Literature DB >> 21113983

Predictive factors of hearing preservation after surgical resection of small vestibular schwannomas.

David J Phillips1, Erik J Kobylarz, Edgar T De Peralta, Philip E Stieg, Samuel H Selesnick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors predictive of hearing preservation in patients undergoing resection of small vestibular schwannoma. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: Forty patients with serviceable hearing preoperatively who underwent a potentially hearing sparing procedure for resection of small vestibular schwannoma (extending 1 cm or less into the cerebellopontine angle). INTERVENTION: Resection of vestibular schwannoma via the middle fossa (subtemporal) or retrosigmoid (suboccipital) approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively and classified according to the criteria of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Postoperatively, audiograms were unavailable for 5 patients without subjective hearing in the affected ear. These patients are included in the group without hearing preservation. Potential predictive factors of hearing preservation included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, audiometric data, and intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) monitoring.
RESULTS: Serviceable hearing was preserved in 23 patients (57.5%). Patient age, sex, preoperative hearing status, tumor size, laterality, extent of internal auditory canal involvement, surgical approach, wave V latency, and wave V amplitude were not predictive of hearing preservation. The presence of wave V on intraoperative BAER was the only significant predictor of hearing preservation (p < 0.019). Serviceable hearing was preserved in 14 patients (77.8%) with wave V present. Of note, serviceable hearing also was preserved in 9 patients (40.9%) without a measurable wave V.
CONCLUSION: No preoperative factor was predictive of hearing preservation. The presence of wave V on intraoperative BAER is a significant predictor of hearing preservation. Additionally, absence of wave V does not preclude preservation of serviceable hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21113983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  9 in total

1.  Determining benchmarks in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Michael B Gluth; John D Day; John L Dornhoffer
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-08

2.  Head tilt is pronounced after an ipsilateral head roll in patients with vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Topi Jutila; Heikki Aalto; Timo P Hirvonen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base: pitfalls and complications.

Authors:  Bernhard Schick; Julia Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

4.  [Hearing results after middle fossa removal of small (T1/T2) vestibular schwannomas].

Authors:  M Scheich; D Ehrmann-Müller; W Shehata-Dieler; R Hagen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Auditory Brain Stem Response Predictors of Hearing Outcomes after Middle Fossa Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Yin Ren; Catherine M Merna; Kareem O Tawfik; Marc S Schwartz; Rick A Friedman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-01-21

6.  Interaural Difference of Wave V Predicting Postoperative Hearing in Gardner-Robertson Class II Acoustic Neuroma Patients.

Authors:  Noritaka Aihara; Shingo Murakami; Keiji Takemura; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-06-13

7.  Hearing Outcomes after Middle Fossa or Retrosigmoid Craniotomy for Vestibular Schwannoma Tumors.

Authors:  Eric P Wilkinson; Daniel S Roberts; Adam Cassis; Marc S Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-02-13

8.  Preoperative characteristics of auditory brainstem response in acoustic neuroma with useful hearing: importance as a preliminary investigation for intraoperative monitoring.

Authors:  Noritaka Aihara; Shingo Murakami; Mariko Takahashi; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Retrosigmoid Versus Translabyrinthine Approach for Acoustic Neuroma Resection: An Assessment of Complications and Payments in a Longitudinal Administrative Database.

Authors:  Tyler Cole; Anand Veeravagu; Michael Zhang; Tej Azad; Christian Swinney; Gordon H Li; John K Ratliff; Steven L Giannotta
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-10-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.