Literature DB >> 21115873

Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Matthew R Cooperberg1, Janet E Cowan, Joan F Hilton, Adam C Reese, Harras B Zaid, Sima P Porten, Katsuto Shinohara, Maxwell V Meng, Kirsten L Greene, Peter R Carroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Active surveillance (AS) is an option for the initial management of early-stage prostate cancer. Current risk stratification schema identify patients with low-risk disease who are presumed to be most suitable for AS. However, some men with higher risk disease also elect AS; outcomes for such men have not been widely reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men managed with AS at University of California, San Francisco, were classified as low- or intermediate-risk based on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason grade, extent of biopsy involvement, and T stage. Clinical and demographic characteristics, and progression in terms of Gleason score, PSA kinetics, and active treatment were compared between men with low- and intermediate-risk tumors.
RESULTS: Compared to men with low-risk tumors, those with intermediate-risk tumors were older (mean, 64.9 v 62.3 years) with higher mean PSA values (10.9 v 5.1 ng/mL), and more tumor involvement (mean, 20.4% v 15.3% positive biopsy cores; all P < .01). Within 4 years of the first positive biopsy, the clinical risk group did not differ in terms of the proportions experiencing progression-free survival, (low [54%] v intermediate [61%]; log-rank P = .22) or the proportions who underwent active treatment (low [30%] v intermediate [35%]; log-rank P = .88). Among men undergoing surgery, none were node positive and none had biochemical recurrence within 3 years.
CONCLUSION: Selected men with intermediate-risk features be appropriate candidates for AS, and are not necessarily more likely to progress. AS for these men may provide an opportunity to further reduce overtreatment of disease that is unlikely to progress to advanced cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21115873      PMCID: PMC3058278          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.4252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

1.  Prostate specific antigen velocity as a measure of the natural history of prostate cancer: defining a 'rapid riser' subset.

Authors:  R K Nam; L H Klotz; M A Jewett; C Danjoux; J Trachtenberg
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1998-01

2.  Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ignacio F San Francisco; William C DeWolf; Seymour Rosen; Melissa Upton; Aria F Olumi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention using PSA doubling time for good risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Differences in clinical characteristics and disease-free survival for Latino, African American, and non-Latino white men with localized prostate cancer: data from CaPSURE.

Authors:  David M Latini; Eric P Elkin; Matthew R Cooperberg; Natalia Sadetsky; Janeen Duchane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; David J Pasta; Eric P Elkin; Mark S Litwin; David M Latini; Janeen Du Chane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: preliminary results.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Patrick C Walsh; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  An analysis of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who deferred definitive therapy.

Authors:  Manish I Patel; Dino T DeConcini; Ernesto Lopez-Corona; Makato Ohori; Thomas Wheeler; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.

Authors:  Susan R Harlan; Matthew R Cooperberg; Eric P Elkin; Deborah P Lubeck; Maxwell V Meng; Shilpa S Mehta; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Eligibility for active surveillance and pathological outcomes for men undergoing radical prostatectomy in a large, community based cohort.

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Janet E Cowan; Peter R Carroll; Benjamin J Davies
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  87 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Codifying active surveillance.

Authors:  D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Surveillance biopsy and active treatment during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Hashine; Hiroyuki Iio; Yoshiteru Ueno; Shohei Tsukimori; Iku Ninomiya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Prostate cancer: reducing overtreatment: active surveillance in low-risk disease.

Authors:  Jared M Whitson; Sima P Porten; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Insignificant disease among men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Emily Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Evaluation of models predicting insignificant prostate cancer to select men for active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  L M Wong; D E Neal; A Finelli; S Davis; C Bonner; J Kapoor; J Trachtenberg; B Thomas; C M Hovens; A J Costello; N M Corcoran
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 7.  Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Use, Outcomes, Imaging, and Diagnostic Tools.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb; Jonathan I Epstein; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

Review 8.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Mortality after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Tatsuki Koyama; Kang-Hsien Fan; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; David F Penson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J A Margolis; Malu MacAiran; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.