| Literature DB >> 21119634 |
Chenghang Zong1, Lok-hang So, Leonardo A Sepúlveda, Samuel O Skinner, Ido Golding.
Abstract
The ability of living cells to maintain an inheritable memory of their gene-expression state is key to cellular differentiation. Bacterial lysogeny serves as a simple paradigm for long-term cellular memory. In this study, we address the following question: in the absence of external perturbation, how long will a cell stay in the lysogenic state before spontaneously switching away from that state? We show by direct measurement that lysogen stability exhibits a simple exponential dependence on the frequency of activity bursts from the fate-determining gene, cI. We quantify these gene-activity bursts using single-molecule-resolution mRNA measurements in individual cells, analyzed using a stochastic mathematical model of the gene-network kinetics. The quantitative relation between stability and gene activity is independent of the fine details of gene regulation, suggesting that a quantitative prediction of cell-state stability may also be possible in more complex systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21119634 PMCID: PMC3010116 DOI: 10.1038/msb.2010.96
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Syst Biol ISSN: 1744-4292 Impact factor: 11.429
Figure 1Maintenance of lysogeny in bacteriophage lambda. (A) The genetic circuit maintaining the lysogenic state. Cell fate is determined by a competition between two genes: the lambda repressor (cI), transcribed from the PRM promoter; and cro, produced from PR. The two gene products, CI and Cro, compete for binding to six operator sites (OR1–3, OL1–3) and mutually repress each other's transcription (Ptashne, 2004). (B) Stable states of the system. The CI-dominated lysogenic state will switch to a Cro-dominated state after a drastic decrease in the number of repressor (CI) proteins in the cell (induction). In a wild-type lysogen, Cro will activate a cascade of lytic genes leading to viral replication and cell death. In the reporter strain (NC416), the lytic pathway is blocked and thus a stable Cro-dominated state is maintained. (C) Modeling the lysogeny maintenance system. The diagram describes the features included in our stochastic simulation. A two-state transcription kinetics is assumed for both cI (PRMon and PRMoff states) and cro (PRon and PRoff states). After translation from the corresponding mRNA, CI and Cro dimers compete for binding to the OR operator sites. This process is a fast-equilibrium step. The probability of OR operator bound with CI, Cro and RNA-polymerase can be described by the grand-canonical partition function Ξ(CI2, Cro2), where s indicates the occupancy state of the operators (1–40) and i, j and k indicate the number (0, 1, 2 or 3) of the corresponding molecules bound at state s (Shea and Ackers, 1985; Darling et al, 2000). The factor μ(T) describes the reduced stability of the temperature-sensitive allele (cI857) at elevated temperatures. For more details of our stochastic simulation see Materials and methods section. (D) cI mRNA in lysogens, labeled using smFISH. Shown is an overlay of the phase-contrast and fluorescence channels. Individual cells were automatically recognized (white boundary) based on the phase-contrast image. Fluorescent foci (red) indicate the presence of cI mRNA molecules. The photon count from these foci was then used to estimate the number of mRNA molecules in each cell. The strain is wild-type lysogen MG1655(λwt). The scale bar is 2 μm. (E) cI mRNA number distribution in lysogenic cells. Images containing ∼500 cells were collected and analyzed to build the distribution of mRNA copy-number per cell. This experimental histogram was fitted to a negative binomial distribution (blue curve), parameters of which were used to calculate the transcriptional burst frequency r and burst size bTX (r=1.4±0.2, bTX=4.3±0.4, six independent experiments). The results of our stochastic simulation (red curve) are also shown for comparison. For experimental details see Materials and methods section.
Figure 2Tuning the state of the lysogeny system. (A) Two-color smFISH was used for counting cI (red) and cro (green) mRNA in the reporter strain NC416. Sample images of cells grown at different temperatures are shown in the top row. Images containing ∼500 cells at each temperature were processed to yield the mRNA number distributions in the population (bottom two rows). The observed distributions (red/green circles) were fitted with negative binomial distributions (red/green lines) and compared to results of the stochastic simulation (blue lines). For details of smFISH and the stochastic simulation see Materials and methods section. (B) mRNA numbers as a function of temperature. Diamonds represent experimental data; dashed lines represent simulation data. cI and cro mRNA in NC416 strain (cro+) are plotted against temperature. The measured cI mRNA level for wild-type lysogen at 37°C is also plotted. (C) Comparison of cI mRNA and protein levels. Protein levels at each temperature were quantified using immunofluorescence (see Materials and methods section). Each protein data point represents the mean of >100 cells. mRNA levels are from smFISH data. Both mRNA and protein levels were normalized by the value at 30°C. Error bars correspond to the s.e.m. values obtained from two independent experiments. The population-averaged mRNA and protein levels were found to be proportional to each other (correlation coefficient is 0.99).
Figure 3Stability of the lysogenic state. (A) Measured values of spontaneous switching-rate per cell generation (S) for temperature-sensitive (cI857) prophages in both RecA+ and RecA– hosts (red and blue triangles, respectively), and wild-type prophage (red and blue squares, respectively). For experimental details see Materials and methods section. (B) The relation between lysogen stability and PRM activity. Plotted is the measured switching rate (S) as a function of the number of activity events from PRM in one protein lifetime (R), for the wild-type lysogen (red circle), cI857 at different temperatures (blue triangles), and mutants in both the cI gene (white triangles) and the PRM promoter (white squares). The simulation data includes a 20% error estimate on the effective CI activity (shaded blue area; see Materials and methods section). The points fall close to the theoretical prediction given by S=exp(−R) (solid black line), as compared to the prediction of two alternative hypotheses: non-bursty (Poissonian) gene activity (dashed black line); or protein production from an efficient ribosome-binding site yielding bCI=bLacZ (dot-dashed black line). Source data is available for this figure at www.nature.com/msb.
PRM-cI mutants used for analyzing lysogen stability
| Name | Genotype | PRM/CI phenotype | Reference | Source | Burst size, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | |||||||
| b | |||||||
| cNL, non-lysogenizable. | |||||||
| dFor the temperature-sensitive allele | |||||||
| λIG831 | Wild type | Wild type | Lab stocks | 4.3±0.4 | 9.0 × 10−9±6.4 × 10−9 | 16±1 | |
| λIG2504 | Covalent dimerization | Lab stocks | 4.3±0.5 | 5.8 × 10−9±5.9 × 10−9 | 19±3 | ||
| λIG1006 | 2 × TAG (amber) at AA102GAGTAC → TAGTAG | N-terminus only | Lab stocks | NLc | NL | NL | |
| λIG04061 | Tight operator binding | Lab stocks | 0.3±0.3 | 2.6 × 10−3±1.4 × 10−3 | 3.3±3.3 | ||
| λIG15052 | Misfolding | Lab stocks | NL | NL | NL | ||
| λIG04062 | Weak operator binding | Lab stocks | NL | NL | NL | ||
| λIG15051 | Weak operator binding | Lab stocks | NL | NL | NL | ||
| λIG28061 | Misfolding | Lab stocks | 3.6±0.5 | 1.4 × 10−8±1.1 × 10−8 | 12±4 | ||
| λIG28062 | Misfolding | Lab stocks | 4.0±0.6 | 7.5 × 10−8±3.4 × 10−8 | 16±2 | ||
| λJL8525 | No positive autoregulation; reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 4.0±0.5 | 3.7 × 10−4±7.5 × 10−5 | 9±1 | ||
| λNP2 | No positive autoregulation; reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 4.5±0.6 | 2.0 × 10−8±6.4 × 10−9 | 18±4 | ||
| λNP3 | No positive autoregulation; reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 0.9±0.4 | 1.0 × 10−8±2.2 × 10−9 | 14±1 | ||
| λNP4 | No positive autoregulation; reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 1.4±0.5 | 1.7 × 10−8±2.3 × 10−9 | 16±1 | ||
| λNP5 | cI D38NPRM-35 TAGA → CTAAPRM-10 GATT → GAAT | No positive autoregulation, reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 2.1±0.5 | 3.0 × 10−8±1.4 × 10−8 | 15±4 | |
| λNP6 | No positive autoregulation; reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 1.8±0.3 | 1.5 × 10−8±2.6 × 10−9 | 15±2 | ||
| λNP7 | No positive autoregulation, reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 0.5±0.1 | 2.3 × 10−8±2.8 × 10−9 | 25±7 | ||
| λNP8 | No positive autoregulation; reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 2.8±0.6 | 2.8 × 10−8±1.0 × 10−8 | 14±3 | ||
| λNP10 | No positive autoregulation; reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 1.1±0.4 | 1.5 × 10−8±4.7 × 10−9 | 16±3 | ||
| λNP11 | No positive autoregulation; reduced PRM activity | J. Little | 1.4±0.7 | 3.1 × 10−8±2.0 × 10−9 | 21±3 | ||
| λIG2903 d | Temperature-sensitive | Lab stocks | |||||
| 30°C | 4.7±0.6 | 5.8 × 10−9±1.5 × 10−9 | 17±3 | ||||
| 32°C | 4.8±0.7 | 1.1 × 10−7±7.3 × 10−8 | 16±2 | ||||
| 34°C | 4.1±0.7 | 2.1 × 10−6±1.6 × 10−6 | 10±2 | ||||
| 36°C | 6.5±0.3 | 1.7 × 10−2±8.0 × 10−3 | 4±1 | ||||