Literature DB >> 15582244

Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention using PSA doubling time for good risk prostate cancer.

Laurence Klotz1.   

Abstract

Good risk prostate cancer, defined as patients with a Gleason score of 6 or less, PSA<10-15, and T1c-T2a, now constitutes 50% of newly diagnosed prostate cancer. For most of these patients, the disease is indolent and slow growing. There is substantial evidence that it does not pose a threat during the lifetime of most patients. The challenge is to identify those patients who are not likely to experience significant progression while offering radical therapy to those who are at risk. To date, molecular markers have failed to provide sufficiently reliable predictive information to influence decision making. The approach to favorable risk prostate cancer described in this article uses estimation of PSA doubling time (PSA DT) to stratify patients according to the risk of progression. Patients who select this approach are managed initially with active surveillance. those who have a PSA DT of 3 years or less (based on a minimum of 3 determinations over 6 months) are offered radical intervention. The remainder are closely monitored with serial PSA and periodic prostate re-biopsies (at 2, 5, and 10 years). In this series of 299 patients, the median doubling time was 7.0 years. 42% had a PSA DT>10 years, and 20% had a PSA DT>100 years. The majority of patients in this study remain on surveillance. The approach of active surveillance with selective delayed intervention based on PSA DT represents a practical compromise between radical therapy for all (which results in overtreatment for patients with indolent disease), and watchful waiting with palliative therapy only (which results in undertreatment for those with aggressive disease).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15582244     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: active surveillance may prove organisationally impossible.

Authors:  W P Tormey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Association of obesity and smoking with PSA and PSA velocity in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amit M Algotar; Steven P Stratton; James Ranger-Moore; M Suzanne Stratton; C H Hsu; Frederick R Ahmann; Raymond B Nagle; Patricia A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2011-05

3.  Temporal Stability and Prognostic Biomarker Potential of the Prostate Cancer Urine miRNA Transcriptome.

Authors:  Jouhyun Jeon; Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel; Honglei Xie; Cindy Q Yao; Fang Zhao; Sahar Jahangiri; Carmelle Cuizon; Seville Scarcello; Renu Jeyapala; John D Watson; Michael Fraser; Jessica Ray; Kristina Commisso; Andrew Loblaw; Neil E Fleshner; Robert G Bristow; Michelle Downes; Danny Vesprini; Stanley Liu; Bharati Bapat; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Janet E Cowan; Joan F Hilton; Adam C Reese; Harras B Zaid; Sima P Porten; Katsuto Shinohara; Maxwell V Meng; Kirsten L Greene; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Differences in characteristics of men with localised prostate cancer who demonstrate low, intermediate or high prostate-specific antigen velocity.

Authors:  A M Algotar; P A Thompson; J Ranger-Moore; M S Stratton; C H Hsu; F R Ahmann; R B Nagle; S P Stratton
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.048

6.  Outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study.

Authors:  Pär Stattin; Erik Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Lars Holmberg; Jan Adolfsson; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  The spectrum of prostate cancer care: from curative intent to palliation.

Authors:  Ased S M Ali; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  The '2-week wait' rule for referrals for suspected urological cancers--urgent need for refinement of criteria.

Authors:  Amr M Hawary; Hazel E Warburton; Richard J Brough; Gerald N Collins; Stephen C Brown; Patrick H O'Reilly; Adebanji Ab Adeyoju
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.