Literature DB >> 27590491

[Hearing results after middle fossa removal of small (T1/T2) vestibular schwannomas].

M Scheich1, D Ehrmann-Müller2, W Shehata-Dieler2, R Hagen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hearing results after surgery for T1 and T2 vestibular schwannomas (VS) via the middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach at one institution and to review outcomes in the recent literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our department, 208 consecutive patients have undergone surgery using the MCF approach between December 2005 and February 2015. Audiological testing included pure-tone audiometry, speech-discrimination-tests pre- and postoperatively, as well as a pre- and intraoperative brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA). Hearing status was categorized according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) or Gardner-Robertson classification. Hearing preservation was assessed when postoperative values were still within class A + B.
RESULTS: In 167 of the 208 patients, preoperative hearing levels corresponded to class A+B. In 78 tumors, extension of the VS was limited to the internal auditory canal (T1) and in 89 tumors there was an extrameatal growth without touching the brainstem (T2). In 109 patients (65 %), postoperative hearing was still in class A+B. In the group of intrameatal tumors, the hearing preservation rate was even 69 %. The analysis of the literature of the past 16 years revealed comparable results (46-82 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for VS using the MCF approach is an established technique for reliable tumor removal with an adequate rate of hearing preservation. For small tumors without brainstem contact, particularly satisfying results can be achieved. This should be taken into account when discussing the possibility of early hearing preservation surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic neuroma; early surgery; hearing preservation; middle cranial fossa approach; vestibular schwannoma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27590491     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0228-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  43 in total

1.  Small acoustic neuromas: surgical outcomes versus observation or radiation.

Authors:  Ted A Meyer; Paul A Canty; Eric P Wilkinson; Marlan R Hansen; Jay T Rubinstein; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal and its contents through the middle, cranial fossa.

Authors:  W F HOUSE
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Outcome on hearing and facial nerve function in microsurgical treatment of small vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Christian Ginzkey; Matthias Scheich; Wilma Harnisch; Verena Bonn; Desiree Ehrmann-Müller; Wafaa Shehata-Dieler; Robert Mlynski; Rudolf Hagen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Hearing preservation and facial nerve outcomes in vestibular schwannoma surgery: results using the middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  H Alexander Arts; Steven A Telian; Hussam El-Kashlan; B Gregory Thompson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Durability of hearing preservation after microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma using the middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Anthony C Wang; Steven B Chinn; Khoi D Than; H Alexander Arts; Steven A Telian; Hussam K El-Kashlan; B Gregory Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Fundal fluid as a predictor of hearing preservation in the middle cranial fossa approach for vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  John C Goddard; Marc S Schwartz; Rick A Friedman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Hearing in patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Per Caye-Thomasen; Thomas Dethloff; Søren Hansen; Sven-Eric Stangerup; Jens Thomsen
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 8.  Vestibular schwannomas: complications of microsurgery.

Authors:  Pierre-Hugues Roche; Telmo Ribeiro; Henri-Dominique Fournier; Jean-Marc Thomassin
Journal:  Prog Neurol Surg       Date:  2008

9.  Conservative management of 386 cases of unilateral vestibular schwannoma: tumor growth and consequences for treatment.

Authors:  Wissame El Bakkouri; Romain E Kania; Jean-Pierre Guichard; Guillaume Lot; Philippe Herman; Patrice Tran Ba Huy
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  [Results in otosurgically treated patients with acoustic neuroma. Part 1: Facial nerve function after translabyrinthine and middle fossa resection].

Authors:  G Baier; K Schwager; J Helms; R Hagen
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 1.057

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Surgery of vestibular schwannoma - more clinical diagnostics of vertigo for a better preservation of hearing?]

Authors:  A Blödow
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Multi-option therapy vs observation for small acoustic neuroma: hearing-focused management.

Authors:  E Zanoletti; D Cazzador; C Faccioli; S Gallo; L Denaro; D D'Avella; A Martini; A Mazzoni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  [Hearing classification in patients with vestibular schwannoma using German-language test procedures].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke; D Vordermark; C Strauss; C Scheller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.284

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.