Literature DB >> 17576154

Planning scope in spoken sentence production: the role of grammatical units.

Paul H Allum1, Linda R Wheeldon.   

Abstract

Four experiments investigate the scope of grammatical planning during spoken sentence production in Japanese and English. Experiment 1 shows that sentence latencies vary with length of sentence-initial subject phrase. Exploiting the head-final property of Japanese, Experiments 2 and 3 extend this result by showing that in a 2-phrase subject phrase, sentence latency varies with the length of the sentence-initial phrase rather than that of the whole subject phrase or its head phrase. Experiment 4 confirms this finding in English. The authors' interpretation suggests that these effects derive from grammatical encoding processes. Planning scope varies according to the relation between the 2 phrases composing the subject phrase. A thematically defined functional phrase is suggested as defining this scope.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17576154     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  18 in total

1.  Planning in sentence production: evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope.

Authors:  Randi C Martin; Jason E Crowther; Meredith Knight; Franklin P Tamborello; Chin-Lung Yang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

2.  Processes of incremental message planning during conversation.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Agnieszka E Konopka
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

3.  Utterance complexity and stuttering on function words in preschool-age children who stutter.

Authors:  Corrin Richels; Anthony Buhr; Edward Conture; Katerina Ntourou
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production.

Authors:  Maureen Gillespie; Neal J Pearlmutter
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-11-27

5.  A logarithmic speed-difficulty trade-off in speech production.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; Irina L Mikaelian
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.422

6.  Speed-difficulty trade-off in speech: Chinese versus English.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; Yao Sun; Elizaveta M Latash; Irina L Mikaelian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Ways of looking ahead: hierarchical planning in language production.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-09-14

8.  The dynamics of variation in individuals.

Authors:  Meredith Tamminga; Laurel MacKenzie; David Embick
Journal:  Linguist Var       Date:  2017-01-12

9.  A paradox of syntactic priming: why response tendencies show priming for passives, and response latencies show priming for actives.

Authors:  Katrien Segaert; Laura Menenti; Kirsten Weber; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  From mind to mouth: event related potentials of sentence production in classic galactosemia.

Authors:  Inge Timmers; Bernadette M Jansma; M Estela Rubio-Gozalbo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.