Literature DB >> 36091636

Auditory Brain Stem Response Predictors of Hearing Outcomes after Middle Fossa Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas.

Yin Ren1, Catherine M Merna2, Kareem O Tawfik1,3, Marc S Schwartz4, Rick A Friedman1.   

Abstract

Objectives  To analyze the relationship between preoperative and intraoperative auditory brain stem response (ABR) characteristics and hearing outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) undergoing hearing preservation (HP) surgery via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach. Design  Prospective study. Setting  Academic tertiary skull base referral center. Methods  Pre- and postoperative pure-tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS) were examined. Intraoperative ABR wave III latency, wave V latency, and amplitude were recorded. HP was defined as postoperative WRS ≥50%. Participants  Adult patients with VS and WRS ≥50% who underwent MCF tumor resection between November 2017 and September 2019. Main Outcome Measures  Postoperative hearing outcomes. Results  Sixty patients were included. Mean tumor size was 9.2 mm (range, 3-17). HP rates were 56.7% for the cohort and 69.7% for tumors <10 mm. A complete loss of wave V was associated with an 82.9% increase in postoperative PTA ( p  < 0.001) and 97.2% decrease in WRS ( p  < 0.001), whereas a diminished wave V was correlated with 62.7% increase in PTA ( p  < 0.001) and 55.7% decrease in WRS ( p  = 0.006). A diminished or absent wave V, but not increased wave III/V latency or decreased wave V amplitude, was correlated with a decline in postoperative hearing class ( r  = 0.735, p  < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that a stable wave V has the highest accuracy in predicting HP (sensitivity of 82.6%, specificity of 84.8%). Conclusion  Of the examined preoperative and intraoperative ABR characteristics, a stable wave V intraoperatively was the strongest predictor of HP after MCF resection of VS. Level of Evidence  Level III. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABR; hearing preservation; middle fossa; vestibular schwannoma

Year:  2021        PMID: 36091636      PMCID: PMC9462958          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  75 in total

1.  Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal and its contents through the middle, cranial fossa.

Authors:  W F HOUSE
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Hearing preservation by the extended and nonextended middle cranial fossa approach for acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  J Kanzaki; T O-Uchi; K Ogawa; R Shiobara; S Toya
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1994

Review 3.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery: advances and clinical implications.

Authors:  A Samy Youssef; Angela E Downes
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Acoustic neuroma surgery: use of cochlear nerve action potential monitoring for hearing preservation.

Authors:  L E Jackson; J B Roberson
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-03

5.  Combined intra-operative monitoring of hearing by means of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) during surgery of intra- and extrameatal acoustic neurinomas.

Authors:  H P Schlake; C Milewski; R H Goldbrunner; A Kindgen; R Riemann; J Helms; K Roosen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Hearing preservation in patients with acoustic neuromas via the middle fossa approach.

Authors:  P J Wade; W House
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Middle Fossa Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: Good Hearing and Facial Nerve Outcomes with Low Morbidity.

Authors:  Amol Raheja; Christian A Bowers; Joel D MacDonald; Clough Shelton; Richard K Gurgel; Cameron Brimley; William T Couldwell
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Durability of hearing preservation after microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma using the middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Anthony C Wang; Steven B Chinn; Khoi D Than; H Alexander Arts; Steven A Telian; Hussam K El-Kashlan; B Gregory Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma: experience with the middle fossa approach.

Authors:  Franco DeMonte; Paul W Gidley
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma resection with tumor size used as a clinical prognosticator.

Authors:  C S Hecht; V F Honrubia; R J Wiet; H S Sims
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.