design algorithm with continuous sidechain and backbone flexibility.

Mark A Hallen1, Daniel A Keedy, Bruce R Donald.   

Abstract

Computational protein and drug design generally require accurate modeling of protein conformations. This modeling typically starts with an experimentally determined protein structure and considers possible conformational changes due to mutations or new ligands. The DEE/A* algorithm provably finds the global minimum-energy conformation (GMEC) of a protein assuming that the backbone does not move and the sidechains take on conformations from a set of discrete, experimentally observed conformations called rotamers. DEE/A* can efficiently find the overall GMEC for exponentially many mutant sequences. Previous improvements to DEE/A* include modeling ensembles of sidechain conformations and either continuous sidechain or backbone flexibility. We present a new algorithm, DEEPer (Dead-End Elimination with Perturbations), that combines these advantages and can also handle much more extensive backbone flexibility and backbone ensembles. DEEPer provably finds the GMEC or, if desired by the user, all conformations and sequences within a specified energy window of the GMEC. It includes the new abilities to handle arbitrarily large backbone perturbations and to generate ensembles of backbone conformations. It also incorporates the shear, an experimentally observed local backbone motion never before used in design. Additionally, we derive a new method to accelerate DEE/A*-based calculations, indirect pruning, that is particularly useful for DEEPer. In 67 benchmark tests on 64 proteins, DEEPer consistently identified lower-energy conformations than previous methods did, indicating more accurate modeling. Additional tests demonstrated its ability to incorporate larger, experimentally observed backbone conformational changes and to model realistic conformational ensembles. These capabilities provide significant advantages for modeling protein mutations and protein-ligand interactions.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22821798      PMCID: PMC3491125          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  58 in total

1.  The penultimate rotamer library.

Authors:  S C Lovell; J M Word; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

2.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Protein design is NP-hard.

Authors:  Niles A Pierce; Erik Winfree
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2002-10

4.  Predicting resistance mutations using protein design algorithms.

Authors:  Kathleen M Frey; Ivelin Georgiev; Bruce R Donald; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Improved Pruning algorithms and Divide-and-Conquer strategies for Dead-End Elimination, with application to protein design.

Authors:  Ivelin Georgiev; Ryan H Lilien; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances.

Authors:  Ian W Davis; W Bryan Arendall; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 7.  Progress in computational protein design.

Authors:  Shaun M Lippow; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 9.740

8.  An improved pairwise decomposable finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann method for computational protein design.

Authors:  Christina L Vizcarra; Naigong Zhang; Shannon A Marshall; Ned S Wingreen; Chen Zeng; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 9.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

10.  Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins.

Authors:  J Janin; S Wodak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1978-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  35 in total

1.  BWM*: A Novel, Provable, Ensemble-based Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Sparse Approximations of Computational Protein Design.

Authors:  Jonathan D Jou; Swati Jain; Ivelin S Georgiev; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Improving computational efficiency and tractability of protein design using a piecemeal approach. A strategy for parallel and distributed protein design.

Authors:  Derek J Pitman; Christian D Schenkelberg; Yao-Ming Huang; Frank D Teets; Daniel DiTursi; Christopher Bystroff
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Toward high-resolution computational design of the structure and function of helical membrane proteins.

Authors:  Patrick Barth; Alessandro Senes
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Variability of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Flexibility Without Significant Change in the Initial Conformation of the Protein or Its Environment; a Computational Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghizadeh; Bahram Goliaei; Armin Madadkar-Sobhani
Journal:  Iran J Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Improved energy bound accuracy enhances the efficiency of continuous protein design.

Authors:  Kyle E Roberts; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-05-08

6.  cOSPREY: A Cloud-Based Distributed Algorithm for Large-Scale Computational Protein Design.

Authors:  Yuchao Pan; Yuxi Dong; Jingtian Zhou; Mark Hallen; Bruce R Donald; Jianyang Zeng; Wei Xu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  LUTE (Local Unpruned Tuple Expansion): Accurate Continuously Flexible Protein Design with General Energy Functions and Rigid Rotamer-Like Efficiency.

Authors:  Mark A Hallen; Jonathan D Jou; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  comets (Constrained Optimization of Multistate Energies by Tree Search): A Provable and Efficient Protein Design Algorithm to Optimize Binding Affinity and Specificity with Respect to Sequence.

Authors:  Mark A Hallen; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 1.479

9.  Computational Analysis of Energy Landscapes Reveals Dynamic Features That Contribute to Binding of Inhibitors to CFTR-Associated Ligand.

Authors:  Graham T Holt; Jonathan D Jou; Nicholas P Gill; Anna U Lowegard; Jeffrey W Martin; Dean R Madden; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  OSPREY: protein design with ensembles, flexibility, and provable algorithms.

Authors:  Pablo Gainza; Kyle E Roberts; Ivelin Georgiev; Ryan H Lilien; Daniel A Keedy; Cheng-Yu Chen; Faisal Reza; Amy C Anderson; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.