Literature DB >> 29116479

Contrasting Grammatical and Lexical Determiners.

Violaine Michel Lange1, Maria Messerschmidt2, Kasper Boye2.   

Abstract

This paper investigates the difference between the production of grammatical determiners and lexical determiners in the production of adjective-noun phrases (NPs) in Danish. Models of sentence processing (Garrett in Psychology of learning and motivation, Academic press, New York, pp 133-177, 1975; Bock in J Mem Lang 26(2):119-137, 1987) suggest that the phonological encoding stage of grammatical items can only be specified once lexical items have been phonologically encoded. In their usage-based linguistic theory of the grammar-lexicon distinction, Boye and Harder (Lang 88(1):1-44, 2012) propose that this later encoding of grammatical elements is motivated by two specific features of grammatical elements. The first feature, dependence, is that grammatical items (morphemes, words, constructions) cannot be produced in isolation, but are always dependent on a lexical host item. This feature entails a more complex processing which might lead to longer reaction times when comparing the production of NPs with a grammatical determiner to a lexical one. Additionally, a more complex processing might lead to a lower accuracy rate for the grammatical condition relative to the lexical one. The second feature, low prominence, is that grammatical items code background information and therefore cannot convey the main point of a linguistic message. Less focus on grammatical elements might lead to a lower accuracy rate for the production of grammatical elements relative to lexical ones. Those predictions were tested in a task comparing the production of Danish grammatical determiners (indefinite articles) with the production of lexical ones (numerals, which are homonymous with the articles except for a stress difference) in similar contexts. Group-based analyses were performed in order to take inter-individual differences into account. The results show that the two features as proposed by Boye and Harder (2012) are only revealed for the fastest speakers group but not the slower ones.

Keywords:  Grammar; Inter-individual differences; Lexicon; Speech production

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29116479     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-017-9531-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  11 in total

1.  Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects.

Authors:  T F Münte; B M Wieringa; H Weyerts; A Szentkuti; M Matzke; S Johannes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Sequential processing during noun phrase production.

Authors:  Audrey Bürki; Jasmin Sadat; Anne-Sophie Dubarry; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-09-24

3.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.

Authors:  J W King; M Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access.

Authors:  Valentin Wagner; Jörg D Jescheniak; Herbert Schriefers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Response latencies in naming objects.

Authors:  R C Oldfield; A Wingfield
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Lexical access and frequency sensitivity: frequency saturation and open/closed class equivalence.

Authors:  B Gordon; A Caramazza
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-11

7.  Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production.

Authors:  Maureen Gillespie; Neal J Pearlmutter
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-11-27

8.  PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Planning and production of grammatical and lexical verbs in multi-word messages.

Authors:  Violaine Michel Lange; Maria Messerschmidt; Peter Harder; Hartwig Roman Siebner; Kasper Boye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inter-subject variability modulates phonological advance planning in the production of adjective-noun phrases.

Authors:  Violaine Michel Lange; Marina Laganaro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-31
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Meeting Point: Where Language Production and Working Memory Share Resources.

Authors:  Byurakn Ishkhanyan; Kasper Boye; Jesper Mogensen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.