Literature DB >> 24436924

Interaural Difference of Wave V Predicting Postoperative Hearing in Gardner-Robertson Class II Acoustic Neuroma Patients.

Noritaka Aihara1, Shingo Murakami2, Keiji Takemura2, Kazuo Yamada1.   

Abstract

Patients with acoustic neuroma classified in Gardner and Robertson (GR) Class II should be considered to have useful hearing, and patients classified in Class III should be considered to have not-useful hearing. Therefore, it is important for acoustic neuroma surgery to distinguish between postoperative GR Class II and Class III patients by brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). We evaluate which BAEP parameter is the best for predicting postoperative GR Class II or III in 36 preoperative GR Class II patients with unilateral acoustic neuroma. Delay in wave V latency, reduction ratio in wave V amplitude, and interaural difference of wave V (IT5) are evaluated by a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve in this study. IT5 is the best distinguishing parameter between postoperative Class II and Class III. IT5 below 1.12 millisecond (msec) should be a good marker to preserve postoperative useful hearing. Thus, comparing the latency of wave V on both sides is important, and surgeons would be able to make more informed decisions during surgery by checking IT5 on BAEPs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic neuroma; brainstem auditory evoked potentials; interaural difference of wave V; useful hearing

Year:  2013        PMID: 24436924      PMCID: PMC3774826          DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  15 in total

1.  Effect of BAEP monitoring on hearing preservation during acoustic neuroma resection.

Authors:  C M Harper; S G Harner; D H Slavit; W J Litchy; J R Daube; C W Beatty; M J Ebersold
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring: when is change in wave V significant?

Authors:  Michael L James; Aatif M Husain
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Cochlear nerve action potential monitoring with the microdissector in vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Noritaka Aihara; Shingo Murakami; Nobuhiro Watanabe; Mariko Takahashi; Akira Inagaki; Motoki Tanikawa; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2009-09

Review 4.  [Establishment of the criteria to evaluate intraoperative changes of brainstem auditory evoked potentials during microvascular decompression and acoustic neurinoma excision].

Authors:  T Sekiya; N Shimamura; T Hatayama; S Suzuki
Journal:  No Shinkei Geka       Date:  1996-05

Review 5.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the value of neurophysiology for evaluation and prediction of auditory function in 420 cases.

Authors:  C Matthies; M Samii
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  [Intraoperative ABR monitoring during cerebello-pontine angle surgery].

Authors:  H Tokimura; T Asakura; Y Tokimura; M Atsuchi; K Kimotsuki; E Sato; T Fukushima
Journal:  No Shinkei Geka       Date:  1990-11

8.  Predictive factors of hearing preservation after surgical resection of small vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  David J Phillips; Erik J Kobylarz; Edgar T De Peralta; Philip E Stieg; Samuel H Selesnick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  G Gardner; J H Robertson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Acoustic tumor detection with brain stem electric response audiometry.

Authors:  W A Selters; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1977-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  Stefan Rampp; Leonhard Rensch; Sebastian Simmermacher; Torsten Rahne; Christian Strauss; Julian Prell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  [Hearing results after middle fossa removal of small (T1/T2) vestibular schwannomas].

Authors:  M Scheich; D Ehrmann-Müller; W Shehata-Dieler; R Hagen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Hearing classification in patients with vestibular schwannoma using German-language test procedures].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke; D Vordermark; C Strauss; C Scheller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.284

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.