Literature DB >> 21117756

The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.

S Theo Goverts1, Tammo Houtgast.   

Abstract

Reduced binaural performance of hearing-impaired listeners may not only be caused by raised hearing thresholds (reduced audibility), but also by supra-threshold coding deficits in signal cues. This question was investigated in the present study using binaural intelligibility level difference (BILD) comparisons: the improvement of speech-reception threshold scores for N(0)S(π) relative to N(0)S(0) presentation conditions. Investigated was what types of supra-threshold deficits play a role in reducing BILDs in hearing-impaired subjects. BILDs were investigated for 25 mild to moderate sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners, under conditions where optimal audibility was assured. All stimuli were bandpass filtered (250-4000 Hz). A distortion-sensitivity approach was used to investigate the sensitivity of subjects BILDs to external stimulus perturbations in the phase, frequency, time, and intensity domains. The underlying assumption of this approach was that an auditory coding deficit occurring in a signal cue in a particular domain will result in a low sensitivity to external perturbations applied in that domain. Compared to reference data for listeners with normal BILDs, distortion-sensitivity data for a subgroup of eight listeners with reduced BILDs suggests that these reductions in BILD were caused by coding deficits in the phase and time domains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21117756     DOI: 10.1121/1.3372716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Informational masking and spatial hearing in listeners with and without unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech recognition for school-age children and adults tested in multi-tone vs multi-noise-band maskers.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The Correlation Analysis Between the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) and the Psychophysical Measurement of Spatial Hearing.

Authors:  Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi; Maryam Delphi; Vafa Delphi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-06-06

5.  Binaural Recordings in Natural Acoustic Environments: Estimates of Speech-Likeness and Interaural Parameters.

Authors:  S Theo Goverts; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Feasibility of remote assessment of the binaural intelligibility level difference in school-age children.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Claire Dorey; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-01

7.  The Clear-Speech Benefit for School-Age Children: Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Stefan Zirn; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Roland Laszig; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.