Literature DB >> 21115177

Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production.

Maureen Gillespie1, Neal J Pearlmutter.   

Abstract

Two subject-verb agreement error elicitation studies tested the hierarchical feature-passing account of agreement computation in production and three timing-based alternatives: linear distance to the head noun, semantic integration, and a combined effect of both (a scope of planning account). In Experiment 1, participants completed subject noun phrase (NP) stimuli consisting of a head NP followed by two prepositional phrase (PP) modifiers, where the first PP modified the first NP, and the second PP modified one of the two preceding NPs. Semantic integration between the head noun and the local noun within each PP was held constant across structures. The mismatch error pattern showed an effect of linear distance to the head noun and no influence of hierarchical distance. In Experiment 2, participants completed NP PP PP stimuli in which both PPs modified the head noun, and both the order of the two PPs and the local nouns' degree of semantic integration with the head noun were varied. The pattern of mismatch errors reflected a combination of semantic integration and linear distance to the head noun. These studies indicate that agreement processes are strongly constrained by grammatical-level scope of planning, with local nouns planned closer to the head having a greater chance of interfering with agreement computation.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21115177      PMCID: PMC3133793          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  31 in total

1.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production.

Authors:  M Smith; L Wheeldon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

2.  Broken agreement.

Authors:  K Bock; C A Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Planning in sentence production: evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope.

Authors:  Randi C Martin; Jason E Crowther; Meredith Knight; Franklin P Tamborello; Chin-Lung Yang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

4.  Subject-verb agreement in children and adults: serial or hierarchical processing?

Authors:  Isabelle Negro; Lucile Chanquoy; Michel Fayol; Maryse Louis-Sidney
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-05

5.  Planning scope in spoken sentence production: the role of grammatical units.

Authors:  Paul H Allum; Linda R Wheeldon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear?

Authors:  G Vigliocco; J Nicol
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

7.  Language production and serial order: a functional analysis and a model.

Authors:  G S Dell; L K Burger; W R Svec
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish.

Authors:  F Cuetos; D C Mitchell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-10

9.  Effects of clausal structure on subject-verb agreement errors.

Authors:  J L Nicol
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

10.  Little houses and casas pequeñas: message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Agnieszka E Konopka
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-10-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Cues, quantification, and agreement in language comprehension.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Nyssa Z Bulkes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  How hierarchical is language use?

Authors:  Stefan L Frank; Rens Bod; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Janet Nicol; Laurel Brehm
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Against structural constraints in subject-verb agreement production.

Authors:  Maureen Gillespie; Neal J Pearlmutter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Resolving Conflicts in Natural and Grammatical Gender Agreement: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Maya Dank; Avital Deutsch; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-08

6.  Contrasting Grammatical and Lexical Determiners.

Authors:  Violaine Michel Lange; Maria Messerschmidt; Kasper Boye
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

7.  When Singular and Plural are Both Grammatical: Semantic and Morphophonological Effects in Agreement.

Authors:  Jelena Mirković; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Planning and production of grammatical and lexical verbs in multi-word messages.

Authors:  Violaine Michel Lange; Maria Messerschmidt; Peter Harder; Hartwig Roman Siebner; Kasper Boye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Minimal Interference from Possessor Phrases in the Production of Subject-Verb Agreement.

Authors:  Janet L Nicol; Andrew Barss; Jason E Barker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.