| Literature DB >> 21118487 |
František Zedek1, Jakub Smerda, Petr Smarda, Petr Bureš.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transposable elements (TEs) are considered to be an important source of genome size variation and genetic and phenotypic plasticity in eukaryotes. Most of our knowledge about TEs comes from large genomic projects and studies focused on model organisms. However, TE dynamics among related taxa from natural populations and the role of TEs at the species or supra-species level, where genome size and karyotype evolution are modulated in concert with polyploidy and chromosomal rearrangements, remain poorly understood. We focused on the holokinetic genus Eleocharis (Cyperaceae), which displays large variation in genome size and the occurrence of polyploidy and agmatoploidy/symploidy. We analyzed and quantified the long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons Ty1-copia and Ty3-gypsy in relation to changes in both genome size and karyotype in Eleocharis. We also examined how this relationship is reflected in the phylogeny of Eleocharis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21118487 PMCID: PMC3095338 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Patterns of LTR retrotransposons in the phylogeny of . An unrooted neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of analyzed Eleocharis species based on concatenated alignments of the ppc gene and ITS sequences is shown. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap values. Subgenera of Eleocharis sensu González-Elizondo and Peterson [67]: E = Eleocharis subgenus Eleocharis, S = Eleocharis subgenus Scirpirdium, Z = Eleocharis subgenus Zinserlingia, L = Eleocharis subgenus Limnochloa. Subseries of Eleocharis: E = Eleocharis subgenus Eleocharis subseries Eleocharis. Densities (number of copies per pg of genomic DNA) of the reverse transcriptases of LTR retrotransposons estimated by both dot blot and real-time PCR are indicated by circles. Genome size, C-value and chromosome number (2n) are indicated by squares.
List of analyzed Eleocharis species and measured values
| 2C [pg] | 2n1) | 2C/2n [Mbp] | LTR retrotransposon densities (real-time PCR) | LTR retrotransposon densities (dot blot) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ty1- | Ty3- | Helos1 | Ty1- | Ty3- | Helos1 | ||||
| 2.472) | 20 | 121 | 1507 | 158 | 4 | 36671 | 1859 | 686 | |
| 4.84 | 16 | 296 | 4290 | 101 | 622 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| 2.58 | 20 | 126 | 1971 | 159 | 133 | 29843 | 2064 | 801 | |
| 0.84 | n.a. | n.a. | 1236 | 193 | 10 | 9875 | 918 | 300 | |
| 5.48 | 18 | 298 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| n.a. | 40/52 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| 9.80 | 38 | 253 | 2217 | 119 | 181 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| 4.60 | 16 | 282 | 3928 | 89 | 677 | 85510 | 1279 | 7186 | |
| 1.40 | 10 | 137 | 1007 | 174 | 19 | 35417 | 1517 | 816 | |
| 4.20 | 16 | 257 | 3464 | 113 | 435 | 79966 | 1445 | 8132 | |
| 1.12 | 136 | 8 | 1112 | 241 | 2 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| 18.00 | 74 | 238 | 2217 | 107 | 199 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| 10.20 | 46 | 217 | 3899 | 149 | 320 | 81196 | 2845 | 5634 | |
| 8.74 | 36 | 238 | 2507 | 111 | 243 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| 11.00 | 39 | 276 | 3319 | 131 | 386 | 70679 | 900 | 6735 | |
| 5.50 | 18 | 299 | 2739 | 183 | 291 | 92801 | 1792 | 6676 | |
| Significance of phylogenetic signal | - | * | ** | * | * | ** | ** | - | ** |
1) Chromosome numbers were taken from previous studies ([68]: E. palustris, E. waltersii; [49]: E. sterneri because of sample identity; [69]: E. quinqueflora because of population identity; [35]: E. interstincta). For the remaining samples, chromosome numbers were counted by O. Rotreklová and P. Bureš (unpublished data).
2) An average of seven samples, each representing a different population (see Results and Discussion).
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01
Correlation between retrotransposon density and average chromosome size
| retrotransposon density (real-time PCR) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ty1- | Ty3- | Helos1 | ||||
| Spearman correlation1 | n | R | n | R | n | R |
| 13 | 0.770** | 13 | -0.505 | 13 | 0.835** | |
| Independent contrasts2 | n | R | n | R | n | R |
| 11 | 0.510 | 11 | -0.461 | 11 | 0.571* | |
| Ty1- | Ty3- | Helos1 | ||||
| Spearman correlation1 | n | R | n | R | n | R |
| 8 | 0.833* | 8 | -0.548 | 8 | 0.786* | |
| Independent contrasts2 | n | R | n | R | n | R |
| 7 | 0.918** | 7 | -0.353 | 7 | 0.914** | |
1) "n" indicates the number of correlated values
2) "n" indicates the number of independent phylogenetic contrasts
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01
Figure 2Characteristics and phylogenetic position of Helos1. a - Helos1 sequences aligned on the amino acid level. The highly conserved Helos1-specific motif is highlighted. b - Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of Ty1-copia. Branches leading to Helos1 sequences are depicted in black. A bootstrap value supporting the Helos1 clade is shown above the branch. The scale bar indicates Tamura 3-parameter distance.